Jump to content

How long do the O’s need to be bad


kidrock

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

The upcoming FA class is loaded. It would be interesting to see if they maybe pounce for someone. I'm not sure if the O's have a true MLB SS on the farm, and this FA class is as plentiful with SS-stars as there has ever been.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2021/04/2021-22-mlb-free-agent-power-rankings-2.html

Unfortunately Lindor is off the board. Correa reunion with Elias makes a lot of sense. Elias apparently prioritizing OF and pitching makes you think free agency might be the plan for infield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa Bay is a better run Org than Baltimore.  Yet they have still not won a World Series even though they have been to two since we last won one in 1983.

The Orioles were able to have one of the best records in baseball over a 5 year stretch while having almost no foreign talent pool and a micromanaging owner.  Oh and a manager and owner's lackey who often meddled with the GM.

It seems to me that when we are terrible we make too much of the financial abilities of NY BOS and to an extent TOR.  

The model should be Baltimore...not Tampa, not St. Louis and it will never be NY or Boston.  We need to acquire, develop and EVALUATE talent at an elite level.  If we do that, we can compete.  And I think a model that is elite recognizing and developing talent, can also then manage the contracts that should be extended and vice versa.  

Yes all of this is extremely oversimplified.  But so be it.  That's what we need.  Are we on track?  My magic 8 ball says:  "Ask again later!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

3.  The economic landscape wouldn't be nearly so damaging if they'd just get rid of the stupid unbalanced schedule.  For Baltimore and TB to have to have a schedule so loaded against NYY, BOS and TOR is ridiculous.  Toronto is a sleeping giant financially.

 

The unbalanced schedule is totally unfair when teams are competing for wild-card berths. MLB needs to return to a balance schedule to ensure competitive balance, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Unfortunately Lindor is off the board. Correa reunion with Elias makes a lot of sense. Elias apparently prioritizing OF and pitching makes you think free agency might be the plan for infield. 

I will boo Correa every time he steps to the plate in an Orioles uniform if that were to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kidrock said:

It seems like that the only possible way that the O’s (or most teams for that matter) can compete is by building an elite farm system.  Given how hard and how slow that process is, I wanted to ask the O’s experts on here a few simple question for discussion:  

1. how long would you estimate that it takes for a team to go from a mediocre/poor farm system, to a system that has produced enough major league talent to win in the AL east?  Additionally, how long in your opinion does the pro club need to suck while building the farm.

2. is there a team that you would prefer that the O’s model their approach after?  Is it Tampa?  Toronto? St. Louis?  I think the Tampa model is the most brutally efficient, but I can’t see many people truly being happy with that model in the long haul (getting rid of good players while value is high, rarely spending a dollar in FA).

3. do you like the financial model of baseball as opposed to other professional leagues?  Baseball has always been my favorite sport, but it really seems to favor the larger market teams in the end.  Not that smaller market teams can’t compete, it’s just that every year it seems the larger market teams win.  I know there are some poor large market orgs, but I personally get disinterested when I see how imbalanced the competitive landscape can be at times.

 

1.  4-5 years.   See Houston.  We already have gone from having a terrible farm system to a top 5.....so the progress is clearly being made.

2.  Houston.  Minus the cheating of course.

3.  No.  But it is what it is.  I think most rational actors agree there should be a salary "cap" and "floor" in MLB.   Hopefully I am able to live to see the day.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Just curious why? I haven't followed him closely enough to like or dislike. Just the cheating thing? 

The cheating is the genesis of it all. Afterwards instead of apologizing he chose to be abrasive and act like they were victims. He seems to be roundly disliked around baseball.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The modification I would like to see to the Tampa model, would be that the O's would sign young stars/top prospects to under market deals and keep them for the most part instead of trading them for more prospects. 

That’s closer to the White Sox model . And I agree it’s the way to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, survivedc said:

The cheating is the genesis of it all. Afterwards instead of apologizing he chose to be abrasive and act like they were victims. He seems to be roundly disliked around baseball.

Correa is a gamer and we’d be lucky to have him. The only knock on him is durability.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, joelala said:

Correa is a gamer and we’d be lucky to have him. The only knock on him is durability.

He’s a jerk. There’s no denying his talent, but there are a few talented guys at the same position that don’t carry the baggage. I want guys I can root for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, survivedc said:

He’s a jerk. There’s no denying his talent, but there are a few talented guys at the same position that don’t carry the baggage. I want guys I can root for.

You wouldn’t want a guy who defends his teammates and the org? I get the whole cheating thing looks bad, but maybe it just doesn’t bother me as much as a lot of other people. And everything I’ve read about Correa is that he’s a great teammate and an extremely hard worker. Sign me up if the price is right. What specifically makes him a jerk? When I think of a player who was a jerk I think of someone like Aubrey Huff, not Correa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, survivedc said:

He’s a jerk. There’s no denying his talent, but there are a few talented guys at the same position that don’t carry the baggage. I want guys I can root for.

Lots of guys are jerks.  From all I have heard Mussina was a jerk.  Loved having him on the team.

A LOT of folks think Machado is a jerk.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • And that team still didn't win anything, and neither did any other team except Texas. Must be nice to hang your hat on something that has 29 out of 30 possibility of happening
    • You don’t he adds anyone?    This pen is not as bad as Texas was last year. They pitched well in playoffs.   You would think the team ERA is 12th in the AL. The playoffs start in a little over 3 months. It’s about getting there. Who is healthy and throwing well 3 months from now is what matters. 
    • From what I've been reading those are rare as hen's teeth right now.
    • By no small margin, the chances of a drafted player making the majors for more than a cup of coffee are significantly better with a position player (and particularly a skill position player) than with a pitcher. And the higher the draft position, the greater the differential. So if one were to craft a strategy around this observation, it might be to load up on skill position players that seem to have big bat potential, and use them not only to stock your own club, but to acquire pitching later via trade (after other teams have assumed the risk of vetting the pitching for you). This startegy also affords you the ability of "selling high" on the better seasons of your MLB position players, in later arb. To some extent this appears to be what Elias is doing (although he doesn't seem to have mastered the "selling high" part..  I would also suggest that he would be better served by attempting to acquire a larger portion of promising AAA arms for his stockpile of position players, than trying to acquire MLB arms. That said,  the strategy only works if you actually TRADE the talent proactively, rather than waiting for logjams to occur, and for your MLB talent to reach FA
    • They are too good a team for this to continue.  Right now it is something different every night.  They hit and the pitching sucks.  Pitching is good and the bats are cold.  Throw-in some occasional bad defense, 4 unearned runs last night and you get a losing streak. The 83 O's had 2 seven game losing streaks to keep things in perspective. 
    • The good thing about the current playoff setup is that you do not have to panic.  Back when only the division winners made the playoffs, you could not fall too far behind.  After losing 5 games in a row, the O's are still only 2 games out of first for the division and are 7 games up in the wildcard.   Elias has to wait over the next month to see exactly what the team needs.  If you try to make a trade at this time, you are going to overpay because the other teams are waiting for the deadline to hope a team becomes desperate.  You also have the issue of a most of the NL teams being in contention for the wildcard, not many sellers out there.  In another month, hopefully a few more NL teams realize they need to sell and that widens the trade market hopefully driving the price down for what has to be given up.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...