Jump to content

Ok, this is completely unreliable so don't trust it...but a couple rumors


safoster

Recommended Posts

Ok...

Don't flame me, but maybe bigbird can substantiate these rumors if they are true or shoot them down if they are not.

A friend of mine managed to run into an O's scout and asked him what we could possibly see with the trading deadline. According to this guy...

Ramon is essentially gone, they're trying to shop him hard.

Attempting to find a taker for Gibbons, though don't know who could possibly want him...

Not trading Roberts at the deadline, but could see him traded to the Cubs in the offseason for Rich Hill...

Again, don't trust them...just thought what he said was of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ok...

Don't flame me, but maybe bigbird can substantiate these rumors if they are true or shoot them down if they are not.

A friend of mine managed to run into an O's scout and asked him what we could possibly see with the trading deadline. According to this guy...

Ramon is essentially gone, they're trying to shop him hard.

Attempting to find a taker for Gibbons, though don't know who could possibly want him...

Not trading Roberts at the deadline, but could see him traded to the Cubs in the offseason for Rich Hill...

Again, don't trust them...just thought what he said was of interest.

Why would we trade Roberts for another SP? We have no one in our system that can come in and play 2b unless there's someone in FA that we're targeting, but I dont see any big names. I highly doubt Roberts get moved, he's becoming the face of this franchise....

As far as Ramon, I'm curious to see what type of value we could get for him in return. Maybe the FO has been making more progress with Weiters than what we're hearing...Gibby, no chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok...

Don't flame me, but maybe bigbird can substantiate these rumors if they are true or shoot them down if they are not.

A friend of mine managed to run into an O's scout and asked him what we could possibly see with the trading deadline. According to this guy...

Ramon is essentially gone, they're trying to shop him hard.

Attempting to find a taker for Gibbons, though don't know who could possibly want him...

Not trading Roberts at the deadline, but could see him traded to the Cubs in the offseason for Rich Hill...

Again, don't trust them...just thought what he said was of interest.

Hmmm...I wonder if the Ramon trade is the move that some folks say we're not going to like. I wouldn't mind it, depending what we get back. I'm assuming that if Ramon is moved, Wieters (if signed) will be on the fast track here. I would think that the Mets could be interested in Ramon.

I can't believe we'd find anyone to take Gibbons, either.

Trading Roberts for Rich Hill doesn't seem to make any sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Roberts for Rich Hill doesn't seem to make any sense to me.

I agree with you. I don't see much of a need there in Hill and a glaring loss with Roberts going elsewhere. I also tend to be wary of trading for NL pitchers, especially coming to the AL east. Maybe a MacPhail factor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm...I wonder if the Ramon trade is the move that some folks say we're not going to like. I wouldn't mind it, depending what we get back. I'm assuming that if Ramon is moved, Wieters (if signed) will be on the fast track here. I would think that the Mets could be interested in Ramon.

I can't believe we'd find anyone to take Gibbons, either.

Trading Roberts for Rich Hill doesn't seem to make any sense to me.

It might be Hill and Fontenot which would make sense. I'd much rather deal Roberts to the Mets if we were going to trade him. With Kendrick out with a broken finger the Angels might be another destination.

If Ramon is moved Wieters has to be up here next year. I don't know if that's too soon of a timeline or not...

I wonder if anybody is scouting O's players by any chance. Seeing NL scouts would be a dead giveaway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the idea of selling him now. Its not that I'm opposed to trading him, I'm just opposed to selling low. He's playing way below his average and can hit a lot better, but hes been battling injuries this year. Unless the FA knows something we don't know about his injury, he should stay and we can shop him in the offseason when his value will probably be higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. I don't see much of a need there in Hill and a glaring loss with Roberts going elsewhere. I also tend to be wary of trading for NL pitchers, especially coming to the AL east. Maybe a MacPhail factor?

I'm not worried about trading for NL pitchers, I just don't see how that deal would make sense for us. Hill is a good pitcher, who could be very good. I just don't see how this team, with the lack of offense, would trade one of their best hitters for a pitcher.

Unless, of course, they are planning on dealing Bedard for position players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about trading for NL pitchers, I just don't see how that deal would make sense for us. Hill is a good pitcher, who could be very good. I just don't see how this team, with the lack of offense, would trade one of their best hitters for a pitcher.

Unless, of course, they are planning on dealing Bedard for position players?

Hernandez and Hill

For

Salty and Kelly Johnson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. If Ramon is traded, I would think that a trade with the Braves is next to get Salty. I've got to admit that I haven't thought much about trading Ramon, but it isn't a bad idea. He would likely bring a pretty good return.

If that were true, it would kinda say to me that the O's aren't liking their chances of signing Weiters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's very important to remember that Wieters, as with any draft choice, is not a sure thing. I am a big proponent of procuring draft choices and building from within, but to annoit Wieters as a sure thing is risky.

I like Wieters a great deal, but if a great young (and ML-ready) prospect like Saltalamacchia is available, I would say we would be foolish to not consider acquiring him. If we sign Wieters and he looks like the second coming at Bowie, then we can deal with the wonderful issue of having two great young backstops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...