Jump to content

MLB Teams To Provide Housing for Minor Leaguers Starting in 2022.


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/32419545/major-league-baseball-require-teams-provide-housing-minor-league-players-starting-2022-sources-say?platform=amp

Quote

While MLB has yet to outline its plan formally, six team officials told ESPN they are starting to prepare to help house players across each of their four minor league affiliates. In mid-September, according to sources, owners from the league's 30 teams agreed unanimously to a plan that would provide housing for minor league players.

I think this is the smarter way to go about it.  Hopefully they will be some balance between providing actual housing and providing stipends, maybe depending on marital status and seniority.

Mostly I see this as a boon for the International player who I think is the real victim in this story despite the more media savvy Americans getting the press.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total no-brainer.

Hopefully this comes as actual housing owned by the teams in the minor league cities as opposed to a housing stipend provided to the players. Real estate is a fine investment for the team's investment portfolio and it is so difficult for the players to get anywhere near market rate trying to rent furnished apartments for less than 6 month terms (not to mention that they can be promoted, demoted or released at any time) that a housing stipend would be wildly inefficient. Teams know how many players will be at each level. Buy the real estate (or rent it for a full season's term) and allow the players to live there. When players change levels there will always be the correct amount of housing available. Don't make the players have to worry about it at all.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Total no-brainer.

Hopefully this comes as actual housing owned by the teams in the minor league cities as opposed to a housing stipend provided to the players. Real estate is a fine investment for the team's investment portfolio and it is so difficult for the players to get anywhere near market rate trying to rent furnished apartments for less than 6 month terms (not to mention that they can be promoted, demoted or released at any time) that a housing stipend would be wildly inefficient. Teams know how many players will be at each level. Buy the real estate (or rent it for a full season's term) and allow the players to live there. When players change levels there will always be the correct amount of housing available. Don't make the players have to worry about it at all.

Except that some players will be married and have children and they might have reasons for preferring a stipend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Except that some players will be married and have children and they might have reasons for preferring a stipend.

First off, decades overdue.  Why not do both?  The team can own or lease apartments for the players, but players can opt out and take a stipend to put towards a house if they have a family.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, yark14 said:

First off, decades overdue.  Why not do both?  The team can own or lease apartments for the players, but players can opt out and take a stipend to put towards a house if they have a family.  

Sure, I agree.

I honestly think a barracks situation might work for the young single folks.

I lived in the enlisted barracks for years and it ranged from not bad to pretty darn nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2021 at 9:59 AM, Jammer7 said:

It is long overdue. Something as simple as signing a lease for most people, is problematic for minor league players. It will be interesting to follow different teams’ solutions. 

I missed the details of this. I had thought it would be one solution across MLB. Is it instead up to each organization to come up with their own approach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wondering if in a city like Bowie you could have an arrangement between the ball club and Bowie State U. to take over 10-15 dorm rooms from April - October.   Of course there is some overlap between college terms and baseball seasons but it shouldn’t be that many dorm rooms unavailable to students.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/19/2021 at 8:24 PM, yark14 said:

First off, decades overdue.  Why not do both?  The team can own or lease apartments for the players, but players can opt out and take a stipend to put towards a house if they have a family.  

This sounds like the most logical and fair way, though that probably means they won't do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2021 at 9:11 PM, justD said:

I missed the details of this. I had thought it would be one solution across MLB. Is it instead up to each organization to come up with their own approach?

 

On 10/23/2021 at 9:13 PM, Can_of_corn said:

They haven't formally announced the plan(s).

My guess is they will let the teams handle it.

Would definitely make more sense to have broad parameters then allow teams to customize rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Just the differences between places like Norfolk and Delmarva, for example, could make the latter near impossible to manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've sometimes wondered (90% goofy mode) if the relative proximity of Delmarva/Aberdeen/Bowie might ever mean the Orioles having an A-/A+/AA academy near the Bay Bridge could be productive.

Any Shorebird or Ironbird would be an hour plus between the ballpark and complex most days, but that's pregame planning and postgame swing decision reviews.   Willy Yahn could have the same bed all summer.

I always picture Matt Blood as like the dorm RA in this setup, but you could also have the mental skills folks, chef making Randy Arozarena's chicken and rice, pitchers sharing grips and training tips, etc, etc.

Norfolk would need the bullet train though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...