Jump to content

AFL Roster


wickedwitch

Recommended Posts

Matusz is/will be on the 40-man roster, so he's not below AA.

Being on the 40 man roster and where they are in the minors are two different things.

Nolan Reimold will be added to the 40 man roster this September or November so he will technically be on the 40 man roster when he is in the AFL. Hayden Penn was in the AFL last year even though he was on the 40 man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like Cleveland has sent their top prospects for 1B and 3B, so Snyder is going to have to fight for playing time. The Indians 1B prospect, Beau Mills, was voted the Carolina League MVP and was selected as the al-star 1B over Snyder. The 3B propsect, Wes Hodges, was at AA this year. http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080826&content_id=450525&vkey=news_milb&fext=.jsp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C Wieters - May - Mitchell

1B Mills - Snyder

2B

3B Hodges - Whittleman

SS DeJesus - Davis - McConnell - Rodriguez

LF Tracy - Reimold - Dickerson - Lambo

CF Borbon

RF McFall - Hoffman - Head

Noticing that Surprise Rafters has no 2B prospect.

Do they use a DH in this league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find Wieters inclusion a bit interesting, as I was under the impression he was winding down his first year in the organization,and would be shut down like most other minor leaguers at the end of their season. Curious.

He gets a chance to work with Gary Allenson (AAA manager)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way should they be sending Wieters...They complain that he has caught more now than ever before and then they send him to Arizona, a league that is about the same level of competition he has already played in and dominated?
I don't think the "he has caught more now than ever before" argument was a legit argument for not bringing him up to Baltimore. It was just some BS excuse given because they can't say "we're keeping him down for financial reasons" which is very obviously the case.

And the AFL is a higher league than AA, so it'll be good to see him against that competition, although I still expect him to dominate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the "he has caught more now than ever before" argument was a legit argument for not bringing him up to Baltimore. It was just some BS excuse given because they can't say "we're keeping him down for financial reasons" which is very obviously the case.

And the AFL is a higher league than AA, so it'll be good to see him against that competition, although I still expect him to dominate.

Yes, its better but it is also a hitters league.

He will dominate there too.

Not really him for him to gain by sending him there, especially with what should be his first ML season this coming year, which is a longer season obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, its better but it is also a hitters league.

He will dominate there too.

Not really him for him to gain by sending him there, especially with what should be his first ML season this coming year, which is a longer season obviously.

True, the only benefit is seeing a few more advance pitchers. Not much to gain, but really not much to hurt either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way should they be sending Wieters...They complain that he has caught more now than ever before and then they send him to Arizona, a league that is about the same level of competition he has already played in and dominated?

How many at-bats does Wieters have at AA and above? Just because he's done well for two months in AA is no reason to keep him from the AFL. One can review the experience and quality of prospects heading to the AFL and it is ridicously overcritical to claim Wieters should not go because he is too good.

A guess another group of posters would claim it would have been a slap in the face to MW if he had NOT been sent to the AFL if other teams send their best guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on the 40 man roster and where they are in the minors are two different things.

Whose roster is Matusz on? Orioles.com lists him on the O's 40 man, notes that he's not on the 25 man, and has no record of his being optioned to any of the minor league affiliates. So apparently he's not below AA - but he's not at or above AA, either. Maybe the Warehouse thinks it can save his fourth option by just being passive-aggressive and doing nothing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I’m going to preface this by saying (1) I expect to get crushed for bringing it up and (2) it shouldn’t impact trade deadline strategy.     I think Felix is going to pitch in the playoffs. There is nothing I have to go on other than gut feeling, in fact Elias has clearly stated otherwise. But I think that is what he is shooting for. I bring it up only on the premise of having a guy in the bullpen who could miss bats.  They could have him be a situational guy and leave Kimbrel where he is for this season. 
    • For Norfolk, Cook has started 29 games at 1B with a .996 fpct. and 5 games each at LF, CF, RF.   He started one game at 3B and made an error and at lower levels played a decent amount of 2B.   I think he’s probably an emergency/last resort guy at 2B/3B and @Tony-OH seems skeptical of his outfield defense in general.  Saying all that, with a LH heavy hitting OF he has a decent shot as soon as next year, especially if Norby gets moved.  Norby, with the ability to play LF/RF/2B would probably be his chief competitor for a backup role.  Also depends on what they do with Hays.
    • Your definition of what we need and @Bemorewins definiton of what we need may be different.    Getting a #3 starter he feels confident as a game #3 starter in the playoffs.   Who, in his mind, is that pitcher?   Fedde will not require one of those guys.  Crochet might.
    • We do not have to give up Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo to get what we need.
    • So you think Elias will give up one of the top 3 prospects to get upgrades?
    • “Dramatics”? That’s an interesting way of framing my opinion. I promise you I am as calm and cool as a cucumber. There’s no “dramatics” going on here. As you know, numbers fluctuate during any given period of time in the season. Good/great players have bad/cold stretches and bad/terrible players have good stretches. IMO we do not possess the type of top end talent at the back end of the bullpen needed to win multiple rounds against the best opposition in October.  If you are confident in Cano/Kimbrel or worse in Vespi/Baker/Perez/etc getting Soto and Judge out in a big spot late in the game in Yankee stadium in October, that is fine. I am not.  Just as an observer of baseball, Holmes is a much better pitcher than any reliever that we have. I would be much more confident in his talent than any reliever that we have. Now if we had Felix that would be one thing. But this season we do not. And I would hate for a team as good as ours to be held back by not making the needed/necessary move(s) before we get into October.  IMO we did that last season (with the starting pitching) and it didn’t end well. And I acknowledge that everybody doesn’t think like me nor have the same championship expectations/aspirations. Some fans/posters here have stated as much and that they are happy if we have a winning team year after year or if we just make it into the tournament year after year, regardless of results when we get there. And that’s fine. That’s just not my desired outcome. The great thing about this board is that we don’t have to agree and are able to express our opinions.
    • That’s right. Great times are here and more ahead with this group. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...