Jump to content

Austin Hays called up


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Some fantasy keeper leagues are geared to this too - Kyle Tucker has the same 120 AB's as Hays entering the last 4 days.  If we're triangulating for 2020 ROY, Tucker playing 3 out of the clinched Astros last 4 would be a big help.

if 2020 goes well, Orioles will congest the ROY rankings - I'd hope Harvey, Mountcastle, Diaz and even Akin rate by this time next year.

Last year and this year, the Rays have broken in talented relievers.  Diego Castillo debuted June 6 and threw 56 innings last year.  This year, Colin Poche debuted June 8 and with four days to go is at 50 innings - he'll get another couple the next four days.  Kudos to Tampa for perhaps having it both ways with Super Two and Rookie of the Year avoidance - macro arbitration management.

 

 I think in 2010 Neftalí Feliz won rookie of the year as a reliever, but I don’t think it’s easy for a reliever to win.

Vlad Junior was much hyped, and although he’s hit pretty well, his defense is not good. Hays’ scouting report Pegged him at a 50 On defense, which is solid average. He seems to have been better than that so far, so I would probably give him the nod over Mountcastle or any of our pitchers, Especially since it seems that none of our rookies Will break camp with the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

 I think in 2010 Neftalí Feliz won rookie of the year as a reliever, but I don’t think it’s easy for a reliever to win.

Vlad Junior was much hyped, and although he’s hit pretty well, his defense is not good. Hays’ scouting report Pegged him at a 50 On defense, which is solid average. He seems to have been better than that so far, so I would probably give him the nod over Mountcastle or any of our pitchers, Especially since it seems that none of our rookies Will break camp with the team.

I feel like if Harvey holds up for 55-60 innings and they let him get the 25-30 saves, he might be the award's best candidate, even if Hays/Mountcastle/Diaz acquit themselves respectably in 500-ish PA's, or Akin in 25 starts.

Given how giddy Hyde has seemed talking about him, I think he's the guy I'd pick if I had to bet on one Oriole for 2020 ROY.  I also feel like even Elias/Sig may be okay letting him try to run with the role, maximizing the next 3 years with the thought the arm will be blown out by (if not before) the time arb comes around.

If Dad is destiny, Bryan Harvey also got a few innings his Age-24 season before proceeding to save 17/25/25/46 games the ensuing four seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I feel like if Harvey holds up for 55-60 innings and they let him get the 25-30 saves, he might be the award's best candidate, even if Hays/Mountcastle/Diaz acquit themselves respectably in 500-ish PA's, or Akin in 25 starts.

Given how giddy Hyde has seemed talking about him, I think he's the guy I'd pick if I had to bet on one Oriole for 2020 ROY.  I also feel like even Elias/Sig may be okay letting him try to run with the role, maximizing the next 3 years with the thought the arm will be blown out by (if not before) the time arb comes around.

If Dad is destiny, Bryan Harvey also got a few innings his Age-24 season before proceeding to save 17/25/25/46 games the ensuing four seasons.

Everybody talked giddy about Bundy and Gausman until they showed in the MLB and wasn't able to live up to the hype.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Everybody talked giddy about Bundy and Gausman until they showed in the MLB and wasn't able to live up to the hype.

 

Well Bundy was almost entirely due to injury.  You can see from his repertoire why he was so well-regarded.  Imagine if he still had that FB that sat at 95/96.  He'd be a TOR starter.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Everybody talked giddy about Bundy and Gausman until they showed in the MLB and wasn't able to live up to the hype.

 

Bundy's arm was ravaged by injuries and I grade him on a curve. Gausman doesn't have that excuse, he's been a two pitch pitcher who has been more of a thrower rather than a pitcher. Dave Johnson constantly criticized Gausman for his mediocre pitching and he uncanny ability to throw center cut fastballs on 0-2 counts.

I suspect much of the criticism stemmed from Dave because he made the most of his ability with a fastball that couldn't break a pane of glass. While Gausman could still throw it 99 MPH in the sixth inning with ease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenn__davis said:

Well Bundy was almost entirely due to injury.  You can see from his repertoire why he was so well-regarded.  Imagine if he still had that FB that sat at 95/96.  He'd be a TOR starter.

Bundy looked like another Roger Clemens or Tom Seaver when he initially came up pitching with velocities in the upper 90s. If Gausman topped out in the low 90's like Bundy does now, Gausman would have never made it past AA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Well Bundy was almost entirely due to injury.  You can see from his repertoire why he was so well-regarded.  Imagine if he still had that FB that sat at 95/96.  He'd be a TOR starter.

I'm not sure I agree 100%. Bundy's fastball velocity trended down as soon as he became a professional. Each year he came back and the velocity fell, partially because he found he commanded his fastball better without full effort, and partially because he just throw slower. Now, could it be partially because of the surgeries? Perhaps, but he never really had the body of a pitcher who would throw in the upper 90s consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm not sure I agree 100%. Bundy's fastball velocity trended down as soon as he became a professional. Each year he came back and the velocity fell, partially because he found he commanded his fastball better without full effort, and partially because he just throw slower. Now, could it be partially because of the surgeries? Perhaps, but he never really had the body of a pitcher who would throw in the upper 90s consistently.

My assumption was that it was always related to his high school workout routine. I love fitness. I don't love extreme impact/resistance fitness. I think he did it to himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LookinUp said:

My assumption was that it was always related to his high school workout routine. I love fitness. I don't love extreme impact/resistance fitness. I think he did it to himself.

I think if it was due to high school workload, it was less about the workouts and more about the huge amount of competitive pitches thrown. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, orioles22 said:

Didn't I see Bundy clocked at 93 a few times against Toronto earlier in the week? Any chance he can get back to 95-96 with off-season work?

He touched 95 in June, I guess you mean sit 95-96. There is always a chance, but it's extremely small, he's at an age where it's common to lose velocity rather than gain it. 

I think there is room for improvement without a significant velocity bump. I'd be interested in seeing him attempt a Masahiro Tanaka pitch mix (30% FB, 40% breaking balls, 30% changeups), or something in that direction. Bundy's offspeed stuff is superior to Tanaka's and he's more like 50/33/17.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hays coming on at CF really makes this lineup have above average potential for next year. Next year will be tank city again so we won’t see this till after the clock games with Mountcastle,

1. Villar SS S

2. Hays CF R

3. Mancini 1B R

4. Santander RF S

5. Mountcastle DH R

6. Nunez 3B R

7.  Alberto 2B R

8.  Smith Jr LF L

9.  Sisco C L

Severino, Ruiz, Stewart, Wilkerson

Villar will be gone, but if you could add Diaz to LF while Villar is here, whew we’d be real fun to watch. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...