Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Pretty wild. Yeah, Moustakas projects better in 2020, but that’s a lot of risk for a little 2020 bump, they have to be pretty confident in their place on the win curve.

Agreed, but it's not the first head scratcher move made by the Reds. They don't seem to ever have a long term vision for the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weams said:

This is what the owners want to have. 

You think most owners are more businessman than baseball fan? 

It's an interesting question. If you offered the Sons (or another owner) these two choices for the 2020s, which one would they pick:

a) Highest profit in the league, huge growth in franchise value, 0 playoff appearances

b) Lowest profit in the league, 2 World Series championships

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, luismatos4prez said:

You think most owners are more businessman than baseball fan? 

It's an interesting question. If you offered the Sons (or another owner) these two choices for the 2020s, which one would they pick:

a) Highest profit in the league, huge growth in franchise value, 0 playoff appearances

b) Lowest profit in the league, 2 World Series championships

I wonder what the difference is between the lowest profit and the highest profit?

Was 2016 one of the years the Orioles "lost" money?

The Phillies made 88M in 2016 (Forbes).  If the difference between first and 30th is 50 million a year I'm guessing a lot of team owners would rather have a half a billion dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

I see it more like deciding whether or not to give a pending free agent a qualifying offer. For Villar, the QO is around $10 million. Is that a good investment for the team? I don't think so, especially if no one else is willing to pay him that. Should have made the same decision with Wieters.

But Wieters was no producing anymore and his QO was an absurd $17 million. Duquette didn't think he would take that offer and become a free agent but Wieters was smart enough to take it. Villar is coming off a 4-win season at 28-years of age. Big difference.

I think there are teams willing to pay Villar $7-10 million a year but they are not going to give up talent and then pay him that when they know the Orioles are just going to release him and then they can just sign him. I feel like the Orioles showed their cards a little too early and now are trying a last ditch effort to get teams to pony up now that teams can just select him off waivers and give up nothing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, luismatos4prez said:

You think most owners are more businessman than baseball fan? 

It's an interesting question. If you offered the Sons (or another owner) these two choices for the 2020s, which one would they pick:

a) Highest profit in the league, huge growth in franchise value, 0 playoff appearances

b) Lowest profit in the league, 2 World Series championships

All owners admire the Rays organization.  And the Yankees won no titles in the 10s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

But Wieters was no producing anymore and his QO was an absurd $17 million. Duquette didn't think he would take that offer and become a free agent but Wieters was smart enough to take it. Villar is coming off a 4-win season at 28-years of age. Big difference.

I think there are teams willing to pay Villar $7-10 million a year but they are not going to give up talent and then pay him that when they know the Orioles are just going to release him and then they can just sign him. I feel like the Orioles showed their cards a little too early and now are trying a last ditch effort to get teams to pony up now that teams can just select him off waivers and give up nothing.

 

How much talent do you think they would have had to give up at the end of the day?  I think he would have accepted very little in the last day or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

We made the playoffs by the skin of our teeth in 2016.    I’d say we might not have made it without Wieters, who had a ton of clutch hits that year.   I’m happy we gave him that QO.    And remember, the reason we did it was that we would have gotten draft pick compensation if he walked.    To that point, no player had ever accepted a QO.    Many were surprised when he took it.   

I'd argue that we might have made it more easily if Buck would have played the clearly better that year Joseph over Wieters more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

But Wieters was no producing anymore and his QO was an absurd $17 million. Duquette didn't think he would take that offer and become a free agent but Wieters was smart enough to take it. Villar is coming off a 4-win season at 28-years of age. Big difference.

I think there are teams willing to pay Villar $7-10 million a year but they are not going to give up talent and then pay him that when they know the Orioles are just going to release him and then they can just sign him. I feel like the Orioles showed their cards a little too early and now are trying a last ditch effort to get teams to pony up now that teams can just select him off waivers and give up nothing.

 

You mean when they were trying to trade him at the deadline and got no offers?  I agree.that no one would trade for him based on the situation. But evidently no one claimed him either. Now they will have to give a multi year deal perhaps. The league did not value him for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Really nice to see the pitchers progressing with a solid crew from 5-8.
    • I think you are underselling the month. Would you be unhappy if they went 3-3 to start this?  I’m honestly not expecting more than that.
    • If they play well we have a great shot to put a little distance between us and the Yankees.  That would be a great story line going into the ASB. 
    • The discussion in the offseason was, if you trade one, who do you trade. I kept going back and forth on the answer but my ultimate thought process was that Cowser is the better all around player but Kjerstad’s best tool, his power, is better than any single tool Cowser has. I still basically stand by that thought.    This is a long winded way of saying Kjerstad’s power is just better than Cowser’s, so he definitely can get away with things that Cowser can’t. You have pointed out a lot of warning track outs for Cowser. I would suspect many of those would be homers off of Kjerstad’s bat.
    • The panic is crazy.  Of course we need to upgrade for a WS run, that’s the prudent thing to do.  But the panic is just that, emotional thinking causing lapse in judgement. We are 4th in all MLB in ER given up, 3rd in era, & 3rd in FIP.  The pitching is doing quite well.    I keep hearing that Elias has done nothing about the pitching.  But here we are as one of the elite pitching teams in baseball right now and below is what Fangraphs had to say about the system.  Why are people still saying our organization has ignored pitching? Why are people suggesting trading potential generational talent for mediocre pitching upgrades?  There are so many interesting pitchers in this system that it was tough to include them all. There’s an org we’re aware of whose scouts need to write a full report on a player if he touches 95 in front of them. If you’re a scout from that team covering Baltimore, you’ve had to write up more than 80 pitchers based on their peak velo alone. The retaining wall of arms is strong in the upper levels, giving the Orioles the pitching depth to contend amid injuries.  
    • I never like getting ahead of myself, or assume we will dominate bad teams.  I know we had one poster who was saying we really should sweep Houston.  Uh, yeah.    But honestly, we’re a .630 winning percentage team, and this is a soft part of our schedule.  15-10 would disappoint me greatly.  16-9 would be okay but a missed opportunity.     
    • So you give up 2 top 100 prospects for 2 seasons and a limited second half? I’m glad you’re not in control. I know we’re currently a bit spoiled with the tanking and better front office. But I don’t see why you’d want to give up 3-4 players that include 2 of those guys. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...