Jump to content

2019 Draft Standouts


cboemmeljr

Recommended Posts

Thanks for these.    I’m really fascinated by Dan Hammer.   Here’s a guy who had a 6.15 ERA and 1.67 WHIP in college, and we draft him and he posts a 1.29 ERA and 0.89 WHIP.     Obviously the O’s saw something in the guy and were able to help him make some adjustments and become very effective.    I’d love to know what they did with him.

Overall Elias & Co. seem to have done a fantastic job of finding value later in the draft.    They didn’t even choose a pitcher until the 8th round and yet the guys they drafted had tremendous success.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neat write-ups. Certainly guys to follow. This quote was the most striking to me:

Quote

I am even willing to go out on a limb and make the “bold prediction” that Welk will become the second most remembered member of the 2019 draft class and one of General Manager Mike Elias’ signature picks.

That is bold. Hopefully he's a hit!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

Thanks for these.    I’m really fascinated by Dan Hammer.   Here’s a guy who had a 6.15 ERA and 1.67 WHIP in college, and we draft him and he posts a 1.29 ERA and 0.89 WHIP.     Obviously the O’s saw something in the guy and were able to help him make some adjustments and become very effective.    I’d love to know what they did with him.

Overall Elias & Co. seem to have done a fantastic job of finding value later in the draft.    They didn’t even choose a pitcher until the 8th round and yet the guys they drafted had tremendous success.   

I watched a number of Hammer’s college starts and he was a guy who’d show you 3 average pitches at times but had poor control and inconsistent feel.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welk did so well this year, but Gunnar is considered the likely 3rd baseman of the future and makes the top 10 for Tony and Luke.  What will Welk have to do to stay ahead (he was basically a level above) or get ahead (in the rankings)?  Does he have a shot  at the majors or is he likely to be only a throw in for a trade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pheasants said:

Welk did so well this year, but Gunnar is considered the likely 3rd baseman of the future and makes the top 10 for Tony and Luke.  What will Welk have to do to stay ahead (he was basically a level above) or get ahead (in the rankings)?  Does he have a shot  at the majors or is he likely to be only a throw in for a trade?

Welk will have to excel at his level while moving up, over a full season of minor league ball. There's more, of course, but I suspect people will be a little conservative on their opinions until he does. I don't know if Tony/Luke have seen him or not.

But Henderson is VERY young. If he performs, it'll be hard to over take him in the rankings, or stay ahead of him in the minors, because he'll be busy over taking a bunch of other folks. That's not a knock on Welk though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 11/11/2019 at 10:07 AM, Frobby said:

Thanks for these.    I’m really fascinated by Dan Hammer.   Here’s a guy who had a 6.15 ERA and 1.67 WHIP in college, and we draft him and he posts a 1.29 ERA and 0.89 WHIP.     Obviously the O’s saw something in the guy and were able to help him make some adjustments and become very effective.    I’d love to know what they did with him.

Overall Elias & Co. seem to have done a fantastic job of finding value later in the draft.    They didn’t even choose a pitcher until the 8th round and yet the guys they drafted had tremendous success.   

This is my (not so) secret fantasy for the Elias regime. Identifying characteristics in players that are under-valued in the marketplace, applying a combo of technology and / or advanced coaching techniques that players can rapidly and permanently integrate for sustained success.

This, and drafting awesome baseball names, like "Dan Hammer"

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...