Jump to content

Draft Schedule


weams

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, joelala said:

Certainly could be.  

I'd be perfectly happy if the first round guys all got a million. And If they want to play College ball, let them. Eligible again the year after they last were enrolled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-draft-prospects-with-highest-ceilings/c-275054666

Quote

The optimist would say that different mocks say different things because there are so many worthy options. The pessimist might say you're seeing so many different picks because there is no clear-cut No. 2 prospect behind Auburn's Mize (who isn't guaranteed to go No. 1, by the way).

In general, this far removed from the actual Draft, it's not uncommon to see varying options, even as high as No. 2. Sometimes we have a good sense of who the top five picks will be, but the order is still to be determined. In this year's Draft, there doesn't seem to be much certainty at all, and it really will depend on what direction the Giants want to go in. San Francisco has been the kind of team that is willing to take any kind of player in the Draft, and picking at No. 2, it will take the best available player. If it wants a high school arm, that could mean Stewart. If Mize goes No. 1 and the Giants want a college pitcher, it could be Brady Singer, who I had going there in my mock. There are a couple of college bats to choose from, with Georgia Tech's Joey Bart or South Alabama's Travis Swaggerty coming up in conversation. A high school bat doesn't seem likely, but never say never.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bpilktree67 said:

I would like a few guy mentioned above but think they will be gone.  I think we look college arm and maybe a lefty which organization lacks.  So i am predicting we take Ryan Rollison out of ole Miss.

I watched his last start, which was his best results-wise in a while. He’s pretty much a two pitch guy right now, the changeup is pretty raw for a college guy. He goes heavy, heavy with his curve/slider breaking ball around 80mph. Right handed hitters barrel his fastball frequently. He was 90-93 early with the fastball. There is talent and upside but I think he’s a major reach at 11 he’s like a college version of DL Hall in a bigger body. He’s more a 20-30 pick guy. If you want a soph LHP with some upside, you could probably get Ethan Small in the 3rd round. Not a big drop off IMO.

I actually liked Small better than Rolison in the game looks I’ve gotten, but I haven’t seen both of them enough to go completely against the industry and rank Small ahead, Rolison’s Cape performance has to count for something plus his breaking ball is the best pitch either has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I watched his last start, which was his best results-wise in a while. He’s pretty much a two pitch guy right now, the changeup is pretty raw for a college guy. He goes heavy, heavy with his curve/slider breaking ball around 80mph. Right handed hitters barrel his fastball frequently. He was 90-93 early with the fastball. There is talent and upside but I think he’s a major reach at 11 he’s like a college version of DL Hall in a bigger body. He’s more a 20-30 pick guy. If you want a soph LHP with some upside, you could probably get Ethan Small in the 3rd round. Not a big drop off IMO.

I actually liked Small better than Rolison in the game looks I’ve gotten, but I haven’t seen both of them enough to go completely against the industry and rank Small ahead, Rolison’s Cape performance has to count for something plus his breaking ball is the best pitch either has.

Everywhere I see him listed is in the mid to early teens.  He has three above average pitchers and is pretty polished already which means he should rise quick.  There are few other guys that have more upside but I think they are gone by our pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

Everywhere I see him listed is in the mid to early teens.  He has three above average pitchers and is pretty polished already which means he should rise quick.  There are few other guys that have more upside but I think they are gone by our pick.  

He may have three above average pitches, but in the starts I’ve seen he has had an average FB, above average CB, and fringe average changeup with below average command.

He was plus FB, plus curveball in video from the Cape, but he’s not carrying that stuff now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MarCakes21 said:

We use analytics?  Crazy.

Well in this case it seems more like they just glanced at some trackman data (easily available to team, I wish I had access to it) and said hey maybe he’s missing all these bats due to elite extension. It doesn’t sound like they did anything new or groundbreaking here. Just what I like to do which is use scouting and stats together to give context to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...