Jump to content

Frederick Dropped


weams

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Yes but not sure any of the other locations have the size or facilities to be a AA team.  They also jumped Aberdeen to high A and kept Delmarva as low A telling me stadium and facilities played a bigger role in the decision then location.

I feel like the Frederick stadium is pretty nice though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Me too. Bowie is a Washington suburb while Frederick is half way to both. Basically what they've done is lose an area that will now have young people moving toward the Gnats because they have been a winning team while the Oriole wallow in last place and battle for the 1st pick in the draft every year.

I am glad to see Aberdeen get picked up as a full season club. 

 

41 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Bad Orioles decision! I would have let go of Bowie as its closer to the Gnats

I think you both have the conclusion backwards. Orioles would prefer to keep Bowie specifically because it’s contested territory. Similar to the “this is birdland” billboard on 295S as you enter DC. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

 

I think you both have the conclusion backwards. Orioles would prefer to keep Bowie specifically because it’s contested territory. Similar to the “this is birdland” billboard on 295S as you enter DC. 

You don't think Frederick is contested territory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That sucks.  Expected, but it sucks. 

In a perfect world this contraction would be an opening for real competitive, maybe even higher level independent leagues.  But I think that ship sailed a long time ago.  Way before I was born.  At best some of the dropped teams will join leagues like the Atlantic League, made up mostly of A- and AA-caliber talent in their late 20s.  Or this Draft League... I guess.

I assume you heard that Bluefield and other teams in its league are being converted into a wooden bat college league run under the auspices of MLB?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Me too. Bowie is a Washington suburb while Frederick is half way to both. Basically what they've done is lose an area that will now have young people moving toward the Gnats because they have been a winning team while the Oriole wallow in last place and battle for the 1st pick in the draft every year.

I am glad to see Aberdeen get picked up as a full season club. 

So will Delmarva now be our high A and Aberden our low A?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Not to the same degree. Much much smaller population-wise than central Maryland (including Bowie) as well. 

One area is at about max capacity, the other is the fastest growing area in the state and about 45 minutes from both Nats and O's stadiums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed funny to me that MLB announced the 5 Draft league teams with a caveat that they were in negotiations for a sixth team.  I think the Orioles were trying everything they could to get Frederick into the Draft league just so they wouldn’t let the Nationals swoop in and gobble up the Keys.  
 

I think the orioles missed an excellent opportunity here.  Norfolk although reasonably close to Baltimore by most AAA standards is a bit of a hike for as much as the O’s use it and it is closer to the Nationals anyway.  Everyone knows the Nats were looking to upgrade from Fresno and move on from Hagerstown.  The O’s should have negotiated the Nats to have Norfolk and upgraded one of the MD affiliate stadiums to fit AAA.  That way the O’s lock down MD while surrendering VA which wasn’t a good fit anyhow.  Unfortunately this would have taken some adults to be present in the room so alas this plan had no shot.

Edited by fitzi22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Me too. Bowie is a Washington suburb while Frederick is half way to both. Basically what they've done is lose an area that will now have young people moving toward the Gnats because they have been a winning team while the Oriole wallow in last place and battle for the 1st pick in the draft every year.

I am glad to see Aberdeen get picked up as a full season club. 

Bowie is closer to Baltimore than Frederick is, and like Frederick, is pretty close to equidistant to both cities. Prince George's Stadium is 27.3 miles to Camden Yards and 20.6 miles to Nats Park (driving distance).

With the respective traffic of the two cities, it is almost always a faster drive to Bowie from Baltimore than DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, fitzi22 said:

 The O’s should have negotiated the Nats to have Norfolk and upgraded one of the MD affiliate stadiums to fit AAA.  

Not sure what qualifications are required for a AAA ballpark these days.  The Astros AAA team is now in Sugar Land, TX, with 7500 seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, fitzi22 said:

It seemed funny to me that MLB announced the 5 Draft league teams with a caveat that they were in negotiations for a sixth team.  I think the Orioles were trying everything they could to get Frederick into the Draft league just so they wouldn’t let the Nationals swoop in and gobble up the Keys.  
 

I think the orioles missed an excellent opportunity here.  Norfolk although reasonably close to Baltimore by most AAA standards is a bit of a hike for as much as the O’s use it and it is closer to the Nationals anyway.  Everyone knows the Nats were looking to upgrade from Fresno and move on from Hagerstown.  The O’s should have negotiated the Nats to have Norfolk and upgraded one of the MD affiliate stadiums to fit AAA.  That way the O’s lock down MD while surrendering VA which wasn’t a good fit anyhow.  Unfortunately this would have taken some adults to be present in the room so alas this plan had no shot.

The O's obviously realized this stuff when making the decision. 

My assumption was always that the presence of a MiL team would create fan loyalty to the ML team. I wonder if I'm over reacting to that point.

As markets go, Aberdeen is the outlier here. Frederick, Bowie, Salisbury and Norfolk all seem to be much more strategically important from a market perspective. I guess Aberdeen is more important from a Ripken, and maybe facility, perspective.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DirtyBird said:

One area is at about max capacity, the other is the fastest growing area in the state and about 45 minutes from both Nats and O's stadiums.

There are 3.7 million people within a 25 mile radius of Bowie compared to 734,000 within a 25 mile radius of Frederick. Even if you want to cut that to 15 miles to eliminate DC and parts of Baltimore, there are 1.3 million people within a 15 mile radius of Bowie and 207,000 within a 15 mile radius of Frederick.

The two markets aren't remotely comparable. 

I love going to games in Frederick too, and I will probably check out the draft league there this season, but there was absolutely no way the Orioles were ever going to give up Bowie. 

Prince George's Stadium drew 14,000 people for the 2000 AA All-Star game, and its current capacity of 10,000 wouldn't make it the smallest AAA park. It could certainly be expanded to be a AAA stadium.

Ripken Stadium has a capacity of 6,300. If Aberdeen were to replace Bowie in the Eastern League, it would be 7th of 12 stadiums in capacity.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...