Jump to content

Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?


Tony-OH

Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?

    • Baumann and Hall
    • Hall and Baumann
    • Hall and Henderson
    • Henderson and Hall
    • Henderson and Baumann

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I guess I wouldn't be totally shocked if Henderson made it here. The reports on him from Bowie were very nice. I'm sure Tony heard more. On the other hand, Baumann got shut down for an injury I don't know enough about. 

That said, Baumann had helium before being shut down. Power arm that really made positive steps last year. I have Hall at 5 and Baumann at 6. Not sure where Henderson fits in. If not here, I assume he's next, but could imagine a case for a guy like Kremer based on his ML success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diaz isn't even an option? That's who I would have thought would be here.

It's got to be Hall and Henderson then. Since both are really far away from the majors, you can't make a "more ready, more proven" argument here, so I think Hall is #5 based on his ceiling and Henderson is #6

Could have seen the argument for Baumann if he didn't just go down with a flexor mass strain. That's a really bad sign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, cnmilton said:

With Tony earlier stating that DL Hall struggles with both command and control, I am thinking the Baumann has surpassed Hall on the Hangout prospects list. I also think Gunnar has moved higher on the list.  Baumann and Henderson is my guess.

I was thinking that as well. Did Baumann or Zimmerman have the AA no hitter? I thought it was Zimmerman,  but he’s nowhere to be seen yet, and his debut was kind of meh.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to choose against Baumann because of his injury. Hall has control problems and those are really tough to fix, but he still has TOR potential, so I can’t see him falling far yet. Henderson is just a kid. Is he even 20 yet? But he’s the option, so he gets it. Hall- Henderson... and Harry..

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suddenly DL Hall is like Aaron Rodgers in the green room on draft night.

Baumann's great unknowable kind of raises the question of how to factor possible injury into prospect lists.  I do feel like Bowie Baumann 2019 did a lot to pitch away from the Kremer/Akin peloton up towards the lead pack, and would love to see a Hall head to head evaluation in a fair fight.  Alas TINSTAAPP - just hopes for good results when throwing in earnest commences next spring.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Diaz isn't even an option? That's who I would have thought would be here.

It's got to be Hall and Henderson then. Since both are really far away from the majors, you can't make a "more ready, more proven" argument here, so I think Hall is #5 based on his ceiling and Henderson is #6

Could have seen the argument for Baumann if he didn't just go down with a flexor mass strain. That's a really bad sign

Diaz should already be in the majors, right @Can_of_corn ? ☺️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll go Hall then Henderson.   Reports about Hall’s wildness concern me, but he’s still got a TOR repertoire and is young and athletic enough to overcome the control issues.    Plenty of risk there, but enough upside to leave him at 5.    Henderson drew raves from Matt Blood and others based on his Bowie performance, and Eric-OH’s reports during spring training also were glowing.    So, I’m putting him at 6 even though Baumann is also a very strong candidate for that spot.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I will say this without giving this away. From 5-7, I could have put them in any order and been able to build a solid case for that order. 

I think this is sad.   So DL Hall will fall from 3 to 5-7.   The O's rebuild depends on the O's developing front of the rotation starters.   Hall falling does not bode well for the rebuild IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...