Jump to content

Kent Qualls' contract extended as Dir. of MiL Ops; more smoke and mirrors?


ThomasTomasz

Recommended Posts

Quote

While there have been significant changes for the Orioles in baseball operations, player development and scouting, the turnover won’t touch Kent Qualls.

The Orioles intend to bring back Qualls as director of minor league operations. The same title that he’s held since coming to the organization prior to the 2013 season.

Qualls’ past duties have included overseeing the administration of the club’s player development department and minor league affiliates. His responsibilities broadened under former executive vice president Dan Duquette, but it’s possible that some adjustments could be made under new front office hires.

There’s still so much uncertainty engulfing the franchise, but Qualls won’t be a casualty after Duquette and manager Buck Showalter learned their fates on Oct. 3.

Read More: http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2018/11/qualls-staying-with-orioles.html

Like many of you, I continue to hold my breath about the future of the Orioles- who we hire to fill the key spots in the front office, and then to the manager.  I've heard the statement that whoever is put in charge of baseball operations- whatever that title may be- will have full control to make changes as they see fit.  

However, a move like this, extending someone in a key FO position as director of minor league operations, directly conflicts with that statement.  While the farm system as a whole is on it's way up- a lot of credit has been given to John Wasdin's input on the pitching prospects we've drafted the past two years- I just don't understand how you can promise someone full control, and then have this key position not filled.  

I will continue to wait like the rest of you, but I'm really bummed out that it seems we are just about ready to head in the same direction we've been heading overall for the past 20 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

Like many of you, I continue to hold my breath about the future of the Orioles- who we hire to fill the key spots in the front office, and then to the manager.  I've heard the statement that whoever is put in charge of baseball operations- whatever that title may be- will have full control to make changes as they see fit.  

However, a move like this, extending someone in a key FO position as director of minor league operations, directly conflicts with that statement.  While the farm system as a whole is on it's way up- a lot of credit has been given to John Wasdin's input on the pitching prospects we've drafted the past two years- I just don't understand how you can promise someone full control, and then have this key position not filled.  

I will continue to wait like the rest of you, but I'm really bummed out that it seems we are just about ready to head in the same direction we've been heading overall for the past 20 years.  

Graham is the player development guy, Qualls is more a business manager. He deals with the relationship between the Orioles and their minor league affiliates. He's not a baseball guy, he's got a business administration degree and he's never played professionally. Qualls should be judged on how smoothly minor league operations are run, not on how players are developed or not developed.

Edit: To be clear, Qualls doesn't do what you think he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luke-OH said:

Graham is the player development guy, Qualls is more a business manager. He deals with the relationship between the Orioles and their minor league affiliates. He's not a baseball guy, he's got a business administration degree and he's never played professionally. Qualls should be judged on how smoothly minor league operations are run, not on how players are developed or not developed.

Edit: To be clear, Qualls doesn't do what you think he does.

I am aware of what he does to some extent, realizing he handles more of the business side of things.  I deal with the college sports equivalents of his position in my job quite a bit.  My point still stands- this is an important job, one that should be left to the incoming staff to hire, especially if the contract has run out.  So I am quite confused as to why we readily extended his deal before we've even announced a new head of baseball ops, much less a GM.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

I am aware of what he does to some extent, realizing he handles more of the business side of things.  I deal with the college sports equivalents of his position in my job quite a bit.  My point still stands- this is an important job, one that should be left to the incoming staff to hire, especially if the contract has run out.  So I am quite confused as to why we readily extended his deal before we've even announced a new head of baseball ops, much less a GM.  

Because his job, while essential, will not affect the rebuilding of the club. And, because someone has to do his job. If the new hierarchy doesn't like the way he does his job, they can replace him at any time. He doesn't make enough money to worry about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThomasTomasz said:

I am aware of what he does to some extent, realizing he handles more of the business side of things.  I deal with the college sports equivalents of his position in my job quite a bit.  My point still stands- this is an important job, one that should be left to the incoming staff to hire, especially if the contract has run out.  So I am quite confused as to why we readily extended his deal before we've even announced a new head of baseball ops, much less a GM.  

I'd imagine it's just a logistics thing. They don't have any issue with the work he's done and if they don't extend the contracts of some key personnel you could be looking at months before you have a replacement in place.

That's one reason why Rajsich is still around (although I'd be cool with him staying, I think he's done a good job), they need to start draft prep. Same with Graham. 

Now do I think they should be a month or two ahead of where they are now and already have a new FO in place? Of course. But that's not the case and you can't just have months of no one dealing with the logistics of running a MLB team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I'd imagine it's just a logistics thing. They don't have any issue with the work he's done and if they don't extend the contracts of some key personnel you could be looking at months before you have a replacement in place.

That's one reason why Rajsich is still around (although I'd be cool with him staying, I think he's done a good job), they need to start draft prep. Same with Graham. 

Now do I think they should be a month or two ahead of where they are now and already have a new FO in place? Of course. But that's not the case and you can't just have months of no one dealing with the logistics of running a MLB team. 

With the different affiliates and the logistics that get involved it would be prudent to keep someone on staff that can keep the affiliates informed as to their respective roles.  If someone does not think this is important than maybe they want the entire understructure  form Rookie Ball to AAA rebuilt from finding new affiliates to filling the roles on those staffs.  This would be counterproductive in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ThomasTomasz said:

I am aware of what he does to some extent, realizing he handles more of the business side of things.  I deal with the college sports equivalents of his position in my job quite a bit.  My point still stands- this is an important job, one that should be left to the incoming staff to hire, especially if the contract has run out.  So I am quite confused as to why we readily extended his deal before we've even announced a new head of baseball ops, much less a GM.  

Here’s the question — how much burden do you want to put on the new guys to fill literally every position in the organization in a short window of time?    Seems to me there’s some logic in retaining a few people for a year so that the new folks can focus on getting their arms around the organization and filling some key spots.    It’s not like Qualls has been given a lifetime contract; if they want someone else they can replace him in 2019.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

Graham is the player development guy, Qualls is more a business manager. He deals with the relationship between the Orioles and their minor league affiliates. He's not a baseball guy, he's got a business administration degree and he's never played professionally. Qualls should be judged on how smoothly minor league operations are run, not on how players are developed or not developed.

Edit: To be clear, Qualls doesn't do what you think he does.

Always appreciate your informed insight, Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WI O’s Fan said:

Where did this tidbit come from?

While the farm system as a whole is on it's way up- a lot of credit has been given to John Wasdin's input on the pitching prospects we've drafted the past two years-

Here’s the first article I saw crediting Wasdin for improving the O’s pitching development:  https://calltothepen.com/2018/07/30/baltimore-orioles-not-old-os/2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Brady doesn't count. 

Kent Qualls was the last man standing. 

Kent spent a good bit of time with my wife and I at spring training last season. At the Twin Lakes Park. Very informative and friendly.  He had been with the Pirates and Montreal in his history and knew people in Harrisburg that we did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

Brady doesn't count. 

Kent Qualls was the last man standing. 

Kent spent a good bit of time with my wife and I at spring training last season. At the Twin Lakes Park. Very informative and friendly.  He had been with the Pirates and Montreal in his history and knew people in Harrisburg that we did. 

The Guv-na?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, scOtt said:

The Guv-na?

I actually live across the street from the Governor's home. But he does not live there in that he commutes to work from Mt. Wolf each day. He attends various events there and of course some official business. Both Montreal and Pittsburgh had their double AA in Harrisburg in the years I have been in the area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

I actually live across the street from the Governor's home. But he does not live there in that he commutes to work from Mt. Wolf each day. He attends various events there and of course some official business. Both Montreal and Pittsburgh had their double AA in Harrisburg in the years I have been in the area. 

governors-residence-d07a9ec29e5fd3b4.jpgholiday-featured-image-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
    • I think of it differently.   I think keeping the  top 4 prospects in Holliday, Kjerstad, Mayo and Basallo  will influence who the O's add.   These 4 are keepers to build around for the next 6 years.   They will help keep the payroll low while providing improving performance. A year ago the O's had a surplus of position players in the top levels of the organization.    Elias decided to trade Joey Ortiz,  Norby, Stowers, Hovath, Etzel and Billy Cook to fill holes.    This thined out the prospects at the higher levels.   So I don't see the top four being traded for many years.   They will become part of the O's core players at the major league level IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...