Jump to content

How Is Camden Yards Holding Up?


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

The club level definitely needs to be refreshed, it is pretty depressing.

The upper deck, lower deck and Eutaw Street area are quite nice.

Could use new tvs throughout and an updated sound system.

I agree with the club level.  Looks ok on the outside, but when I went to the restroom in one of the suites, it was very outdated, and actually embarrassing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It still looks good.  

I wonder if Orioles fans would be dumping on Nats park like they do, simply because it's the Nats and the whole "rivalry."

The open concourse at Nats stadium is fantastic.  It's great to be able to walk around and get food and still have access to watching the game.

A friend and I have bought cheap seats way upstairs and never gone to the upper deck.   Watched most of the game from the standup bars behind the lower deck seats down the 1B or 3B lines, and then at some point scouted out some seats that had been empty the whole game by one foul pole or the other and watched the last 3 or 4 from there.  

That is the one feature that Oriole Park lacks.   And it exists to some extent at New Comiskey, or whatever it is being called now by some corporation that is giving the White Sox money but since they are not giving me any money I refuse to devote brain cells to learning the name.   So it isn't a new invention, I think New Comiskey predated Oriole park by a year or two.   (Other than that feature though, I found very little to like about New Comiskey when I went there about 28 or 29 years ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

It still looks good.  

I wonder if Orioles fans would be dumping on Nats park like they do, simply because it's the Nats and the whole "rivalry."

The open concourse at Nats stadium is fantastic.  It's great to be able to walk around and get food and still have access to watching the game.

Nah, the Nats Park is cold and corporate and the upper deck is far too high. The open concourse is great though and they have some good food options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

It still looks good.  

I wonder if Orioles fans would be dumping on Nats park like they do, simply because it's the Nats and the whole "rivalry."

The open concourse at Nats stadium is fantastic.  It's great to be able to walk around and get food and still have access to watching the game.

Not really dumping on it - it just didn't have the feel of Camden Yards with the warehouse and the architecture.   And food at Camden was better IMO - and I had the expensive club level seats. But few parks do.  Whatever they call the SF Giants stadium now (Bank of America? too lazy to look it up) is pretty darn good, though of course is the view and the weather which is hard to beat. 

And I don't hate the Nats at all, and in fact rooted for them in their run in 2019. 

It is alot better than Oakland Coliseum, I can tell you that.   The only good thing I can say about the Coliseum is the A's do an admiral job with what they have to work with which is pretty much a dump of a stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GuidoSarducci said:

Not really dumping on it - it just didn't have the feel of Camden Yards with the warehouse and the architecture.   And food at Camden was better IMO - and I had the expensive club level seats. But few parks do.  Whatever they call the SF Giants stadium now (Bank of America? too lazy to look it up) is pretty darn good, though of course is the view and the weather which is hard to beat. 

And I don't hate the Nats at all, and in fact rooted for them in their run in 2019. 

It is alot better than Oakland Coliseum, I can tell you that.   The only good thing I can say about the Coliseum is the A's do an admiral job with what they have to work with which is pretty much a dump of a stadium.

The Oakland Coliseum used to have a nice view before Mt. Davis was built. 
 

ASxdZpef6acscqj2Crvg4IoloVyLHUBzWJTqmYqI

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

It still looks good.  

I wonder if Orioles fans would be dumping on Nats park like they do, simply because it's the Nats and the whole "rivalry."

The open concourse at Nats stadium is fantastic.  It's great to be able to walk around and get food and still have access to watching the game.

Open concourse is nice, but a bit overrated IMO.    Usually you can see a sliver of the field but don’t really have much of a view.    Better than no view at all, I suppose.   But I’ve been in a beer line plenty of times at Nats Park and couldn’t really tell what was going on even though I could see part of the field.   I once missed seeing Stephen Strasburg hit a homer off the Orioles while standing in a beer line facing the open concourse.

I think one of the trade offs of an open concourse is that the upper deck needs to be set back further.   But I’m not sure of that.   Ask your local architect.   

Frankly, I was glad that Nats Park wasn’t just a near-clone of Camden Yards, as many subsequent parks were.   I like Camden Yards better, but Nats Park has its charms, and it needed to be different than the park 40 miles down the road.  

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm 53 years old and still liked Memorial Stadium better.  Sometimes it isn't the amenities as much as the memories.  A winning tradition will do that though.  I like Oriole Park but they haven't won anything in it yet.  To answer the question though it has held up well which is more than I can say for the franchise.  Still love them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orioles have the SMALLEST video scoreboard in MLB... and this article and graphic is from 2016 (!!!!) and it was the smallest then, six seasons ago      https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/ct-baseball-video-boards-htmlstory.html

(so be sure to toggle to the "View boards in order of SIZE" button and ignore the 'installed by year button' info it provides, as alot of the boards added after the Orioles one from 2009 have been replaced since this 2016 article/graphic (i.e. the Angels now have a newer one that is massive). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baloriole4 said:

Orioles have the SMALLEST video scoreboard in MLB... and this article and graphic is from 2016 (!!!!) and it was the smallest then, six seasons ago      https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/ct-baseball-video-boards-htmlstory.html

(so be sure to toggle to the "View boards in order of SIZE" button and ignore the 'installed by year button' info it provides, as alot of the boards added after the Orioles one from 2009 have been replaced since this 2016 article/graphic (i.e. the Angels now have a newer one that is massive). 

Now I am probably going to found like an old fart, but just how big does a stadium video screen have to be to satisfy people?   I was looking at the Phillies’ screen last night while watching the game and thought it looked TOO big in the context of the stadium.   I feel like the OPACY screen provides the information I need or want, is easily visible and readable, and I don’t need or want a screen that dominates the stadium.   

Now, if they were designing the whole stadium from scratch, might a bigger screen have been fit in?   Maybe, but I think it would be hard to do now and not necessarily worthwhile.  

This from a guy who doesn’t have a TV screen larger than 50” in his house.  ?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GuidoSarducci said:

Not really dumping on it - it just didn't have the feel of Camden Yards with the warehouse and the architecture.   And food at Camden was better IMO - and I had the expensive club level seats. But few parks do.  Whatever they call the SF Giants stadium now (Bank of America? too lazy to look it up) is pretty darn good, though of course is the view and the weather which is hard to beat. 

And I don't hate the Nats at all, and in fact rooted for them in their run in 2019. 

It is alot better than Oakland Coliseum, I can tell you that.   The only good thing I can say about the Coliseum is the A's do an admiral job with what they have to work with which is pretty much a dump of a stadium.

No kidding they don't have a warehouse.  There's no other building like it on the east coast.  As @Frobbysaid I'm glad they didn't do a knock-off like every other stadium that came directly after Camden Yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Now I am probably going to found like an old fart, but just how big does a stadium video screen have to be to satisfy people?   I was looking at the Phillies’ screen last night while watching the game and thought it looked TOO big in the context of the stadium.   I feel like the OPACY screen provides the information I need or want, is easily visible and readable, and I don’t need or want a screen that dominates the stadium.   

Now, if they were designing the whole stadium from scratch, might a bigger screen have been fit in?   Maybe, but I think it would be hard to do now and not necessarily worthwhile.  

This from a guy who doesn’t have a TV screen larger than 50” in his house.  ?

 

Yea, I actually think the video board was sufficiently modernized without being too much / impeding on the physical charms of OPACY. Doesn't feel like a distraction to the eye from the grass on the field, warehouse, etc. but gets the job done (again, sufficiently updated from the old black / yellow bulb board).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

From a financial standpoint it would make very little sense to sell before Peter Angelos dies. If they sell before he dies, his investment in the Orioles would realize a capital gain and he would owe taxes on that capital gain. If the team is sold after he dies, the heirs would get a stepped up basis on the investment in the Orioles and would not owe taxes on capital gains upon selling the team.

The heirs will owe inheritance taxes, whether those inheritance taxes can be paid without selling the team is the big question. The amount of the inheritance tax depends on their estate planning strategy. Likely, Peter Angelos' interest in the team was moved into a trust which froze the value owed for inheritance tax purposes to the value of his interest at the time the team was moved into the trust.

I agree about your observations, except for the comments about an inheritance tax.  The estate would pay the tax based on the value of the assets, and there is no inheritance tax that I'm aware of.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Open concourse is nice, but a bit overrated IMO.    Usually you can see a sliver of the field but don’t really have much of a view.    Better than no view at all, I suppose.   But I’ve been in a beer line plenty of times at Nats Park and couldn’t really tell what was going on even though I could see part of the field.   I once missed seeing Stephen Strasburg hit a homer off the Orioles while standing in a beer line facing the open concourse.

I think one of the trade offs of an open concourse is that the upper deck needs to be set back further.   But I’m not sure of that.   Ask your local architect.   

Frankly, I was glad that Nats Park wasn’t just a near-clone of Camden Yards, as many subsequent parks were.   I like Camden Yards better, but Nats Park has its charms, and it needed to be different than the park 40 miles down the road.  

 

One thing that Nats Park has that Camden Yards needs is a live organist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...