Jump to content

Fangraphs’ Ben Clemens on the Orioles’ FA Needs


Frobby

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

 

Yes, the buck stops with ownership and nobody knows exactly how they work. I don't know that a dollar saved now equals a dollar more to spend in the future but I would assume it makes it easier. We have seen the opposite, where wasting money while the team is losing becomes a constraint.

When the Orioles payroll jumped in the mid 2010s, it was because of arbitration raises.  There were some FA contracts but nothing huge.  The Orioles didn’t spend more money in 2016 because they saved a lot of money in 2012. 

Now, if the team has a budget in mind and they don’t have money on the books in any given year, that allows them to spend more to reach that budget but that’s different than saying they are saving the money to spend later.  They aren’t doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

When the Orioles payroll jumped in the mid 2010s, it was because of arbitration raises.  There were some FA contracts but nothing huge.  The Orioles didn’t spend more money in 2016 because they saved a lot of money in 2012. 

Now, if the team has a budget in mind and they don’t have money on the books in any given year, that allows them to spend more to reach that budget but that’s different than saying they are saving the money to spend later.  They aren’t doing that.

Adam Jones, Cruz, Hardy, Trumbo, Markakis, Ubaldo,Davis. Those were a lot more dollars than arb raises and were all about spending once a competitive core was in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Adam Jones, Cruz, Hardy, Trumbo, Markakis, Ubaldo,Davis. Those were a lot more dollars than arb raises and were all about spending once a competitive core was in place.

Jones and Markakis were pre arbitration signings.  The others had modest contracts except Davis.

But none of them were signed because they had money in a safe ready to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rebuild should be transitioning into a 3 prong approach.   1. Transactional in acquiring major league players ala the Rays, 2. mid tier free agent acquisitions, and 3. prospect drafting/ promotions.  Steps 1 & 2 should focus on the next two seasons regardless of step 3.  The team can worry about redundancy once the team is competing.   The Tigers are a year ahead in the process but are making moves this off-season which the O’s should mirror.  It would be criminal to put another AAA team playing in Camden Yards in 2022.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my view, 2022 is the first year where I'm judging Elias for the on-field product. If this team loses 108 games again, it's his fault. There's no excuse for it anymore. We need upgrades to the infield and the starting rotation for sure, and then also for the bullpen. I don't think the outfield should be a concern. I'm not saying the team needs to compete right now for a playoff spot. But there needs to be progress towards that goal. 

If it were me and if we had the budget for it, which we probably don't, I would have gone aggressively after Correa. He's young, he fills a need for years to come, and he fills a serious hole in our organization. I get why that won't happen, but to me it would be similar to when the 119-loss Detroit Tigers signed Ivan Rodriguez back in 2004. At some point, you have to start getting serious about fielding a competitive team. If you want this team to compete in 2023 and 2024, it is unreasonable to expect them to go from 100 losses to playoff contention that fast. This is the year we need to step up. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crawjo said:

In my view, 2022 is the first year where I'm judging Elias for the on-field product. If this team loses 108 games again, it's his fault. There's no excuse for it anymore. We need upgrades to the infield and the starting rotation for sure, and then also for the bullpen. I don't think the outfield should be a concern. I'm not saying the team needs to compete right now for a playoff spot. But there needs to be progress towards that goal. 

If it were me and if we had the budget for it, which we probably don't, I would have gone aggressively after Correa. He's young, he fills a need for years to come, and he fills a serious hole in our organization. I get why that won't happen, but to me it would be similar to when the 119-loss Detroit Tigers signed Ivan Rodriguez back in 2004. At some point, you have to start getting serious about fielding a competitive team. If you want this team to compete in 2023 and 2024, it is unreasonable to expect them to go from 100 losses to playoff contention that fast. This is the year we need to step up. 

There is no reason not to run the payroll into the 70-80M range for the 2022 season and position this team for a run at being 500 and in position to contend in 2023.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, crawjo said:

In my view, 2022 is the first year where I'm judging Elias for the on-field product. If this team loses 108 games again, it's his fault. There's no excuse for it anymore. We need upgrades to the infield and the starting rotation for sure, and then also for the bullpen. I don't think the outfield should be a concern. I'm not saying the team needs to compete right now for a playoff spot. But there needs to be progress towards that goal. 

If it were me and if we had the budget for it, which we probably don't, I would have gone aggressively after Correa. He's young, he fills a need for years to come, and he fills a serious hole in our organization. I get why that won't happen, but to me it would be similar to when the 119-loss Detroit Tigers signed Ivan Rodriguez back in 2004. At some point, you have to start getting serious about fielding a competitive team. If you want this team to compete in 2023 and 2024, it is unreasonable to expect them to go from 100 losses to playoff contention that fast. This is the year we need to step up. 

Hey, we still might! 

;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, crawjo said:

In my view, 2022 is the first year where I'm judging Elias for the on-field product. If this team loses 108 games again, it's his fault. There's no excuse for it anymore. We need upgrades to the infield and the starting rotation for sure, and then also for the bullpen. I don't think the outfield should be a concern. I'm not saying the team needs to compete right now for a playoff spot. But there needs to be progress towards that goal. 

If it were me and if we had the budget for it, which we probably don't, I would have gone aggressively after Correa. He's young, he fills a need for years to come, and he fills a serious hole in our organization. I get why that won't happen, but to me it would be similar to when the 119-loss Detroit Tigers signed Ivan Rodriguez back in 2004. At some point, you have to start getting serious about fielding a competitive team. If you want this team to compete in 2023 and 2024, it is unreasonable to expect them to go from 100 losses to playoff contention that fast. This is the year we need to step up. 

2022 will be Elias' fourth season. He inherited the 1st overall pick in a draft with a slam dunk prospect and a farm system that was much better than advertised, including the current top pitching prospect in baseball. He's also had the benefit of an owner who has blessed three seasons of tanking baseball to tryout every possible diamond in the rough.

So I agree, we definitely should see improvement next year. I'm not worried about W-L total, so much as seeing better performance on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Porky said:

2022 will be Elias' fourth season. He inherited the 1st overall pick in a draft with a slam dunk prospect and a farm system that was much better than advertised, including the current top pitching prospect in baseball. He's also had the benefit of an owner who has blessed three seasons of tanking baseball to tryout every possible diamond in the rough.

So I agree, we definitely should see improvement next year. I'm not worried about W-L total, so much as seeing better performance on the field.

How was the inherited farm system better than advertised? Hays and Mountcastle are about what we thought they were. Mullins has exceeded expections. Other than that it's been pretty much all disappointment, especially Diaz and also including literally every single pitcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

How was the inherited farm system better than advertised? Hays and Mountcastle are about what we thought they were. Mullins has exceeded expections. Other than that it's been pretty much all disappointment, especially Diaz and also including literally every single pitcher. 

Grayson and Means.  Maybe Hall.

Of course you evidently think Grayson and Hall are disappointments???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Grayson and Means.  Maybe Hall.

Of course you evidently think Grayson and Hall are disappointments???

True, I forgot about Means. Grayson and Hall are not disappointments but it's also too early to say they are better than expected. I guess you could say that Grayson has climbed the prospect rankings, not sure about Hall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

True, I forgot about Means. Grayson and Hall are not disappointments but it's also too early to say they are better than expected. I guess you could say that Grayson has climbed the prospect rankings, not sure about Hall

He was the 21st pick in that draft.  I'd say he's doing better than expected.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why was only Judge mentioned if it's obvious? Don't make stupid omissions don't get obvious fact checked.
    • Wieters had a career fWAR of 15.5. Adley is at 14.3 in less than 3 seasons. Its Adley…by a mile.
    • Santander is a low OBP, poor BA, mediocre fielder with very little base running value player.   He has great power and can carry a team. He’s a really good dude, solid in the clubhouse and a great representative for your franchise. In many ways, he is exactly like Trumbo even if he is the better player.  And even if he doesn’t fall off as dramatically as Trumbo did, he’s still very likely to fall off.    For what he will cost, you can bring in some solid pitching. Next years offense, barring any trades, should look something like this: 1st-Mayo, 2nd- Holliday, SS- Gunnar, 3rd- Westburg C- Adley OF- Kjerstad and Cowser Basallo potentially ready by midseason or so. That leaves you with decisions on Mountcastle, Mullins and OHearn and I guess Santander. You need to get right handed. Mounty is a righty but unless you are moving Mayo to the OF, you need him to play first. Do you keep Mounty around to be a 1st/DH if Mayo is also going to play the OF?  Maybe. Some RH bats to consider: Tyler O’Neill. Having a really nice year.  Strong arm in the OF but struggles out there otherwise. Not a great fit for OPACY LF. JD Martinez: Still can hit but zero versatility. In a game that values that, do you want to sign someone who doesn’t give you any?  On the Os, it may be ok but I tend to doubt they would. Duvall: Good defensive player. Abysmal with the bat this year but was very good last year. buy low guy who could provide some bench value. Robert: Been awful this year and had injury issues in the past. WS have already said they will trim payroll after this year. There are very few ways for them to do that, especially since Benintendi has no value. Robert will be made available. Great spend, very good in the OF and still a tremendous offensive upside. He will cost a lot less to acquire than last offseason.  The Os reportedly were interested in him before. Teams like the Dodgers and Mariners were linked to him at the deadline. There will be competition for him and maybe the Os don’t have the same depth to trade out of that they did in the past, so it may be tough but they should look into it.
    • Captain obvious enters the room
    • Gunnar got his 20th SB the other day.  I was curious and looked at his sprint speed vs Ohtani.  His is 28.8 vs 28.1 for Ohtani.  It made me appreciate even more Ohtani’s 50SBs. 
    • Please do.   Zero people have said don’t spend money. You are lying. 
    • I see we now have 23 people that have lost their mind. 😂 well, I don’t think they’ll be a 24th.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...