Jump to content

Win total over/under betting numbers


SteveA

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

20 teams have a betting line over .500.   Something’s gotta give there.    

Not really.  Add up all the totals and divide by 30 teams and you get exactly 30.  So it could work out.

Of the 20 teams over .500, 14 of them are between 30-30 and 33-27 so barely over .590.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, SteveA said:

Not really.  Add up all the totals and divide by 30 teams and you get exactly 30.  So it could work out.

Of the 20 teams over .500, 14 of them are between 30-30 and 33-27 so barely over .590.

I very much doubt 20 teams will be .500+.    If I were looking to make some money off the over/under, I’d probably bet the under on a group of teams.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2020 at 1:10 PM, OsEatAlEast said:

Sometimes I wonder if the O's pitching staff was so bad because of the tipping of pitches through tech. With the league at least giving lip service to it. Maybe all the homers O's pitching gives up will subside. One can hope I guess.

Really? Are you sure it had nothing to do with the terrible talent we were trotting out there daily?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Hays and Mountcastle tear it up this year and we get some average-ish pitching and guys like Ruiz and Sisco figure out major league hitting...this could be a .500 team if everything goes right and a bunch of stuff goes wrong for other teams. I wouldn’t count on it in a regular 162 game season but 60 games is pretty short and baseball is a funny game.

 

im not saying I would bet on it or anything lol...just seems like a possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CarrRun49 said:

Really? Are you sure it had nothing to do with the terrible talent we were trotting out there daily?

Hence I said "Sometimes I wonder". You can't just write it off like some teams weren't using tech to cheat. We just don't know how many.

O's should to look into using a Caesar cipher just to be sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2020 at 6:42 PM, OsEatAlEast said:

Hence I said "Sometimes I wonder". You can't just write it off like some teams weren't using tech to cheat. We just don't know how many.

O's should to look into using a Caesar cipher just to be sure.

Gabriel Ynoa, Dan Straily, Aaron Brooks and David Hess say differently.  There are more with 6.00-10.00 ERA guys there that I didn't bother to list.  I can write it off when we managed 2-3 guys that were league average (Means, Bundy and Cashner) and the others flat out stunk.  They were bad. Plain and simple.  If they're cheating, its not only being done when Aaron Brooks is on the mound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...