Jump to content

Who are our most underrated prospects, nationally?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not necessarily, especially given his age. Some people are just learning what it means to be an adult. I know I did.

I have a 19-year old daughter at home (actually, away in college). Sometimes she cops an attitude when my wife and I try to give her advice, or ask her to do things. Sometimes she says things is a tone that is hurtful. She does less of it now han she did when she was 17, and I expect I'll see even less of it when she's 21. It's all part of growing up, and not everyone matures at the same exact pace.

Maybe Rowell will always be an egotistical, self-centered jerk who won't listen to anyone and thinks he's God's gift. Plenty of adults are that way. But I'm not going to assume that he won't grow out of it, because in my experience most kids do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of our most underrated prospects nationally is also underrated on OH. I really believe Brad Bergesen is going to be something special for the O's.

For a franchise that's struggled with people who can't avoid walks and can't go deep into games, Bergesen's control will make him invaluable to the O's.

His numbers compare favorably to Roy Halladay's minor league numbers. I'm very hopeful he can be as successful at Norfolk this season as he was at Bowie last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And hurt his development as a baseball player.

Agreed. I don't really think sending him down would do anything for him. If anything, I think that if next season the rosters turn out the way people think they will (with Rowell and Henson at Frederick and Kolodny at Delmarva, and then putting this new guy from the Hernandez trade wherever he needs to be), Rowell will have plenty of incentive to get his head in the game and out of...well, wherever it's been. He'll see that there are plenty of capable guys at his position in the system and that he's got work to do if he wants to stay on track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. I don't really think sending him down would do anything for him. If anything, I think that if next season the rosters turn out the way people think they will (with Rowell and Henson at Frederick and Kolodny at Delmarva, and then putting this new guy from the Hernandez trade wherever he needs to be), Rowell will have plenty of incentive to get his head in the game and out of...well, wherever it's been. He'll see that there are plenty of capable guys at his position in the system and that he's got work to do if he wants to stay on track.

Not so sure about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the new guy might be our nationally most underrated prospect - Justin Turner. He's regarded as a good defensive 2nd baseman - great instincts, ok range; very good minor league numbers for a 2nd baseman - lifetime .310 batting average and .822 OPS through age 23 in AA, and he started for an NCAA Championship team. Yet, I haven't seen his name prominently on any prospects list. It'd be better if he was a year younger, but he's not too old, and it wouldn't be shocking to see him in the majors this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the new guy might be our nationally most underrated prospect - Justin Turner. He's regarded as a good defensive 2nd baseman - great instincts, ok range; very good minor league numbers for a 2nd baseman - lifetime .310 batting average and .822 OPS through age 23 in AA, and he started for an NCAA Championship team. Yet, I haven't seen his name prominently on any prospects list. It'd be better if he was a year younger, but he's not too old, and it wouldn't be shocking to see him in the majors this season.

Baseball America has him as #29 on their top 30 for the Reds in 2008. The write-up is the same as we have seen since the trade. He and Miclat appear to be cut from the same cloth, except that Miclat - pre-surgery - had a plus arm, while Turner's arm is considered he weakness. Both appear to be the type of player that fit the brand of baseball that Trembley prefers. I expect that he will be the 2B at Norfolk and is insurance in case we are unable to extend BRob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball America has him as #29 on their top 30 for the Reds in 2008. The write-up is the same as we have seen since the trade. He and Miclat appear to be cut from the same cloth, except that Miclat - pre-surgery - had a plus arm, while Turner's arm is considered he weakness. Both appear to be the type of player that fit the brand of baseball that Trembley prefers. I expect that he will be the 2B at Norfolk and is insurance in case we are unable to extend BRob.

Except that Miclat has shown absolutely no power in his bat - so far. Until we see that change, I wouldn't call him more than a good 5th round pick. Hopefully, it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that Miclat has shown absolutely no power in his bat - so far. Until we see that change, I wouldn't call him more than a good 5th round pick. Hopefully, it will.

It depends on whether you value defensive versatility and strikezone command/contact skills more than power. I think Miclat is a better prospect, but Turner is certainly a surer bet to contribute "something" at the ML-level, even if it's below-AVG productionat 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on whether you value defensive versatility and strikezone command/contact skills more than power. I think Miclat is a better prospect, but Turner is certainly a surer bet to contribute "something" at the ML-level, even if it's below-AVG productionat 2B.

I'm not convinced that Turner isn't going to become a solid major league hitter. He's produced at every level thus far and been very consistent and he's still young and learning.

His minor league numbers are arguably, significantly superior to Brian Robert's numbers at similar ages and levels. We know BRob wasn't exactly considered a sure fire prospect when he came up, so I think Turner can overcome the same lack of confidence in his abilities that BRob overcame.

I'd sure love to have him start at Norfolk and just tear up AAA. It would be great to have a middle infielder actually pushing the O's for a callup, wouldn't it? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zach Britton. Young lefty who throws 88-90, but should, as he continues to progress throw in the lower 90's much more. Has a plus 2-seamer, above average change, and slider is a work in progress. He once had a curve, but that was ditched, but if he really gets a handle on his 3 pitches, that might be something to bring back. He also has a great work ethic.

His K-rate will soon rise as he fully gets a hold of his slider, which has progressed a lot from Aberdeen in 2007 to Delmarva in 2008. Britton is a guy who has a ceiling, according to some, as a front-line starter, yet he struggles to get much mention because of how loaded the top 5 prospects are in our system. Some even leave him out of the top 10 prospects in the organization.

With all the pitchers leaving Bowie, and not too many proving they deserve a promotion in Frederick this past season, if Britton continues to improve, he may be brought up to Bowie by mid-season as there will be room in that rotation. Right now I see something like Zach Clark (if he doesn't go up to Norfolk), Jake Arrieta and Brandon Erbe with guaranteed spots there, and Chorye Spoone will not be back until mid-season.

Watch for Britton, now that he's a lot closer, geographically, to Baltimore, his name should get some more buzz on the forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bergesen is underated. He had a great year at AA and everyone is rating him low. National media ignores him. Tony, rates him as the O's 18th.

Bergesen went 15-6 with a 3.22 ERA at 22 year old at AA. For that excellent effort he moved from 18th on Tony's 2007 list to 18th on Tony's 2008 list. I think you will have to agree that is quite a jump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bergesen is underated. He had a great year at AA and everyone is rating him low. National media ignores him. Tony, rates him as the O's 18th.

Bergesen went 15-6 with a 3.22 ERA at 22 year old at AA. For that excellent effort he moved from 18th on Tony's 2007 list to 18th on Tony's 2008 list. I think you will have to agree that is quite a jump.

Is that snarkiness I detect, WC? I don't know that I've seen that from you before! ;)

Bergesen is certainly an interesting one to watch. There have been a lot of good posts about how his peripherals will make it difficult to succeed as he climbs up the ladder, and I think Tony defended his choice at 18 quite well. But ultimately it's about results. Let's hope Bergesen can continue to overperform.

I'd personally probably go with Snyder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
    • The fact that they put this on the 1991 Donruss, perhaps the ultimate peak of the junk wax era, makes this even funnier to me.  If toilet paper ever shot up in price I wouldn't care because I've got heaps of '91 Donruss floating around. This is very true, which makes me thinks he'll get claimed somewhere else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...