Jump to content

Orioles claim Yolmer Sanchez


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Is there even a stat kept for “unearned runs scored off the infield?”   If so, I’ve never seen it.   

Of course defense is important.   It’s logical that it’s less important when 24.5 balls per game are being put in play per game (2020) than when 27.4 balls per game are being put in play (1970).   And the value of infield defense is further diluted when the percentage of balls hit in the air increases.    The ratio of ground outs to air outs is 1.00 today compared to 1.08 in 1970.   So figure infield defense is arguably about 15% less important today than it was in 1970. 

I don’t know if there’s a split between infield unearned runs and Outfield unearned runs, But just watching the games from day today makes it clear that the infield gives up a lot of runs that they shouldn’t have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLBTR mentioned in their Iglesias notes that Sanchez could be a signal that they may walk from Hanser. I hope they are wrong as to me Sanchez is just a weak hitting Utility player. His OPS was 100 points lower than Alberto in 2019 and Sanchez got almost no at bats this year (16). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His 2019 was very bad offensively. He was better (though still not good) in 2017-2018. I really think this is all about defense. The Orioles don't have many prospects ready in the infield save for maybe Vavra and Bannon. The Orioles are getting Vavra reps in the OF showing they are not all-in on him as an everyday player at 2B and Bannon seems to be an afterthought as well.

If we are not going to give it to young players to see what we got, I'm all on board for giving it to a great defender to help run prevention for what I hope to be a plethora of youngsters on the mound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope they keep Alberto too.  I think between Iglesias, Alberto, Sanchez, Ruiz, Urias, Martin, and Wilkerson you can put together a real nice unit of 2B/SS/3B/UTI.  You have the depth to survive a few injuries and space for some guys to get more seasoning in AAA.  Plus, as people have mentioned, you may be able to trade Iglesias (or even Alberto) mid-season.

I also like that they now have Sanchez controlled through 2022.  I still think Elias is going to compete for a wild card spot in 2022.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jamalshw said:

His 2019 was very bad offensively. He was better (though still not good) in 2017-2018. I really think this is all about defense. The Orioles don't have many prospects ready in the infield save for maybe Vavra and Bannon. The Orioles are getting Vavra reps in the OF showing they are not all-in on him as an everyday player at 2B and Bannon seems to be an afterthought as well.

If we are not going to give it to young players to see what we got, I'm all on board for giving it to a great defender to help run prevention for what I hope to be a plethora of youngsters on the mound.

FWIW, Sanchez is a switch hitter with a stronger platoon split vs. RHP (.670 compared to .626 vs. LHP). That's superior to Alberto's .591 vs. RHP (compared to .831 vs. RHP). Could feasibly shift Alberto into more of a platoon role with the ability to PH late in games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

FWIW, Sanchez is a switch hitter with a stronger platoon split vs. RHP (.670 compared to .626 vs. LHP). That's superior to Alberto's .591 vs. RHP (compared to .831 vs. RHP). Could feasibly shift Alberto into more of a platoon role with the ability to PH late in games.

That will depend on whether the Orioles want to pay Sanchez's and Alberto's arbitration salaries to split the position. As a fan, I'm not opposed to the idea. I just wonder if the Orioles will willingly pay both players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2020 at 9:42 AM, jamalshw said:

That will depend on whether the Orioles want to pay Sanchez's and Alberto's arbitration salaries to split the position. As a fan, I'm not opposed to the idea. I just wonder if the Orioles will willingly pay both players.

That's definitely fair. Could be more of a situation where it's not a straight platoon in that Sanchez is playing other places as well (maybe they both play ~65-70% of PA total as a result).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I respect your opinion and your research. I hope it’s only $5 million the rest of the way so that he’s actually an option for us. With him making a second healthy successful start, I assume the definite details of what is owed will be talk about here soon.  He’s going to be #1 on all the sites/platforms of players most likely to be trade or best available. However they word it.  So the question is… Is McDermott enough to outbid all of baseball, and would we be comfortable with that?  Assuming the Rangers would want pitching for pitching as most teams do. 
    • Good thread.  I hadn’t realized he was on a roll like this.  Hopefully, he keeps it up.  Definitely an option this year and next.
    • Amparo made it to at least 49 PA with a strikeout but he went down once yesterday so the no K streaks are over.  Felix Amparo just edged out Adriander Mejia for the most PA without striking out.
    • they could also reward batting discipline by forcing pitchers to throw real strikes with at least a robo challenge system
    • Perfect, let’s go get him AND Verlander! 
    • I didn’t catch it myself but someone pointed out that Matthew Etzel did not make the top 45.   That’s either an oversight or just plain ridiculous.
    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...