Jump to content

O's 2020 MLB Draft Chat: Picking #2/30/39/74


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

That’s fair. I totally see where you’re coming from. Hopefully we are able to add a better overall group of talent with this strategy. Because we certainly need it. 

But with that said, Kjerstad had much better OBP and fewer strikeouts this truncated season at Arkansas and with Team USA this past summer. It’s a surprising pick and certainly a bit of a reach, but if he would have kept that same torrid pace up this season, it wouldn’t have been. 

I don’t feel like this is a Hobgood situation. 

I get why people like Kjerstad, I just don't like him at #2.  Especially when it sounds like he's not a great defender, either.  The bat must be REALLY special.  Unfortunately we didn't get a whole season but if Elias and co. think that he's on the upswing, well, that's good.  

Maybe comping Hobgood off the bat was a bit extreme but in the moment it certainly felt like a slot savings move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

This year was a very small sample size, and I believe this pick was a case of recency bias. 

This year, yes. But if you add in Team USA, that’s about half a college season of all-around tremendous play. I don’t think that’s very small. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I get why people like Kjerstad, I just don't like him at #2.  Especially when it sounds like he's not a great defender, either.  The bat must be REALLY special.  Unfortunately we didn't get a whole season but if Elias and co. think that he's on the upswing, well, that's good.  

Maybe comping Hobgood off the bat was a bit extreme but in the moment it certainly felt like a slot savings move.

I can’t argue with any of that. I definitely think it’s a savings move to some extent, and it could be a significant savings move, depending on what Martin and Scotty B. wanted. We just have to see what happens with these next few picks. 

Its a risk for sure, but with the trajectory Kjerstad was on, I feel good about it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

I can’t argue with any of that. I definitely think it’s a savings move to some extent, and it could be a significant savings move, depending on what Martin and Scotty B. wanted. We just have to see what happens with these next few picks. 

Its a risk for sure, but with the trajectory Kjerstad was on, I feel good about it. 

Well, you've calmed me down some. I've gone from nuclear level mad to just pretty upset, lol. i just don't understand the risk of the strategy of saving money to potentially get guys that we like later in the draft, especially if we pick guys at 30 and 39 that we could have gotten there anyway without picking Kjerstad. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

I can’t argue with any of that. I definitely think it’s a savings move to some extent, and it could be a significant savings move, depending on what Martin and Scotty B. wanted. We just have to see what happens with these next few picks. 

Its a risk for sure, but with the trajectory Kjerstad was on, I feel good about it. 

i'm outta rep for the day but, yes.  

Unfortunate that there's not going to be a minor league season this year, would really like to see him this summer to see if that trajectory kept going.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

i'm outta rep for the day but, yes.  

Unfortunate that there's not going to be a minor league season this year, would really like to see him this summer to see if that trajectory kept going.

I'm sure we are going to hear great things about what he does at camp.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

Well, you've calmed me down some. I've gone from nuclear level mad to just pretty upset, lol. i just don't understand the risk of the strategy of saving money to potentially get guys that we like later in the draft, especially if we pick guys at 30 and 39 that we could have gotten there anyway without picking Kjerstad. 

I get it. I think I’m just better with it because I wasn’t as high on Martin and was probably a little higher on Heston than others. It was the perfect storm. Haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

I get it. I think I’m just better with it because I wasn’t as high on Martin and was probably a little higher on Heston than others. It was the perfect storm. Haha. 

For me, part of it was that Martin went to Toronto.  I'd probably care less if he went to Miami or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...