Jump to content

Tim Dierkes: Orioles should trade John Means


waynebug

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

2022 - We’re the worst or one of the worst teams in MLB. 
 

2023 - We win 70 games. 
 

2024 - Wildcard

What about Wildcard?  Does he become the new GM?  Ohhh, you mean we get in the playoffs. :)  Yeah, I think that's a reasonable guess of the plan.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

2022 - We’re the worst or one of the worst teams in MLB. 
 

2023 - We win 70 games. 
 

2024 - Wildcard

By 2024 we should have a few players filling out our infield holes, so the lineup should be close to set. Still need to figure out 3-4 spots in the rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jabba72 said:

By 2024 we should have a few players filling out our infield holes, so the lineup should be close to set. Still need to figure out 3-4 spots in the rotation. 

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

Its going to be an interesting offseason for Elias thats for sure. The rotation needs some serious help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

 

Did you trade Hays, too?  Who did we get?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

So, they will be the first team ever with all home grown players? Nobody fails? That is a totally unrealistic plan. If ownership and the GM are unwilling to manuever the team through the AL east, then it may very well be time to sell and move the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

If we look legit in 2024 without acquiring anything for Mullins, Means, or Mancini..... why trade them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ruzious said:

What about Wildcard?  Does he become the new GM?  Ohhh, you mean we get in the playoffs. :)  Yeah, I think that's a reasonable guess of the plan.    

I’d gleefully love to have Wildcard as GM. They should do a collective of well versed fans to vote and bet teams would be better:), fantasy land stuff of course. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s why I’m trading Mullins, Means, and Mancini this offseason. Add to the 2024 team.

2024 is looking legit. 

C - AR

1B - Mountcastle

2B - Westburg

SS - Gunnar

3B - Mayo

LF - Stowers

RF - Greene(2022 #1 pick)

CF - Cowser

DH - Kjerstad 

Rotation: Grod, Hall

I don't think we will see Mullins or Means traded this off season.   Mancini needs to be traded or extended this off season.  

I am more in favor of trading player when the O's prospects are ready for the majors.   Next spring that looks like Adley and Neustrom will be ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBA and digesting new rules, etc first of course, but if you are 2024 MVP Adley Rutschman and 2024 Cy Young Award winner Grayson Rodriguez, do you want your team to have...

Arb3 John Means

Arb4 Anthony Santander   (low 2021 RBI's help the 2022-2024 salary forecast)

Arb2 Austin Hays and Cedric Mullins

...or trade returns perhaps not yet adjusted Winning MLB players that season?

With the window being set as 2022-2028 as the team control years for the franchise caliber guys, strip mining the above four guys for the pipeline flirts with making the first 3/7ths of those years tough on them if the Cowser/Kjerstad/Gunnar type guys don't come fast.

I think what I'm rooting for is only growing the good Supporting Cast inventory from here and Current Orioles/Future Orioles are kind of a First Half/Second Half roster glue for all seven of the Rutschman/Rodriguez teams.   I'd be a little bummed not to get to see the last few years Means/Mullins successes not get at least one opportunity with the real stuff, and to get a view of where on the Tillman/Wieters --> Strasburg/Harper spectrum Adley/Grayson lie for assessing what the 2023 Orioles can or ought to be.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

CBA and digesting new rules, etc first of course, but if you are 2024 MVP Adley Rutschman and 2024 Cy Young Award winner Grayson Rodriguez, do you want your team to have...

Arb3 John Means

Arb4 Anthony Santander   (low 2021 RBI's help the 2022-2024 salary forecast)

Arb2 Austin Hays and Cedric Mullins

...or trade returns perhaps not yet adjusted Winning MLB players that season?

With the window being set as 2022-2028 as the team control years for the franchise caliber guys, strip mining the above four guys for the pipeline flirts with making the first 3/7ths of those years tough on them if the Cowser/Kjerstad/Gunnar type guys don't come fast.

I think what I'm rooting for is only growing the good Supporting Cast inventory from here and Current Orioles/Future Orioles are kind of a First Half/Second Half roster glue for all seven of the Rutschman/Rodriguez teams.   I'd be a little bummed not to get to see the last few years Means/Mullins successes not get at least one opportunity with the real stuff, and to get a view of where on the Tillman/Wieters --> Strasburg/Harper spectrum Adley/Grayson lie for assessing what the 2023 Orioles can or ought to be.

 

Solid point, the O's should totally make personnel decisions based on the desires of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...