Jump to content

Kyle Bradish 2022


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

To some extent I feel like the use of Kyle Bradish's 6.8 years will be the story of if MLB and the MLBPA do anything about pitcher carousels in that time.   

If the Arm Barns stay so big you can liberally enjoy every Driveline Student of the Month throwing their arms out 13 out of 26 weeks, using Kyle Bradish pitches 60-90 any given night may not be that big of a value proposition.

How quickly does baseball want to drum Trey Mancini's early 30's reflexes out of the league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, interloper said:

Big start for Kyle tonight against a hot Red Sox squad, and coming off a not-great start. I want to see him put together a QS. 

Good call.    Kind of a more upside than downside kind of night...something like 5 IP, 4 R maybe even a qualified success, as we wait for the white smoke and try to get through a clump with neither Watkins nor Rodriguez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Good call.    Kind of a more upside than downside kind of night...something like 5 IP, 4 R maybe even a qualified success, as we wait for the white smoke and try to get through a clump with neither Watkins nor Rodriguez.

5 IP 4 R will feel a LOT better if the offense gets him some runs and keeps it competitive. Honestly, I'm looking at the offense (specifically our vaunted 1 through 6) just as much as I am Bradish because they really should be better than they've shown recently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/5/2022 at 3:09 PM, Moose Milligan said:

 

Took me awhile to find it:  https://video.masnlivestream.com/video/Kyle Bradish on his rough fourth inning against Twins/2170

 

It's not that bad, IMO.  Not all of these guys are going to be brilliant and engaging in front of the media.  Not all of these guys are going to like answering questions, especially after a bit of struggling.  Maybe there's a little bit of Bedard here, and that's fine.

Which brings me to the best ever Bedard/media exchange:

Bedard:  "I'm only allowing three questions."

Reporter:  "Why only three questions?"

Bedard:  "That's one."

I died.  That was hilarious.

 

Revisiting from op 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradish just needs more consistency.  No doubt he has the stuff to be a successful starter.  He threw some good changeups.  At times he has a wipeout slider but he needs to be more consistent with it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Bradish just needs more consistency.  No doubt he has the stuff to be a successful starter.  He threw some good changeups.  At times he has a wipeout slider but he needs to be more consistent with it.  

I agree.  Also, it's not like the O's have a group of competent starters in the minors ready to succeed in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say I really like Bradish’s stuff.  If he can sharpen his command just a little, I think he can be an effective starting pitcher.   He’s pretty strong, threw 105 pitches tonight in 4.2 and still had good zip on the ball.  I can’t blame Hyde for removing him after the 2-out walk in the 5th but I was disappointing that he didn’t get the W for the second start in a row.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I must say I really like Bradish’s stuff.  If he can sharpen his command just a little, I think he can be an effective starting pitcher.   He’s pretty strong, threw 105 pitches tonight in 4.2 and still had good zip on the ball.  I can’t blame Hyde for removing him after the 2-out walk in the 5th but I was disappointing that he didn’t get the W for the second start in a row.  

Should be a good learning opportunity there, gotta earn the chance to keep going, especially for a Rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2022 at 10:35 PM, Frobby said:

I must say I really like Bradish’s stuff.  If he can sharpen his command just a little, I think he can be an effective starting pitcher.   He’s pretty strong, threw 105 pitches tonight in 4.2 and still had good zip on the ball.  I can’t blame Hyde for removing him after the 2-out walk in the 5th but I was disappointing that he didn’t get the W for the second start in a row.  

I guess they keep trotting him out there. He could go to AAA to work on things, but he looked really good there, and it’s not like we have too many options. 

We could re-arrange the game a bit and have an opener go the first inning of his starts. I think that would benefit Hall too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I guess they keep trotting him out there. He could go to AAA to work on things, but he looked really good there, and it’s not like we have too many options. 

We could re-arrange the game a bit and have an opener go the first inning of his starts. I think that would benefit Hall too. 

Very little reason to go to AAA.  He just probably isn’t a starter, which has been the book on him.

You certainly keep sending him out there in the meantime but that has always been his most likely outcome.  At his age and with his experience, it’s time to sink or swim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...