Jump to content

Adley starts at DH today


wildcard

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, interloper said:

No, I don't think college ball is worthless at all, I'm just asking for like one half season of ABs to confirm that, yes, the guy can hit. Let him get comfortable playing every day. It's been quite literally years since he's done that. If he looks good, by all means bring him up. 

What's the last team to put a guy this highly touted on their ML squad with 130 AB of low A experience? 

Harper has under 500 career at bats in the minors and he spent one year in community college. 

Rendon has had 309 career at bats in the minors.

Posey has had 631 career at bats in the minors.

Those guys didn't get to spend a half a season in the type of environment Adley was in.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You didn't hear?

Davis is injured.

Probably the only reason Adley is getting the start.

I know this is probably sarcasm but it wouldn't surprise me if it were true. It almost reminds me of when in the Buck era they would "hide" starters in the spring. Like why? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Harper has under 500 career at bats in the minors and he spent one year in community college. 

Rendon has had 309 career at bats in the minors.

Posey has had 631 career at bats in the minors.

Those guys didn't get to spend a half a season in the type of environment Adley was in.

 

 

I don't know that there is a 1:1 comp between college and the minor leagues in terms of both competition and instruction. Ultimately I just think it would be super weird to have a guy go from college to the bigs without so much as a half season of minor league ball. On a pure precedent level, you just don't really see it, fair or not. That said, I get that he's now a year older with a missed season under his belt so there's more urgency to get him up here. 

Ultimately, I don't feel super strongly about this. Personally, I want to see proof that he can hit in AA. I get your position though for sure. If he was called up for Game 1 of the regular season, great, I'm excited about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, andrewochs615 said:

I know this is probably sarcasm but it wouldn't surprise me if it were true. It almost reminds me of when in the Buck era they would "hide" starters in the spring. Like why? 

I mean Davis is actually injured.

No idea if he would be playing over AR if he was healthy.  Hyde did say he would be trying to get Davis as many at bats as possible so maybe it's an accurate statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

I don't know that there is a 1:1 comp between college and the minor leagues in terms of both competition and instruction. Ultimately I just think it would be super weird to have a guy go from college to the bigs without so much as a half season of minor league ball. On a pure precedent level, you just don't really see it, fair or not. That said, I get that he's now a year older with a missed season under his belt so there's more urgency to get him up here. 

Ultimately, I don't feel super strongly about this. Personally, I want to see proof that he can hit in AA. I get your position though for sure. If he was called up for Game 1 of the regular season, great, I'm excited about it. 

But you did.

We don't see it much not because of the money involved.  Posters came up with a list of guys that did it back in the day.  If anything college baseball is much stronger now then it was when Pete Incaviglia made the jump.

If he's a bust at AA do you just keep him there all season?  Next season?  Demote him?  Promote him anyway and hope for the best?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't know that there is a 1:1 comp between college and the minor leagues in terms of both competition and instruction. Ultimately I just think it would be super weird to have a guy go from college to the bigs without so much as a half season of minor league ball. On a pure precedent level, you just don't really see it, fair or not. That said, I get that he's now a year older with a missed season under his belt so there's more urgency to get him up here. 

Ultimately, I don't feel super strongly about this. Personally, I want to see proof that he can hit in AA. I get your position though for sure. If he was called up for Game 1 of the regular season, great, I'm excited about it. 

At least one mitigating factor is the 1/3 season at the alternate site. Arguably the level of competition there was somewhere around AA-plus. If he was dominating there, they may have seen enough to promote him straight to the bigs. I kind of doubt it, but it's possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But you did.

We don't see it much not because of the money involved.  Posters came up with a list of guys that did it back in the day.  If anything college baseball is much stronger now then it was when Pete Incaviglia made the jump.

If he's a bust at AA do you just keep him there all season?  Next season?  Demote him?  Promote him anyway and hope for the best?

I think you probably eventually call him up based on his defensive pedigree. I think it's absolutely possible the kid just does not hit. It happens. We haven't seen him hit to date, but again, the sample is just too small to know much of anything about him in a pro setting. 

If he doesn't hit but his defense is good, you call him up anyway because he'll help the team and you hope it just clicks eventually. But the O's are under no obligation to call him up ever if he's no good. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

We haven't seen him hit to date

He hit very well at Aberdeen after initially struggling/being sick. That's what I'm pretty confident would've happened in Delmarva if he got more at bats. However, I'd like to see some AA at bats. Just sucks that the season isn't starting until May. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Your definition of what we need and @Bemorewins definiton of what we need may be different.    Getting a #3 starter he feels confident as a game #3 starter in the playoffs.   Who, in his mind, is that pitcher?   Fedde will not require one of those guys.  Crochet might.
    • We do not have to give up Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo to get what we need.
    • So you think Elias will give up one of the top 3 prospects to get upgrades?
    • “Dramatics”? That’s an interesting way of framing my opinion. I promise you I am as calm and cool as a cucumber. There’s no “dramatics” going on here. As you know, numbers fluctuate during any given period of time in the season. Good/great players have bad/cold stretches and bad/terrible players have good stretches. IMO we do not possess the type of top end talent at the back end of the bullpen needed to win multiple rounds against the best opposition in October.  If you are confident in Cano/Kimbrel or worse in Vespi/Baker/Perez/etc getting Soto and Judge out in a big spot late in the game in Yankee stadium in October, that is fine. I am not.  Just as an observer of baseball, Holmes is a much better pitcher than any reliever that we have. I would be much more confident in his talent than any reliever that we have. Now if we had Felix that would be one thing. But this season we do not. And I would hate for a team as good as ours to be held back by not making the needed/necessary move(s) before we get into October.  IMO we did that last season (with the starting pitching) and it didn’t end well. And I acknowledge that everybody doesn’t think like me nor have the same championship expectations/aspirations. Some fans/posters here have stated as much and that they are happy if we have a winning team year after year or if we just make it into the tournament year after year, regardless of results when we get there. And that’s fine. That’s just not my desired outcome. The great thing about this board is that we don’t have to agree and are able to express our opinions.
    • That’s right. Great times are here and more ahead with this group. 
    • Over/under on the number of times we walk Judge and Soto in this series?   10?  Nobody else really worries me.  
    • 2 days in a row we got some help from the RedSox
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...