Jump to content

How far are the O's away from being a winning team?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Fantasy appeal aside, I just feel like a few innings in the middle of game would be the better deployment.   He's reinvented himself, and I think is a SP in his own mind.   He got humored this spring, but I don't think given a real chance.    I suspect his command would be better in innings 2-4 as the saying about "if you are going to get the SP, get him in the 1st".   

Obviously the sample sizes are even smaller, but he has scuffled in his back-to-backs, which if it persists I would fault him for no more than I fault Jorge Lopez for getting rocked third time through the order.    I was just racing through DVR and not in Game Thread so didn't grasp if Pillar's hot shot to Ruiz opening the inning was in the "Manny would have had it, but you can't really blame the 3B" zone, or a bad play.

Days of Rest -- Game-Level

Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO9 SO/W
0 Days,GR 0 1 .000 7.71 3 0 3 0 0 2 2.1 5 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 15 2.571 7.7 2.00
1 Day,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 1 0 0 1 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0.000 13.5  
2 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 3.60 5 0 3 0 0 2 5.0 5 2 2 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 23 1.400 10.8 3.00
3 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0.857 11.6  
5 Days,GR 0 0   0.00 1 0 1 0 0 1 1.1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0.750 6.8  
6+ Days,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0.500 13.5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

No closer converts 72.7% of his save opportunities and keeps his job for long.    That’s three blown saves in 11 chances.   I’m not saying he should be yanked from the job at this point, but I’m not as enamored of him as a lot of others apparently are.   

You’re right that there’s no obvious candidate to replace him.   Scott in the closer role is the last thing I’d want to see.    I’d rather try Fry.   
 

Fry is doing well this year.  He'd probably be the one to replace Valdez.  

Didn't realize Valdez had blown 3 in 11 chances this year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Fantasy appeal aside, I just feel like a few innings in the middle of game would be the better deployment.   He's reinvented himself, and I think is a SP in his own mind.   He got humored this spring, but I don't think given a real chance.    I suspect his command would be better in innings 2-4 as the saying about "if you are going to get the SP, get him in the 1st".   

Obviously the sample sizes are even smaller, but he has scuffled in his back-to-backs, which if it persists I would fault him for no more than I fault Jorge Lopez for getting rocked third time through the order.    I was just racing through DVR and not in Game Thread so didn't grasp if Pillar's hot shot to Ruiz opening the inning was in the "Manny would have had it, but you can't really blame the 3B" zone, or a bad play.

Days of Rest -- Game-Level

Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO9 SO/W
0 Days,GR 0 1 .000 7.71 3 0 3 0 0 2 2.1 5 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 15 2.571 7.7 2.00
1 Day,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 1 0 0 1 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0.000 13.5  
2 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 3.60 5 0 3 0 0 2 5.0 5 2 2 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 23 1.400 10.8 3.00
3 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0.857 11.6  
5 Days,GR 0 0   0.00 1 0 1 0 0 1 1.1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0.750 6.8  
6+ Days,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0.500 13.5

 

Let's just say that Franco would not have fielded cleanly either.  Manny and Arenado - sure!  Pillar is an Oriole killer from way back as deigned by the "baseball gods".  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Fantasy appeal aside, I just feel like a few innings in the middle of game would be the better deployment.   He's reinvented himself, and I think is a SP in his own mind.   He got humored this spring, but I don't think given a real chance.    I suspect his command would be better in innings 2-4 as the saying about "if you are going to get the SP, get him in the 1st".   

Obviously the sample sizes are even smaller, but he has scuffled in his back-to-backs, which if it persists I would fault him for no more than I fault Jorge Lopez for getting rocked third time through the order.    I was just racing through DVR and not in Game Thread so didn't grasp if Pillar's hot shot to Ruiz opening the inning was in the "Manny would have had it, but you can't really blame the 3B" zone, or a bad play.

Days of Rest -- Game-Level

Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO9 SO/W
0 Days,GR 0 1 .000 7.71 3 0 3 0 0 2 2.1 5 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 15 2.571 7.7 2.00
1 Day,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 1 0 0 1 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0.000 13.5  
2 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 3.60 5 0 3 0 0 2 5.0 5 2 2 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 23 1.400 10.8 3.00
3 Days,GR 1 0 1.000 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0.857 11.6  
5 Days,GR 0 0   0.00 1 0 1 0 0 1 1.1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0.750 6.8  
6+ Days,GR 0 0   0.00 2 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0.500 13.5

 

So I don't think they have to replace Valdez as closer.  They just have to supplement him with someone so he does not pitch back to back days.     I  agree   Fry would be someone good to try in that role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My post about Valdez was not to be a knock on him or what he has done this season.  The point I was trying to make is that teams that are looking to be contenders make a point to have a strong closer and back end of the bullpen which is why trade prices for those guys over the past few years have been so high.

The Orioles opened this season with an unproven closer and question marks in the bullpen. That to me is a sign that they are not ready to be a winning team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

My post about Valdez was not to be a knock on him or what he has done this season.  The point I was trying to make is that teams that are looking to be contenders make a point to have a strong closer and back end of the bullpen which is why trade prices for those guys over the past few years have been so high.

The Orioles opened this season with an unproven closer and question marks in the bullpen. That to me is a sign that they are not ready to be a winning team. 

Sure, having a 35 year old changeup artist as your closer is an issue but it is the least of our concerns. We also have issues in OF defense, IF defense, overall offense, starting rotation after Means, etc.

As far as really competing, biggest concern to me is middle infield prospects. We are set at C, we have some really good SP prospects, we have some options for OF. What we really need is a stud SS. Bullpen arm is one hole that isn't too hard to fill through free agency when the time comes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Sure, having a 35 year old changeup artist as your closer is an issue but it is the least of our concerns. We also have issues in OF defense, IF defense, overall offense, starting rotation after Means, etc.

As far as really competing, biggest concern to me is middle infield prospects. We are set at C, we have some really good SP prospects, we have some options for OF. What we really need is a stud SS. Bullpen arm is one hole that isn't too hard to fill through free agency when the time comes. 

Gunnar Henderson is tearing it up. Even if he moves to 3B there's Westburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been imagining an unrealistic best case scenario where we hover around .500 for the next few months and then call up Hall, Rutschman, and Jones. Add in a healthy Santander and I could see a pretty decent team. Hall is certainly doing his part, and Santander is back soon. But Adley's bat and Jones' glove are squashing that fantasy. It's weird, if we can't be good this year I'd just assume we lock in one more high draft slot. Which all means we'll end up with a blah record and a blah pick of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...