Jump to content

Deadline 2020 Rumors and News Orioles related


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Just now, Roll Tide said:

I know better ...But I'm just curious why a guy in a break out year, under control until 2025, cheap, and has good metrics defensively would not be worth much????

Because I don’t think the sample size is large enough yet.  Calling this a breakout year is a stretch considering how few at bats he has.  Last year, he had a sub 300 OBP and ended the year poorly.

He may be taking a leap but I don’t think anyone pays a big price assuming that’s the case for him right now.  It just doesn’t make sense to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Again, I never said Elias would deal Santander if the return wasn’t good.  I just said I doubt Santander is worth much in the open market.

@Sports Guy” I doubt we get much back for Santander.”
 

that is exactly what you said. Your comment means, “if we trade him we won’t get much back.” And I disagree. I think if we trade him we will get a lot back, and I do think he has considerable value. Whether it is enough to make Mike make the trade is another question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Because I don’t think the sample size is large enough yet.  Calling this a breakout year is a stretch considering how few at bats he has.  Last year, he had a sub 300 OBP and ended the year poorly.

He may be taking a leap but I don’t think anyone pays a big price assuming that’s the case for him right now.  It just doesn’t make sense to do so.

You might be right ...it will depend what else is available, desperation, teams budget constraints etc .... Saying Milwaukee wanted to add an outfielder. They have the option of a pending free agent and a guy like Santander. If they are trying to plug the hole once rather than a guy now and another guy in the offseason. I think we have a pretty good shot at good value if the right small market team needs a guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

You might be right ...it will depend what else is available, desperation, teams budget constraints etc .... Saying Milwaukee wanted to add an outfielder. They have the option of a pending free agent and a guy like Santander. If they are trying to plug the hole once rather than a guy now and another guy in the offseason. I think we have a pretty good shot at good value if the right small market team needs a guy.

I think a lot of teams are willing to pay for the lightning in the bottle. If Santandar did tire last season, that doesn’t have anything to do with this season,  which is a third the length. And the team that gets him can just trade him again in the off-season if his value increases, and even if it does not, he would still be a clear upgrade over the man he would be replacing. And that’s true on several teams.
My feeling is that I trust in Mike for the long term, even if he does things that I don’t like in the short term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Philip said:

@Sports Guy” I doubt we get much back for Santander.”
 

that is exactly what you said. Your comment means, “if we trade him we won’t get much back.” And I disagree. I think if we trade him we will get a lot back, and I do think he has considerable value. Whether it is enough to make Mike make the trade is another question.

You keep moving the goal posts in your argument.

I don’t even know what you are arguing.  First it was, Elias won’t deal him.(which I never insinuated otherwise)  now it’s he’s worth a lot.

Im not really sure why you keep going back to this and misrepresenting my point.

However, to go with just the point about his value.  I disagree.  I don’t see it.  He wasn’t that great last year and despite a very good start this year, it’s still a SSS for any team to give up considerable value..unless your definition of considerable value is far less than what I’m thinking you mean.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You keep moving the goal posts in your argument.

I don’t even know what you are arguing.  First it was, Elias won’t deal him.(which I never insinuated otherwise)  now it’s he’s worth a lot.

Im not really sure why you keep going back to this and misrepresenting my point.

However, to go with just the point about his value.  I disagree.  I don’t see it.  He wasn’t that great last year and despite a very good start this year, it’s still a SSS for any team to give up considerable value..unless your definition of considerable value is far less than what I’m thinking you mean.

 

You are mistaken. I never said Mike won’t trade Santander I actually think Mike will, but he won’t unless the return is to his liking. I’m not misrepresenting your point, I quoted you Word for Word. But we can leave it there, I actually think we agree, because we both think he won’t be traded unless the return is acceptable.

Where we disagree is that you think his value is not high and I think it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Philip said:

You are mistaken. I never said Mike won’t trade Santander I actually think Mike will, but he won’t unless the return is to his liking. I’m not misrepresenting your point, I quoted you Word for Word. But we can leave it there, I actually think we agree, because we both think he won’t be traded unless the return is acceptable.

Where we disagree is that you think his value is not high and I think it is.

What would a return on Santander look like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Philip said:

You are mistaken. I never said Mike won’t trade Santander I actually think Mike will, but he won’t unless the return is to his liking. I’m not misrepresenting your point, I quoted you Word for Word. But we can leave it there, I actually think we agree, because we both think he won’t be traded unless the return is acceptable.

Where we disagree is that you think his value is not high and I think it is.

Yes, you quoted me word for word and none of those words said that Elias would trade him even if he wasn’t getting much.

I never said that but you insinuated that I did.  
 

As for what you did quote..yes, I don’t think he has much value.  I think he has more value to the team than what any team would trade for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

But you think he has high value.  So what's high value?

That is a good question, and I can’t give you an immediate answer. I can only give you a general answer and that would be projecting his success over the next three years, and getting a return that is projected for a greater success?
I’ve made it clear throughout the entire discussion that I trust Mike however, so I will happily defer to him and his judgment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Philip said:

I have absolutely no idea. Mike does, though. And he won’t make a trade unless he gets what he wants

Of course he won't make a trade unless he gets what he wants.  You've said that a few times - as if it's something people don't already know.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If Elias could somehow magically combine Stowers and Kjerstad into one player, then the O's would really have something.  I think Kjerstad has a special bat, but his defense anywhere leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't know if Stowers can keep his Ks low enough to be an everyday player, but the O's should find out before Santander hits free agency.
    • Read the ninth post on page one I wrote. That should have been the last post in this dumpster fire of a thread. Lol
    • What if he bats .100 for the next month?
    • I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.
    • Back when we DFA'd Bauman, I said the right move would have been sending down Akin. He's just not very good. Sure he'll tease you with a month or two of good ball but he's very average. Cano is Cano. He had his 15 minutes of fame. He intimidates no one. And that's what you need from a high leverage guy. Vieira --- no need mincing words here --- he's not just a project, he stinks. Everyone has tried to fix his command issue and everyone has failed.  On the other hand, while he's no Bautista I don't mind rolling with Kimbrel this year. I like Coulombe. I think Perez, Webb and Tate are "ok".  The overall issue is that this bullpen isn't the bullpen a championship squad needs. Elias should have known that. Maybe he thought the offense and starting pitching would make up for our bullpen deficiencies. No team is perfect, I get that. I just don't know how a guy as bright as Elias thought this bullpen would be good enough coming out of Spring Training. Let's hope he makes some moves to get us a couple quality relievers.
    • From my understanding of the data the impetus for pulling pitchers early is not (usually) due to pitcher fatigue or pitcher injury risk, but rather because they're not as good the 3rd/4th time thru the lineup.  But I think I'd rather have our starters go from good to mediocre the 3rd time thru the lineup, versus trusting the crappy members of our bullpen with the ball.  Granted Akin had a bad game today and he had been pretty good, but we also tried to have Cionel get thru 2 innings and he gives up a leadoff triple.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...