Jump to content

Kevin Goldstein 10/4 chat on O’s topics


Frobby

Recommended Posts

For some reason, Kevin Goldstein got a lot of questions about the O’s today (forgive the formatting):

Cakes&Kakes: I know comps are lazy, but I’m going to ask anyways. Is Ryan Mountcastle the second coming of Mark Trumbo?
:01
Kevin Goldstein: I don’t hate this at all, which is about the strongest compliment I can give a comp.

 

Marc: If the Orioles make the highest bid on a SP, how likely is he to decline due to losing/strength of schedule/small park factors? Or do most FAs just care about the highest bid?

 
 
Kevin Goldstein: Yeah, it’s tough to go from 0 to 60 that quick. Big FAs want to win or think that they can. First step for BAL would be signing a good FA as opposed to an elite one.
 
Angelus Novus: How sold are you on Hays as maybe a second division regular? Any upside there?

 

Kevin Goldstein: Yes; not really.
 
Marc: Why’d the Britton trade fall through for Houston?
 
Kevin Goldstein: LONG STORY. Ugh. You just ruined my day, Marc!
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sat through this whole chat as well and tried to get about a thousand Orioles questions in there, to no avail. He also was asked if there were teams he hated dealing with and only said something like "Ugh THAT TEAM". For some reason I immediately connected it to the Britton comment and figured, yeah, dealing with Duquette-era Orioles probably sucked pretty bad. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may or may not have been the submitter of this question.    Would love Greinke as Sutcliffe guy no matter how slow he throws, but unlike Syndergaard, he has nothing to prove to the market where the perverse incentive of being a 2022 Oriole pitcher might operate in our favor.     Goldstein also volunteered NYY/TEX as Correa favorites.

11:33
Phil: Any guess among Correa, Verlander or Greinke who is best shot for Astros to retain for 2022?   Are the young Latin arms successful enough where for Click the SS is a somewhat clear priority?
11:33
Kevin Goldstein: I think they’re all gonzo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pickles said:

That seems to be a wildly negative take on Austin Hays imo.

He's a second division regular with no upside?

That's pretty absurd as he was better than that this year.

I agree with you. I think that was a lazy assessment. 

26 and somewhat healthy this season and he put up a 3.2bWAR. I don't know how much higher he can go, but that's a pretty decent full season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Pickles said:

That seems to be a wildly negative take on Austin Hays imo.

He's a second division regular with no upside?

That's pretty absurd as he was better than that this year.

When Hays was healthy the last half of the year, he put up well over an .800 OPS w/ gold glove defense.  What is a first division regular, Mike Trout?  Even Mike Trout wouldn't make the cutoff this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

When Hays was healthy the last half of the year, he put up well over an .800 OPS w/ gold glove defense.  What is a first division regular, Mike Trout?  Even Mike Trout wouldn't make the cutoff this year. 

The biggest concern is his splits this year.   He destroyed LH pitching and was not particularly good vs RH pitching.   And RH pitchers make up 70=% of the guys you will face (though the ALE has a lot of LH starters).

Now splits can vary widely from year to year, but it is a bit of a concern.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Pickles said:

That seems to be a wildly negative take on Austin Hays imo.

He's a second division regular with no upside?

That's pretty absurd as he was better than that this year.

I agree, but he has to continue to stay healthy. With continuity, there is some more there, I think. Hays became pull happy at times in the second half, and was off balance often. He pulled off many pitches on the outer half. In years past, he had more power to all fields. The swing did become shorter, and it seemed like he chased less. He still has more to prove, but 2022 should give us a more definitive answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2021 at 6:22 PM, Sports Guy said:

Hays should be dangled in trades this offseason for a cost controlled starter or IFer…use him as part of the deal.

Really like Hays and would be happy if he was an everyday OFer for us next year but I don’t trust him to stay healthy.

I think there is a case for Hays and/or Santander to be traded when Stowers and Neustrom are ready for the majors.  However neither are just yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

I think there is a case for Hays and/or Santander to be traded when Stowers and Neustrom are ready for the majors.  However either are just yet.  

So what?  If you can get a position of true need, you make the move.  I’m much more concerned about filling the rotation and/or the IF than I am the OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...