Jump to content

2022 early look top prospects


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, ExileAngelos said:

I think there are PLENTY of examples in recent years.  Just look at the Jays roster.  Are you seriously saying that Andrew Jones being his dad doesn't impact whether he will hit as a prospect?

Yes that’s what I’m saying.  There are more examples of failures than hits.  
 

There is zero evidence that suggests what you are saying has any truth behind it.  Yea, it’s nice that they can learn from their dads but it doesn’t mean they will have their abilities and talents.

If you take Druw Jones, which as of now is the guy I think they should take, it’s because you feel he’s the best player with the highest ceiling.  You don’t take him because of his dad.  That makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes that’s what I’m saying.  There are more examples of failures than hits.  
 

There is zero evidence that suggests what you are saying has any truth behind it.  Yea, it’s nice that they can learn from their dads but it doesn’t mean they will have their abilities and talents.

If you take Druw Jones, which as of now is the guy I think they should take, it’s because you feel he’s the best player with the highest ceiling.  You don’t take him because of his dad.  That makes no sense.

I think you are both right. Having an MLB dad can help, but it depends on the kid, the tools, and their relationship. Did the kid hang around dad, the clubhouse, other players, etc… growing up? It can raise the floor, sure. It can certainly help the baseball IQ, the work ethic, the level of instruction and such in some cases, but not every case. The player still has to have talent. The ones you mentioned had almost zero talent. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, an honest question for the board. For me, I have concerns about Termarr Johnson and his body type. He is a thick-legged squatty 5-08, at best, short-levered 2B who will likely get bigger (not taller) and slower. Why should we take that profile at 1-1, even if he is a legit 70 hitter, over a guy like Druw Jones?

For me, I favor Druw and his overall profile and ceiling. I look at Johnson and doubt that his speed and athleticism will be a part of his game, based on his body type, into his mid 20’s. So, you have to believe his hit tool and power will carry below average defense at 2B during his arbitration years. Maybe I am wrong to project him in such a way, but that is my concern with him. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

So, an honest question for the board. For me, I have concerns about Termarr Johnson and his body type. He is a thick-legged squatty 5-08, at best, short-levered 2B who will likely get bigger (not taller) and slower. Why should we take that profile at 1-1, even if he is a legit 70 hitter, over a guy like Druw Jones?

For me, I favor Druw and his overall profile and ceiling. I look at Johnson and doubt that his speed and athleticism will be a part of his game, based on his body type, into his mid 20’s. So, you have to believe his hit tool and power will carry below average defense at 2B during his arbitration years. Maybe I am wrong to project him in such a way, but that is my concern with him. 

I've seen nothing that makes me think that he will be below average at 2B during the time in which he would be under team control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I've seen nothing that makes me think that he will be below average at 2B during the time in which he would be under team control.

Just looking at his body type, current athleticism level and the normal progression. Like I said, maybe I am wrong, but that is my concern with him.

Watch him move now. Not a quick twitchy guy, like say a Kirby Puckett was. His feet and lateral movement are average, at best, right now. The hands and arm are not bad, average or so. Maybe I am wrong, but at 1-1, I go elsewhere if I am picking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

So, an honest question for the board. For me, I have concerns about Termarr Johnson and his body type. He is a thick-legged squatty 5-08, at best, short-levered 2B who will likely get bigger (not taller) and slower. Why should we take that profile at 1-1, even if he is a legit 70 hitter, over a guy like Druw Jones?

For me, I favor Druw and his overall profile and ceiling. I look at Johnson and doubt that his speed and athleticism will be a part of his game, based on his body type, into his mid 20’s. So, you have to believe his hit tool and power will carry below average defense at 2B during his arbitration years. Maybe I am wrong to project him in such a way, but that is my concern with him. 

As of today, I don’t have any interest in Johnson.  I do not think you spend the first pick on a second baseman, advanced hit tool or not. 
 

This pick, imo, should be a swing for the fences, HOF caliber talent pick.  Jones and maybe Green fit that description.  Jones seems to be less risky than Green as of today, so that’s the route I would go.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

As of today, I don’t have any interest in Johnson.  I do not think you spend the first pick on a second baseman, advanced hit tool or not. 
 

This pick, imo, should be a swing for the fences, HOF caliber talent pick.  Jones and maybe Green fit that description.  Jones seems to be less risky than Green as of today, so that’s the route I would go.

 

I'll take the best mix of ceiling and floor, which to me, eliminates Green.  His floor is too low.

While I'm not locked in on him I'm fine with Johnson, I'll gladly take a 2B with the bat to stick at first.  That's value. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll take the best mix of ceiling and floor, which to me, eliminates Green.  His floor is too low.

While I'm not locked in on him I'm fine with Johnson, I'll gladly take a 2B with the bat to stick at first.  That's value. 

 

I don’t think we know about Green’s floor, especially with the news of a swing change by McDaniel.  But I do agree that talking today, his floor is lower than the other 2.  
 

I just don’t think you can make any real determination on anything as of now though. 

I just hope Elias swings for the fences on this pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think we know about Green’s floor, especially with the news of a swing change by McDaniel.  But I do agree that talking today, his floor is lower than the other 2.  
 

I just don’t think you can make any real determination on anything as of now though. 

I just hope Elias swings for the fences on this pick.

Thank goodness we are talking about today.

I'm not interesting in burning a 1-1 for the chance to take the next Bubba Starling or Donavan Tate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

As of today, I don’t have any interest in Johnson.  I do not think you spend the first pick on a second baseman, advanced hit tool or not. 

I couldn’t disagree more with this logic.  Having a great-hitting 2B is really rare.  So long as he’s very solid at 2B, I’d have no hesitation in taking the best hitter in the draft just because he plays 2B.   Now, if he’s not a legit defender at 2B, that’s a different issue.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off-the-cuff guesses from a fantasy guy.   The rankings noted here are for the made-up games, not the real one.  Adjacent to Jammer's body type question, Willie Calhoun as a fire hydrant type breaking in now as a Termarr comp was one I hadn't seen yet, sifting these preps.

Termarr Johnson
Top 30-40
Locked-In: What we thought Willie Calhoun would be
Locked-Out: What Willie Calhoun is

Druw Jones
Top 30-40
Locked-In: Like father, like son
Locked-Out: The apple fell far from the tree

Elijah Green
Top 40-50
Locked-In: The best version of Jo Adell
Locked-Out: The worst version of Jo Adell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I couldn’t disagree more with this logic.  Having a great-hitting 2B is really rare.  So long as he’s very solid at 2B, I’d have no hesitation in taking the best hitter in the draft just because he plays 2B.   Now, if he’s not a legit defender at 2B, that’s a different issue.   

Second base is not a premium position.  When you have the first pick, you go SS, CF, 3rd, elite arm or, I guess C if they are special (although I wouldn’t go C).

Its not that he doesn’t have value but the value isn’t as strong as other positions that are quite frankly harder to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...