Jump to content

Kyle Stowers 2021


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Stowers' progress this year gives me a Mountcastlian AAA MVP kind of hope for his 2022.   I think with his contact issues more high minors reps will be in order than for say Cowser or Norby eventually.

I like the Bellinger comp stylistically, a bet on loud power tools a team thinks they can curate the hit tool enough to make it really play. 

He was a prep like Mayo/Willems though, with ~100 MLB HR by the time he was as old as Stowers is today.

Could definitely imagine a Stowers that makes it becoming a too many RBI non-tender somewhere in Arb if that is still the same when his time comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent article on Stowers here, with quotes from him, Buck Britton and hitting coach Ryan Fuller.   I thought this part was interesting concerning the entire team’s approach:

“In a game where there is not many things you can control, the pitches you swing at is something you can,” Stowers said during a recent interview at Prince George’s Stadium. “We get graded on not what the umpire is calling, but what we are swinging at based on what the strike zone actually is. Some umpires may have a little tighter zone or bigger zone, but it doesn’t change the objective measure we go by. From there, it is trying to produce hard contact and trust that the more times you put good balls in play, all the stats will go as you like to see them.”

Added Britton: “We are taking the approach (of) we’re going to focus on swinging at pitches over the middle of the plate. Everybody chases. But instead of having the thought of, ‘I’m not going to strikeout,’ if a guy has that mindset, now you might not get the aggressive swing that he takes and you might be losing exit velocity and what his strengths are offensively. So we really want to hone in on hammering pitches over the middle and not put him in a mindset of ‘Hey, let’s not strikeout.’ “

That also means most O’s hitters on the farm are not necessarily looking to shorten up on their swing with two strikes and just be happy to put the ball in play.

“We have been preaching this entire season that we are going to be on time and get our A swing off, no matter what,” said Britton. “That 0-2 pitch might be the best pitch you see in the at-bat. The 2-2 pitch might be better than the two strikes you had seen before. We want to make sure that, when we get a pitch over the middle of the plate, we’re on time and getting our A swing off. Especially with a guy that has his ability and if he shrinks that zone and starts swinging at pitches over the middle of the plate more frequently and not chase, I mean, look out.”

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2021/09/stowers-power-stanford-draftee-leads-os-farm-in-home-runs.html

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Excellent article on Stowers here, with quotes from him, Buck Britton and hitting coach Ryan Fuller.   I thought this part was interesting concerning the entire team’s approach:

In a game where there is not many things you can control, the pitches you swing at is something you can,” Stowers said during a recent interview at Prince George’s Stadium. “We get graded on not what the umpire is calling, but what we are swinging at based on what the strike zone actually is. Some umpires may have a little tighter zone or bigger zone, but it doesn’t change the objective measure we go by. From there, it is trying to produce hard contact and trust that the more times you put good balls in play, all the stats will go as you like to see them.”

Added Britton: “We are taking the approach (of) we’re going to focus on swinging at pitches over the middle of the plate. Everybody chases. But instead of having the thought of, ‘I’m not going to strikeout,’ if a guy has that mindset, now you might not get the aggressive swing that he takes and you might be losing exit velocity and what his strengths are offensively. So we really want to hone in on hammering pitches over the middle and not put him in a mindset of ‘Hey, let’s not strikeout.’ “

That also means most O’s hitters on the farm are not necessarily looking to shorten up on their swing with two strikes and just be happy to put the ball in play.

“We have been preaching this entire season that we are going to be on time and get our A swing off, no matter what,” said Britton. “That 0-2 pitch might be the best pitch you see in the at-bat. The 2-2 pitch might be better than the two strikes you had seen before. We want to make sure that, when we get a pitch over the middle of the plate, we’re on time and getting our A swing off. Especially with a guy that has his ability and if he shrinks that zone and starts swinging at pitches over the middle of the plate more frequently and not chase, I mean, look out.”

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2021/09/stowers-power-stanford-draftee-leads-os-farm-in-home-runs.html

 

This is very interesting.  The old school approach to hitting that I was taught and coached is completely out the window.  It's all exit velocity and power now.  It used to be "choke up on the bat, shorten the swing, and protect the plate" with two strikes.  This idea of having a smaller strike zone and timing a swing and swinging as hard as you can, regardless of count or situation is so different to me.  Yes, it leads to way more strikeouts, but it also leads to more extra base hits.  I imagine "hit and run" situations are nearly non-existent with this approach, too.  From the fan's standpoint, this makes for a more boring game.  Longer at bats, fewer balls put into play, more walks and strikeouts - I think it makes the game boring.  

Having said that, I'm excited to see what Stowers can do as he progresses through the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yossarian said:

This is very interesting.  The old school approach to hitting that I was taught and coached is completely out the window.  It's all exit velocity and power now.  It used to be "choke up on the bat, shorten the swing, and protect the plate" with two strikes.  This idea of having a smaller strike zone and timing a swing and swinging as hard as you can, regardless of count or situation is so different to me.  Yes, it leads to way more strikeouts, but it also leads to more extra base hits.  I imagine "hit and run" situations are nearly non-existent with this approach, too.  From the fan's standpoint, this makes for a more boring game.  Longer at bats, fewer balls put into play, more walks and strikeouts - I think it makes the game boring.  

I agree with you.   It may be the best strategy for success, but it’s not as fun to watch.   That said, when I follow our MiL games this year, I’m really impressed with how our hitters generate long at bats and wear pitchers down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baltfan said:

It concerns me that this strategy might not work so well with good pitching.   However, maybe training the eye this way could encourage better plate discipline which could then be used for a better two strike approach against better pitching. 

No strategy works against good pitching.  That's why they say "good pitching gets out good hitting".  If the pitcher makes his pitches and no mistakes, you're in trouble either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

No strategy works against good pitching.  That's why they say "good pitching gets out good hitting".  If the pitcher makes his pitches and no mistakes, you're in trouble either way.

While this is true, it seems that the two strike approach is back to some degreee in the majors.  You see more choking up and widening out. The concept of using your A swing with two strikes seems to be fading at the major league level. I hope our guys are being prepared to similarly adjust at the big league level since control is too good to just wait for.one down the middle or swing from the heels with two strikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure what to make of Stowers.  I feel definitive that we need to see more of him before buying into his game.

The strikeouts are alarming, even in this day and age. But he is also walking a lot and his BA isn’t that bad, although not high enough to believe that it will translate well into the majors.
 

He is doing great in Bowie but Bowie is very much a hitters park this year.  Aberdeen is very much of a pitchers park and he did well there but he was also 23 years old in A ball, which is always old for that league and I think it’s still old this year even if the league itself is older than normal.  
 

Next year, he will be 24 and playing in AAA.  That should give us the best gauge on where he is as a player.  Im not a believer in him and if someone wants to value him highly in a trade, he would be one of the first players I would move.  
 

That being said, if he is here next year, he will begin the season very high on the list of guys to watch early in the season.  If he can go to Harbor Park and continue to mash, hit for a decent average and walk a lot, I think he starts to become a real prospect.  Maybe he is there now but personally I’m skeptical.  
 

We also have to wonder, for any hitter, if they have the advantage this year because of how pitchers didn’t get to throw in 2020, at least in games.  Is that even a thing?  If it is, does that balance out next year?  I think this is something we may need to keep in mind for a lot of hitters, across MLB.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We also have to wonder, for any hitter, if they have the advantage this year because of how pitchers didn’t get to throw in 2020, at least in games.  Is that even a thing?  If it is, does that balance out next year?  I think this is something we may need to keep in mind for a lot of hitters, across MLB.

There’s something to this.   Here’s a comparison of the league OPS in the various leagues our farm teams play in, 2019 to 2021.    Note that the leagues themselves have realigned so it’s not a perfect comparison. 

Low A .677/.719

Hi A .682/.739

AA .677/.735

AAA .787/.746

With the exception of AAA, which had an outlier year in 2019 after switching to the major league ball, hitting at the other three levels is up substantially.   I’d theorize there are two causes: (1) pitchers were rusty after not pitching last year, and (2) pitchers’ innings have been limited, so you have to allocate more innings to pitchers further down the quality spectrum.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s something to this.   Here’s a comparison of the league OPS in the various leagues our farm teams play in, 2019 to 2021.    Note that the leagues themselves have realigned so it’s not a perfect comparison. 

Low A .677/.719

Hi A .682/.739

AA .677/.735

AAA .787/.746

With the exception of AAA, which had an outlier year in 2019 after switching to the major league ball, hitting at the other three levels is up substantially.   I’d theorize there are two causes: (1) pitchers were rusty after not pitching last year, and (2) pitchers’ innings have been limited, so you have to allocate more innings to pitchers further down the quality spectrum.   
 

Yea I think it’s a combo of a lot of things.  Either way, hitting being ahead of pitching this year isn’t surprising.  
 

The other side to that, of course, is that we have to give pitchers a break if they have an off year.  Just so many variables about 2021 that can skew things in a big way.  2022 tells us a lot more I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Because it's an attempt to curb one team's fanbase from stuffing the ballot.
    • 1 vs 2 vote is stupid after #1 already got the most votes.  Why not 2 cs 3 for reserve?
    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...