Jump to content

Per the Sun, O's looking at Izturis


LAOSfan

Recommended Posts

Would you trade Hayden Penn for Greene? Olson could very easily turn into Penn...

I know we are afraid of Olson becoming Maine, but the fact is he's not a hard thrower and has to rely on his control. And right now his control is off and he may never shake off the stage fright to get it better.

Had Greene had his 2007 #'s, there's no way you could get him for just Olson.

And when you have Liz, Bergesen, Hernandez, Berken and Penn as well as the Big Three behind him, you can afford to take that risk. Olson's upside is likely a #4-5 starter or swingman. Greene while he's 29 is a year removed from being one of the top SS's in baseball.

Would you have traded Jeremy Guthrie for Greene?

Because he could easily become Guthrie as well. We are not really in a position to be trading any pitchers right now considering the situation we are in now.

Especially not for Greene, who is not much of a long-term solution. Odds are he is here for a year and then gone. Then back to square one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I disagree, the #1 commodity in baseball right now is top ML ready position prospects especially middle infielders.

Young pitchers are a crapshoot.

You can disagree all you want but you are completely wrong.

And, btw, you keep talking about MI being the hardest to get...That is false.

True SS prospects are tough to get but there are a lot of second base types out there, either guys who play second or guys who need to move from SS.

So, your idea there is false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you have traded Jeremy Guthrie for Greene?

Because he could easily become Guthrie as well. We are not really in a position to be trading any pitchers right now considering the situation we are in now.

Especially not for Greene, who is not much of a long-term solution. Odds are he is here for a year and then gone. Then back to square one.

Olson is nowhere near Guthrie. He throws a fastball at 88-90 MPH. Guthrie throws 94-96. Both had location issues, but Guthrie can throw low and away. Olson likes to pitch inside and when you don't have a blazing fastball you'd better have darn good control when you do that.

At some point you've got to take a risk, and there's a possiblity we could lock up Greene for a couple of seasons for a very low price and get an .800+ OPS SS with great defense in return. If that costs us a future #4 starter I can live with that because we've probably got 3-4 #4 starters in the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, the #1 commodity in baseball right now is top ML ready position prospects especially middle infielders.

Young pitchers are a crapshoot.

Then why aren't the Padres able to get rid of Greene?

Why aren't teams beating down the Orioles door for Roberts?

Why do the Pads want to get RID of Greene?

By your logic the Padres are being run by a bunch of dyslexic Chimps.

Pitching is number one because it is such a crapshoot. Olson has minor league credentials and had a rough first run through the majors. And if I had a nickle for every reliable, to very good, major league starter that had a rough season or two at the beginning of their career I could buy the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe some "fans" actually thought Olson for Greene was a good deal. You're here talking about how horrible Izturis is at batting? Here are Greene's numbers in 2008:

.213BA .260OBP .339SLG 10HRs 35RBIs, I know he only played 105 games but still not very encouraging.

In 2007, he hit: 27HR .254 .291 .468, just look at his on base percentage. The only encouraging aspect I can see to this is his 27 homeruns through 153 games. The only good offensive year he had was wayy back in 2004. It's sure that he's not a good hitter, he might be a gold glove defender but is he worth a 24 year old former 1st rounder who pitched consistently and solidly in the minors? No, we should give Olson more show faith and he'll get the hang of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olson is nowhere near Guthrie. He throws a fastball at 88-90 MPH. Guthrie throws 94-96. Both had location issues, but Guthrie can throw low and away. Olson likes to pitch inside and when you don't have a blazing fastball you'd better have darn good control when you do that.

At some point you've got to take a risk, and there's a possiblity we could lock up Greene for a couple of seasons for a very low price and get an .800+ OPS SS with great defense in return. If that costs us a future #4 starter I can live with that because we've probably got 3-4 #4 starters in the organization.

Olson is/was a much better MiL pitcher than Guthrie was and he did it at a much younger age.

As for Greene and the risk...Why take that risk with a solid young pitcher though?

Why not just let him go somewhere and then sign him as a FA after next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can disagree all you want but you are completely wrong.

And, btw, you keep talking about MI being the hardest to get...That is false.

True SS prospects are tough to get but there are a lot of second base types out there, either guys who play second or guys who need to move from SS.

So, your idea there is false.

2B is just as barren in the minors as SS as far as top prospects go.

It's why guys like Roberts and Hardy would be in such demand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me in on being against Olson for Greene. If Greene had put up a .750 OPS, I'd certainly do this deal, but you really don't know what you're going to get from him.

Olson has the chance to be a back of the rotation starter, and that's far more valuable to this team right now.

I would like to have Greene, but I don't want to lose a solid young arm for a guy making that money. I thought this would be more of a salary dump on SD's part anyway. I wouldn't mind us taking on the salary for a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2B is just as barren in the minors as SS as far as top prospects go.

It's why guys like Roberts and Hardy would be in such demand.

You are just wrong....Second base, for whatever reason, is like the redheaded step child of the baseball team.

Second baseman don't get that high praise as far as top prospects go but there are many many more second baseman out there than SS...Most of the good SS prospects are really probably better suited for 2nd...Guys like DeJesus, Lillibridge, Donald, etc....they are all probably second baseman.

If we needed to get a second baseman instead of a SS, it wouldn't be difficult at all.

SS is the position that is hard.

But pitching always trumps everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see AM looking at so many avenues. I count 8 MLB SSs in the article with all being better than what we had last year.

Olson sounds like an initial asking price for Greene by the Pads. Hopefully, that prices goes down to a lesser pitching prospect of the Berken/Bergesen variety and then it might get interesting. Like Olson, Bergesen and DHernandez have CA roots and might also peak the Pads interest.

I have no issue with Izturis - in the absence of a quality long term opportunity, take a cheap, superior defensive SS with a mediocre bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly could live with Izturis more if we get Tex.

Really, I could live with a lot of poor decisions if we add Tex. :D

I don't even really think Izturis is a poor decision. Its not a great move, or even a good one, but its a way to improve SS easily. His defense will be at Castro's level while his offense won't be at the 560 OPS our SS were at last year. It won't be good offense, but bad is better than what we had last year.

I'd prefer trading for Greene (obviously not for Olson though), but there is a pretty decent chance (although less than 50/50) that Izturis will be better than Greene next year, and obviously he's cheaper and wouldn't cost us any talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...