Jump to content

I'm already over this offseason.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

What GM are you referring to?  Andy?

I think you understood my jest.  My point is that you can’t just copycat another team.  You got to look at what others have done well and learn from it.  Then adapt it to your situation.  Hopefully, Elias is smart enough to look at what successful teams have done and adapt it here.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I think you understood my jest.  My point is that you can’t just copycat another team.  You got to look at what others have done well and learn from it.  Then adapt it to your situation.  Hopefully, Elias is smart enough to look at what successful teams have done and adapt it here.

Ahh, gotcha.  I thought you were trying to say that the Orioles had done just that when they hired Elias.

Yea, trying to copy what the Astros did or what the Rays do isn't going to work.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camden_yardbird said:

The Rays are one of the least healthy organizations in MLB.  They frequently have the lowest fan turnout, they are usually rumored to be moving.  They have very low cable revenues.

Competitively they are run very well.  And the Franco extension certainly looks great now.

There's a huge difference between fan interest and a franchise being well run. Some of the Rays issues with attendance would be solved with a new ballpark. My friend has been to many ballparks and by far the Tropicana Field is the worst one he's visited. 

Tampa has never shown any signs of being a good baseball market, but that's on MLB choosing to expand there. If the Orioles want to compete they should be looking at organizations like the Rays for inspiration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There's a huge difference between fan interest and a franchise being well run. Some of the Rays issues with attendance would be solved with a new ballpark. My friend has been to many ballparks and by far the Tropicana Field is the worst one he's visited. 

Tampa has never shown any signs of being a good baseball market, but that's on MLB choosing to expand there. If the Orioles want to compete they should be looking at organizations like the Rays for inspiration. 

Playing half their games in Nashville?  ?

 

On a serious note, how did a new stadium work out for Miami?  Other than saddling taxpayers with a huge bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Playing half their games in Nashville?  ?

 

On a serious note, how did a new stadium work out for Miami?  Other than saddling taxpayers with a huge bill.

I'm not saying a new stadium fixes everything for the Rays, but they play in an absolute dump. I just don't see baseball ever being big in Florida. Even if the Orioles become consistent winners the attendance of the 90's isn't coming back with the entertainment options today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Have you ever written out a really long post, only to trash the whole thing because you realize you said virtually nothing that adds to the discussion? 

ps - you're welcome

I find it hard to believe that you would have written a long post that adds nothing to the discussion.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

The Rays are one of the least healthy organizations in MLB.  They frequently have the lowest fan turnout, they are usually rumored to be moving.  They have very low cable revenues.

Competitively they are run very well.  And the Franco extension certainly looks great now.

Franco's contract looks like they plan to trade him after the 2025 season.

From MLBTR:

In terms of financial breakdown, Franco will receive a $5MM bonus right off the bat. The shortstop will earn $1MM in 2022, $2MM in both 2023 and 2024, $8MM in 2025, $15MM in 2016, $22MM in 2027, and then $25MM in each of the 2028-32 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Franco's contract looks like they plan to trade him after the 2025 season.

From MLBTR:

In terms of financial breakdown, Franco will receive a $5MM bonus right off the bat. The shortstop will earn $1MM in 2022, $2MM in both 2023 and 2024, $8MM in 2025, $15MM in 2016, $22MM in 2027, and then $25MM in each of the 2028-32 seasons.

giphy.gif?cid=549b592d9868cqcbcta9yq8iob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Franco's contract looks like they plan to trade him after the 2025 season.

From MLBTR:

In terms of financial breakdown, Franco will receive a $5MM bonus right off the bat. The shortstop will earn $1MM in 2022, $2MM in both 2023 and 2024, $8MM in 2025, $15MM in 2016, $22MM in 2027, and then $25MM in each of the 2028-32 seasons.

It’s possible they’re looking at him this way. If he’s putting up enough WAR to justify that salary, they’ll find a suitor who will take most of that on and they can re-stock their system with some good talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Franco's contract looks like they plan to trade him after the 2025 season.

From MLBTR:

In terms of financial breakdown, Franco will receive a $5MM bonus right off the bat. The shortstop will earn $1MM in 2022, $2MM in both 2023 and 2024, $8MM in 2025, $15MM in 2016, $22MM in 2027, and then $25MM in each of the 2028-32 seasons.

It more or less follows the same progression as if he was going year by year under the current systems.   3 pre-Arb years (he’s probably not a Super-2), 3 Arb years and 5 FA years.   Sure they could trade him at any time but I don’t see an obvious attempt to structure the contract around a planned trade.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It’s possible they’re looking at him this way. If he’s putting up enough WAR to justify that salary, they’ll find a suitor who will take most of that on and they can re-stock their system with some good talent. 

They have the flexibility to do any number of things.  My guess is unless the team really struggles they keep him until just before he hits 10 years of service time (or whatever the new version of that is).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...