Jump to content

Is Sisco Toast?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There have been 54 drafts.  Sisco was the #61 overall pick.  He's 13th in MLB games played among #61 overall picks.  He's 18th in rWAR.  

 Among players drafted #58-63 there have been 25 who've ended up with 10+ win careers.  That's out of 324 picks, so that works out to 8%. Roughly 240 of the 324 had zero or fewer rWAR in their entire careers.  And something approaching 50% of the 324 never appeared in the majors.

 The median player taken around Sisco's spot appears briefly in the majors and has a below-replacement career.  So, as I've said before, to be an marginally acceptable draft pick you have to be way above average.  Everyone is disappointed with 80+% of all picks.

Yeah I think people expect too much from the draft.  I tried to find a team that consistently drafted well and they don't seem to exist.   I hear how once Elias gets the drafting going we are going to have good players coming up every year.  And that isn't how it works. If you get one solid guy out of whole draft you are doing well.

You look at the Angels  and they had a great draft the year they drafted Trout but not much since.  Best #1 since then is CJ Cron with something like 6 WAR.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomic said:

Yeah I think people expect too much from the draft.  I tried to find a team that consistently drafted well and they don't seem to exist.   I hear how once Elias gets the drafting going we are going to have good players coming up every year.  And that isn't how it works. If you get one solid guy out of whole draft you are doing well.

You look at the Angels  and they had a great draft the year they drafted Trout but not much since.  Best #1 since then is CJ Cron with something like 6 WAR.  

 

Elias did build the Astros, by installing a mechanism to better look at satistics and allow them to draft better.

It worked once, here's hoping he repeats his magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Elias did build the Astros, by installing a mechanism to better look at satistics and allow them to draft better.

It worked once, here's hoping he repeats his magic.

I think you are overrating his drafting.  Look at how few players on the team this year are guys that were drafted when he was there.  Mostly veterans acquired from trades and free agency.  

Look at his 2013 draft.  Nothing there.  Compare it to ours with Mancini, Yaz, Sisco and Harvey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, atomic said:

I think you are overrating his drafting.  Look at how few players on the team this year are guys that were drafted when he was there.  Mostly veterans acquired from trades and free agency.  

Look at his 2013 draft.  Nothing there.  Compare it to ours with Mancini, Yaz, Sisco and Harvey. 

So you are in disagreement that the Astros didnt win the WS based on work Elias and his team did for the GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, atomic said:

I think you are overrating his drafting.  Look at how few players on the team this year are guys that were drafted when he was there.  Mostly veterans acquired from trades and free agency.  

Look at his 2013 draft.  Nothing there.  Compare it to ours with Mancini, Yaz, Sisco and Harvey. 

Yaz, funny you should mention him.

We let him go, he was not supposed to be able to be a daily COF, and at best maybe a bench COF on a deep team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

So you are in disagreement that the Astros didnt win the WS based on work Elias and his team did for the GM?

Dude, don't even engage with him on this.  It's exhausting and frustrating.  It's been explained to him up and down a million times, yet he keeps banging his head against the wall that Elias was a failure in Houston.  

He's much better on ignore, trust me.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

So you are in disagreement that the Astros didnt win the WS based on work Elias and his team did for the GM?

They won it by the trades and signings  made by the GM and the players they already had on the roster.  Elias big picks were #1 or #2 overall.  I don't see any team out there even consistently hitting on their first round picks.  If someone is please let me know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Dude, don't even engage with him on this.  It's exhausting and frustrating.  It's been explained to him up and down a million times, yet he keeps banging his head against the wall that Elias was a failure in Houston.  

He's much better on ignore, trust me.

Yeah ignore facts.  Look at the Astros roster.  Most everyone is over 28.  The only starters drafted during Elias time are Bregman and Correa.  Even with pitchers all older guys except Osuna who was traded for when he had off field issues. 

Alvarez was traded for not drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Great ref site thanks.

I scrolled through some of the other teams.

Guess, I was out of wrack for expecting more from a 2nd rounder.

Thanks

 

The failure rate on high draft picks is counterintuitive.    It’s damned hard to make it to the majors and have an impact.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It’s called venting, montezuma’s revenge-o.
    • It did look like they already have their game legs back--maybe in time to make that dream come true. I live in Brooklyn and it's going to be a challenge to hold my place and my lip in the sports bars over the next three days (unless I go to one filled with Mets fans who are just letting one screen tune into the game in the Bronx).
    • Haha, yeah--Try to "Mooo!" that and see what happens.
    • Adley was 2022, not sure if Gunnar was 2022 or 2023, I think he was also 2022.
    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...