Jump to content

MASN dispute update


JohnD

Recommended Posts

Thanks to Frobby for the math but I believe years ago Frobby also determined that the Orioles MLB franchise and the MASN operation were owned or at least managed by separate Partnerships, each owned largely by the Angelos family. The Orioles, if my memory is correct, do not own MASN and MASN profits do not accrue to the Orioles. PA would have to agree to spend those profits on the Orioles MLB franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnythingO's said:

Thanks to Frobby for the math but I believe years ago Frobby also determined that the Orioles MLB franchise and the MASN operation were owned or at least managed by separate Partnerships, each owned largely by the Angelos family. The Orioles, if my memory is correct, do not own MASN and MASN profits do not accrue to the Orioles. PA would have to agree to spend those profits on the Orioles MLB franchise.

I think that if the Orioles owned MASN that all profits would be subject to revenue sharing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think that if the Orioles owned MASN that all profits would be subject to revenue sharing.

Oh no doubt considerations like that went into the Partnership setup, that is assuming my memory of Frobby,s research is accurate. I just wanted to dispel the idea that MASN profits go directly to the Orioles. If I remembered correctly, it's PA's decision either way as he would be majority owner in both Partnerships. But PA would have to choose to rob Peter to pay Paul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Oh no doubt considerations like that went into the Partnership setup, that is assuming my memory of Frobby,s research is accurate. I just wanted to dispel the idea that MASN profits go directly to the Orioles. If I remembered correctly, it's PA's decision either way as he would be majority owner in both Partnerships. But PA would have to choose to rob Peter to pay Paul.

On at least one occasion he lent the team money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I think that if the Orioles owned MASN that all profits would be subject to revenue sharing.

As a general matter, a regional sports network's revenues are not subject to revenue  sharing. However, MLB recognizes that where a team controls the RSN, the amount of the cable rights fees paid by that RSN to the team are not determined by arm's-length bargaining, and that the amount may be set so low that a large portion of the value of the team's cable rights (which ordinarily would lead to revenues subject to sharing) are parked in the RSN, whose revenues are not subject to sharing. 

The purpose of the Revenue Sharing Definitions Committee (the rotating committee of three MLB owners or owner-designates that arbitrated the MASN-Nats dispute) is to review the cable rights fees in those related-party transactions to determine -- as I would put it -- the extent to which teams that control RSNs will be permitted to set rights fees in a way that diverts some of the value of those fees to their RSNs and reduces revenues subject to sharing. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Oh no doubt considerations like that went into the Partnership setup, that is assuming my memory of Frobby,s research is accurate. I just wanted to dispel the idea that MASN profits go directly to the Orioles. If I remembered correctly, it's PA's decision either way as he would be majority owner in both Partnerships. But PA would have to choose to rob Peter to pay Paul.

The Orioles, as the controlling partner in MASN, get to decide what to do with MASN's profits. They can distribute those profits to the partners; if they do that, the distribution is in the ratio of the partnership interests (currently 80 percent Orioles, 20 percent Nats). Or the Orioles can leave some or all of the profits in MASN for MASN's use. As controlling partner, the Orioles have an obligation to protect MASN's interests and to treat the Nats fairly by permitting MASN to retain enough of its profits to meet its ongoing needs and by not leaving the profits in MASN just because, hypothetically, the Nats need the money and the Orioles don't. There may be further limitations or requirements about distributing profits in the portions of the 2005 MASN agreement that have been blacked out.

But basically the Orioles call the shots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

The MASN dispute.   Here’s something relevant: last week MASN filed a brief seeking to clarify a small point about how to calculate the overdue sum on which interest is now due.     In the course of making the argument, MASN disclosed that it paid the Nats $41.8 mm in profit distributions during 2012-16.     It went on to say that it couldn’t have made these payments if rights fees were set at the levels awarded by the panel.    

This figure is interesting because the Nats only owned 13-17% of MASN from 2012-16, so this implies that the Orioles share of the profits (if the O’s had won the arbitration) would have been about  $236.9 mm, in addition to the $197.6 mm in rights fees they received.    So, a total of $434.5 mm over 5 years.    Instead, they’ll receive $296.8 mm in rights fees (equal to the Nats) and about $68.3 mm in profits, for a total of about $365.1 mm.    Still a nice chunk of change from their TV network.    

Yeah I would say this is interesting, especially for all the people that have said the MASN makes no money and isn't profitable. They make and insane amount of money every year off MASN and always have. Just remember that when they tell you they are a "small market team" who can't afford guys like Manny Machado because it would "cripple" their business. Thank you for posting this, might have about 47 threads to bump now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

The MASN dispute.   Here’s something relevant: last week MASN filed a brief seeking to clarify a small point about how to calculate the overdue sum on which interest is now due.     In the course of making the argument, MASN disclosed that it paid the Nats $41.8 mm in profit distributions during 2012-16.     It went on to say that it couldn’t have made these payments if rights fees were set at the levels awarded by the panel.    

This figure is interesting because the Nats only owned 13-17% of MASN from 2012-16, so this implies that the Orioles share of the profits (if the O’s had won the arbitration) would have been about  $236.9 mm, in addition to the $197.6 mm in rights fees they received.    So, a total of $434.5 mm over 5 years.    Instead, they’ll receive $296.8 mm in rights fees (equal to the Nats) and about $68.3 mm in profits, for a total of about $365.1 mm.    Still a nice chunk of change from their TV network.    

Wow. Enough to pay a Scherzer.  Only. Good pick up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

And some said the deal was stupid and not negotiated well.

Those mostly seem to be the people who think the only correct outcome was the Orioles having 100% control of the entire area from Raleigh, NC to York and from Wilmington to Charleston, WV for all time, and that no team would ever encroach on that.

In that context having the Orioles own 2/3rds of another team's RSN in a larger and richer market seems like a raw deal.

In the context of one who believes that Baltimore and DC aren't the same city and one shouldn't control the other's destiny the O's current agreement seems fantastic for the Orioles and kind of ridiculous for the Nats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Those mostly seem to be the people who think the only correct outcome was the Orioles having 100% control of the entire area from Raleigh, NC to York and from Wilmington to Charleston, WV for all time, and that no team would ever encroach on that.

In that context having the Orioles own 2/3rds of another team's RSN in a larger and richer market seems like a raw deal.

In the context of one who believes that Baltimore and DC aren't the same city and one shouldn't control the other's destiny the O's current agreement seems fantastic for the Orioles and kind of ridiculous for the Nats.

Or they could just go back to Montreal. That would be better for all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no question that Baltimore, DC, and Annapolis are the same market area. Not necessarily for driving around. But for advertising and shared boosterism. Better mass transit could correct the issues. The TV market is definitely shared. Now maybe not Harrisburg or Norfolk. I could see that debate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, weams said:

There is no question that Baltimore, DC, and Annapolis are the same market area. Not necessarily for driving around. But for advertising and shared boosterism. Better mass transit could correct the issues. The TV market is definitely shared. Now maybe not Harrisburg or Norfolk. I could see that debate. 

It's going to take some kind of crazy multi-billion dollar Elon Musk hyperloop to make it convenient to get from Nats Park to OPACY in a reasonable amount of time in normal weekday traffic.  And by your definition San Francisco and Oakland are one market, as are Anaheim and LA.  Certainly the Bronx and Flushing Meadows.  Not sure baseball really needs to kick out all the teams splitting huge markets.  The Yanks don't need the help.

Also, it'll be sad to see the Ravens go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the Orioles not wanting to give more in broadcast rights fees to the Nationals. This is subject to revenue sharing. Plus the Orioles have to match that.So all the additional money in rights fees go to revenue sharing and not separate of MASN revenue.Also when you own 90 or so percent of the network and will go down to 67 % by 2032,the profits will keep decreasing .Also RSN will be much different by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...