Jump to content

MASN refuses to pay for travel costs


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

This an extremely bad decision.  If half the teams were doing it then maybe but being the only one is just stupid.  You are trying to get fans to buy into a rebuild.  You are asking people to pay for tickets when you are telling people you really aren't going to compete yet but saying it is for the greater good.  We all have to pay our cable fees whether they win or lose.  We can all argue whether not paying for better players makes sense or not at this stage, but this is penny pinching.  Period.  Safety?  BS.  There is only so much of this fans are going to take.  After a while the KY jelly supply runs out.  At 62 I try not to overreact to things but this pisses me off. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why I have doubts about the Correa offer. Not because MLBtR or Heyman or anyone else didn’t pick it up. 
 

Look, this team continues to tell the fans they don’t care about them.  They don’t care about the on field product.  They don’t care about the production value of the product they are putting out there.  They don’t care if it’s communicated to you in a way the fan deserves.  
 

None of it.  They care about saving money.  It’s funny that people think this team is just going to flip a switch and are saving money in some special bank account to spend later.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And this is why I have doubts about the Correa offer. Not because MLBtR or Heyman or anyone else didn’t pick it up. 
 

Look, this team continues to tell the fans they don’t care about them.  They don’t care about the on field product.  They don’t care about the production value of the product they are putting out there.  They don’t care if it’s communicated to you in a way the fan deserves.  
 

None of it.  They care about saving money.  It’s funny that people think this team is just going to flip a switch and are saving money in some special bank account to spend later.

There’s nothing inconsistent with thinking they are being cheap now and thinking that money not spent now increases the ability to  spend money later.  I’d say your position is the inconsistent one, thinking that if the O’s spent more money on free agents today that wouldn’t impair their ability to do so in the future.   

Sometimes I wonder if MASN’s cheapness should be equated with the Orioles’ cheapness.   I’m having trouble squaring this penny-pinching on sending reporters to Florida and announcers to road games with spending $7 mm on Jordan Lyles.   The Lyles move stands out like a sore thumb as contrary to everything else the O’s and MASN have done this offseason.   Not that $7 mm is a lot to spend on a pitcher, but it’s a lot to spend on a pitcher of Lyle’s caliber.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

This bothers me more symbolically than it does substantively.   

But substantively it affects the quality of broadcasts. Announcers get a lot more feel for the game when they can look over the entire field. They can judge fly balls better, they can see things that are happening that the TV broadcast may not be picking up. 

It's utterly and disgustingly embarrassing that MASN is run so cheaply. It truly makes you wonder if the Orioles will ever spend adequately for major league talent when they are so cheap that they wont even send their broadcasters to away games. 

Until an ownership group that does things in a 1st class way ever takes over the Orioles, we will most likely be always be treated to the Angelos treatment of 3rd class, cut corner ways so their bottom line is at it's best.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

But substantively it affects the quality of broadcasts. Announcers get a lot more feel for the game when they can look over the entire field. They can judge fly balls better, they can see things that are happening that the TV broadcast may not be picking up. 

It's utterly and disgustingly embarrassing that MASN is run so cheaply. It truly makes you wonder if the Orioles will ever spend adequately for major league talent when they are so cheap that they wont even send their broadcasters to away games. 

Until an ownership group that does things in a 1st class way ever takes over the Orioles, we will most likely be always be treated to the Angelos treatment of 3rd class, cut corner ways so their bottom line is at it's best.

I'm surprised that the Nats aren't just very publicly paying for their crew.  I would think that for the cost it would be worthwhile for them to make the O's look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

None of it.  They care about saving money.  It’s funny that people think this team is just going to flip a switch and are saving money in some special bank account to spend later.

I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to Elias since he said the money would be there when it's time to spend. Saying that, we all know what he's up against and moves like this continue to show how little the Angelos family cares about the fans.

We are the peasents and we are supposed to enjoy the occasional bread they throw into the crowd for a cheer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm surprised that the Nats aren't just very publicly paying for their crew.  I would think that for the cost it would be worthwhile for them to make the O's look bad.

If I were them I certainly would. I'd be sticking it to the Angelos family every chance I got. Of course they probably can't since MASN owns the broadcast rights, not the Nationals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is logic to the orioles not spending on the major league roster 

The lack of travel for broadcasters though is just cheap, and shows how little they care about the fans. In the grand scheme of things, it’s not even a large cost 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, seak05 said:

There is logic to the orioles not spending on the major league roster 

The lack of travel for broadcasters though is just cheap, and shows how little they care about the fans. In the grand scheme of things, it’s not even a large cost 

These are the same guys that let coaches go to cut costs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...