Jump to content

Mancini ejection?


SteveA

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

Can someone explain to me the play that led up to it?   I'm at work and can't watch/listen.   The play by play descriptions available online don't seem to help me at all to understand what happened.

Trey ran through the base as the off line throw went past the first baseman. He turned in field but made no visble attempt at all to advance.  He walked slowly back to first and was tagged and called out.  Then was barking from dugout I guess the top of the inning and was tossed 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the umpire and Trey are both at fault here.  I saw him turn toward the infield and thought that was not a smart thing to do.  Then walked back toward  1st unconcerned.  And was tagged out.    Very questionable call by the ump because Trey made no move toward 2nd.   Almost like the ump called him out because he could.  Hate it when umpires makes it about themselves.

Hyde got thrown out also.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think the umpire and Trey are both at fault here.  I saw him turn toward the infield and thought that was not a smart thing to do.  Then walked back toward  1st unconcerned.  And was tagged out.    Very questionable call by the ump because Trey made no move toward 2nd.   Almost like the ump called him out because he could.  Hate it when umpires makes it about themselves.

Hyde got thrown out also.

No doubt Mancini shares in the blame.  Good call bad call it's on him to be a professional and not get thrown out over the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

What an insanely bad call. You should be able to challenge that nonsense. 

It's not a call you see often at all but technically it's the correct call.  At the 10 second make Mancini does take a single step toward second while checking to see if the throw got away.

It's not something you should get yourself ejected over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mancini made a few mistakes there. Turning towards 2nd and he did give it and the ball a glance. Seemed like he was gauging whether to go or not.  Then strolling back to the bag after deciding not to. He should definitely be thinking worse case scenario there. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mancini ran past bag, turned head to right, seen ball and catcher, pulled up in sort of two footed hop "stop" then turned left and walked back to bag. You watch Ump, he immediately looks to make out call on tag, he was looking to make that call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He made no step or turn to advance.  BS call by umpire .. 

And the archaic ability of field umpires to eject players needs to go.  Mic the umps and the transmission and call can be reviewed off site and if a disciplinary action is needed they can make that determination.   But the testosterone fueled, my way or the highway, arbitrary ejection of players is just something from the past that needs to go.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

He made no step or turn to advance.  BS call by umpire .. 

And the archaic ability of field umpires to eject players needs to go.  Mic the umps and the transmission and call can be reviewed off site and if a disciplinary action is needed they can make that determination.   But the testosterone fueled, my way or the highway, arbitrary ejection of players is just something from the past that needs to go.  

It's the Umps job to run the game, if a player is stopping that from happening they should have the power to remove them.

Of course they should not abuse that power.

The way some players act toward umps would never be allowed in the general workforce.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...