Jump to content

Elias says he has to consider drafting another catcher


Recommended Posts

Mike Elias  on the  latest edition of Inside the Yard said that catchers at most catch 120 games and the average is closer to 90 games a year.   Having two good offensive catcher would be a plus.  He also said that he can't draft by what his team needs now because things change by the time draftee develop in the minors.  He say it smart to draft the best player available.

Mike talks about preparing for the draft.   Says the trades deadline has to be on the back burner while preparing for the draft.  He says preparing for the draft is all consuming.  He covers a lot of ground in this interview and is vague where he needs to be.   He says being unpredictable going into the draft is a plus.

https://art19.com/shows/baltimore-orioles-inside-the-yard-podcast/episodes/13a32996-0fa8-4f87-acdd-1e7d3b681fc5

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he won't dismiss drafting a catcher.  Of course he says you draft the BPA.  Standard stuff.

Is he still running the draft instead of delegating it like other GMs?  Is it possible that his emphasis on the draft might cause him to miss opportunities on the trade front?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course he won't dismiss drafting a catcher.  Of course he says you draft the BPA.  Standard stuff.

Is he still running the draft instead of delegating it like other GMs?  Is it possible that his emphasis on the draft might cause him to miss opportunities on the trade front?

I'm not giving an opinion on what he said.  Just reporting what is in the interview.

I don't know when the interview occurred but Roch's interview sounds like it was old.  Recorded on June 25th from what they said about Lakins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I listened to it this afternoon. Very good interview, but nothing earth shattering or new. He talked about the added risk of taking a pitcher with a high pick. He also spoke of the dynamics of taking a high school player, and how scouts are able to judge their abilities compared to college players. He also talked about the virtues of judging intangibles. Elias stated he made mistakes early in his career in not spending time to get to know the player. 

He spoke of the cooperative relationship between player development and scouting departments. He spoke of the PD folks involvement in the draft and the scouts input into the development process. This is awesome. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2021 at 4:37 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Of course he won't dismiss drafting a catcher.  Of course he says you draft the BPA.  Standard stuff.

Is he still running the draft instead of delegating it like other GMs?  Is it possible that his emphasis on the draft might cause him to miss opportunities on the trade front?

I listened to this yesterday. He basically said the top of the draft is more from the Front Office and lower rounds are the scouts. Paraphrasing here. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the potential that Davis bat brings, and the possibility he could move fairly quickly through the system.

What's the chance he sticks at catcher long term though? I've seen he has improved this year, but have also read he could be a better fit as a corner OF or possibly even 3B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billw76 said:

I like the potential that Davis bat brings, and the possibility he could move fairly quickly through the system.

What's the chance he sticks at catcher long term though? I've seen he has improved this year, but have also read he could be a better fit as a corner OF or possibly even 3B. 

I'd be fine with him catching 42 games a year and playing 100 or so at a corner.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, billw76 said:

I like the potential that Davis bat brings, and the possibility he could move fairly quickly through the system.

What's the chance he sticks at catcher long term though? I've seen he has improved this year, but have also read he could be a better fit as a corner OF or possibly even 3B. 

Davis is rated as a 40 runner.   I  don't want to see him in the OF.    C/1B/DH.    Same positions Adley would play.   Mountcastle  1B/DH.      I like this lineup in 2023.  Give them all 600 At Bats.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Davis is rated as a 40 runner.   I  don't want to see him in the OF.    C/1B/DH.    Same positions Adley would play.   Mountcastle  1B/DH.      I like this lineup in 2023.  Give them all 600 At Bats.

I'm sure Davis will be busy proving himself in AA in 2023.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Davis is rated as a 40 runner.   I  don't want to see him in the OF.    C/1B/DH.    Same positions Adley would play.   Mountcastle  1B/DH.      I like this lineup in 2023.  Give them all 600 At Bats.

Not sure I'd like him in the OF either, not sure how he'd handle 3B if that was another move they'd consider making, the arm would definitely fit.

Those 3 could potentially be a pretty strong middle of the lineup though. Davis & Rutschman rotating at C, and also with Mountcastle at 1B/DH would be the perfect way to get them all 600 ABs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Every time we get a pitcher from the A’s this time of year, I think they are still doing us a solid for trading them Pat Neshek for cash in 2012.
    • I understand why you'd be concerned with Webb's performance but that contract is so juicy that I'd jump on him if he were available.  4/82 plus the remainder of his salary this year is a steal for him, even accounting for the fact that pitcher arb awards have been weirdly low.
    • Great to get a 2-0 win facing George Kirby, but man they made it way harder than it had to be. Grayson gets staked to a 1-0 lead in the top of the 4th, then walks 2 of the first 3 batters he faces in the bottom of the inning.  Fortunately, erased on a DP. The O’s score an insurance run in the 7th, but then can’t capitalize on a bases loaded, one out situation with Gunnar and Adley up.   In the bottom half, Grayson allows a single and puts the tying run on via a walk, then makes a poor throw on an easy DP comebacker that could have loaded the bases but Gunnar somehow got a barehand grip on the ball with his foot on the bag.   In the 8th, O’Hearn leads off with a double but the O’s failed to advance him. In the 9th, Kimbrel hits a guy, almost allows a game-tying homer that goes just foul, then hits another guy, and the baserunners both get into scoring position but Kimbrel is able to end it on a strikeout.    I’m thrilled they won, but man they made it gut-wrenching.   
    • 1: A lot of posters here actually have an milb.tv subscription and use it, or they attend games in person.  So you're off base if you think the prevailing opinion here is based on a few social media posts. 2: Henderson doesn't have a famous dad, and Holliday outproduced him at a younger age in the minors, and people here were about equally hyped about Henderson. 3: Holliday put up a 1.000+ OPS in AA as a 19 year old.  AA is harder than power-5 division 1 college baseball.  That's basically like a freshman putting up 25/10/5.  Not 4 points a game.  Get outta here with your terrible Bronny James comparisons.  If people here were actually blinded by a last name then posters here would have thought that Ryan Ripken was a legitimate prospect.  Believe it or not some of us actually do research on things like this.  We certainly aren't alone in rating Holliday highly, as he was rated #1 or #2 overall by every publication I can think of (and #1 by most of them if I recall.) 4: Holliday for Miller, who isn't guaranteed to be healthy enough to be in the starting rotation over the course of his controlled years, is a ludicrous trade proposal and I'm glad you're not our GM.  You're trading Holliday for an ace.  And not just any ace, an ace without injury concerns with years of control left.  Someone like Chris Sale, when the White Sox traded him for Moncada/Kopech+.  Anything less than an ace is a terrible return.  And I get that Moncada was probably a bad #1 overall prospect, but even if you think Holliday is a bad #1 overall too, you're still undervaluing him to an absurd degree by settling for a reliever with injury concerns, even a shutdown one.
    • So, Burnes is pushed back to Thursday. He could still make the Tuesday-Sunday starts next week, or does Hyde go with Kremer to make two starts next week. The Sunday game against the Yankees could be big. I think if we win two of three we clinch the season series.    
    • Probably a low leverage reliever.  Maybe one with options the O's can send to the minors.  No chance the O's can get a high K closer for him.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...