Jump to content

Orioles Claim Logan Allen


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

Here is my guess: () is 26 and 40 man roster size

Currently (26 and 39)

Elias options Lakins. (25 and 39)

Adds Allen to the 26 and 40 man rosters. (26 and 40)

Moves either A Wells or Ellis to the 60 man IL. (26 and 39)

Then he either 1) keeps Allen for a few days so Holt has watch him  (26 and 39) or

 2) DFAs Allen trying to get him through waiver to AAA. ( 25 and 38)

If  they do 2) then they promote Vespi to take Allen's spot on the 26 and 40 man rosters. ( 26 and 39) or

Call up Diplan (26 and 38)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think Vespi will get promoted to the majors when they feel he’s ready.  To this point, he’s off to a good start in 10.2 innings in AAA, after struggling a lot in AAA last year.   I think he’ll see the majors at some point this season if he continues pitching well.   Meanwhile, Allen isn’t going on the 25-man roster so he’s got nothing to do with Vespi being promoted.  

I see. I was under the impression that he had no options and would be in Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

I see. I was under the impression that he had no options and would be in Baltimore. 

I now think you’re right.   I hadn’t paid attention to the fact that he’s out of options.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

Here is my guess: () is 26 and 40 man roster size

Currently (26 and 39)

Elias options Lakins. (25 and 39)

Adds Allen to the 26 and 40 man rosters. (26 and 40)

Moves either A Wells or Ellis to the 60 man IL. (26 and 39)

Then he either 1) keeps Allen for a few days so Holt has watch him  (26 and 39) or

 2) DFAs Allen trying to get him through waiver to AAA. ( 25 and 38)

If  they do 2) then they promote Vespi to take Allen's spot on the 26 and 40 man rosters. ( 26 and 39) or

Call up Diplan (26 and 38)

Why option him when we can DFA  him and gain a 40 man roster spot.

Edited by Riggodrill44
Misspelled
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Riggodrill44 said:

Why option him when we can DFA  him and gain a 40 man roster spot.

I see this kind of comment a lot. We'll DFA him when we need the 40man spot, but not before. That's just bad management. You keep your assets until you're forced to DFA or release them. There are plenty of non-prospect guys pitching in the bullpen in Norfolk, so it's not likely Lakins would eat into any prospect time down there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Why?   Who do we need to make room for on the 40?

Why?  They can't help the team because they are injured.   No reason for them taking up space of the 40 man if they can't play.  Open the roster spot for Grayson, Stowers, Vespi, Uvila or Neustrom if needed.

Its roster management.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Why?  They can't help the team because they are injured.   No reason for them taking up space of the 40 man if they can't play.  Open the roster spot for Grayson, Stowers, Vespi, Uvila or Neustrom if needed.

Wasn't it you that pointed out the rule that you can't move someone to the 60 unless you need to for a corresponding move onto the 40?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

Wasn't it you that pointed out the rule that you can't move someone to the 60 unless you need to for a corresponding move onto the 40?

Nope.  The rule I posted says you can't put an injured player on the 60 day IL unless the 40 man roster is full.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Nope.  The rule I posted says you can't put an injured player on the 60 day IL unless the 40 man roster is full.

So you CAN move someone from the 10/15 to the 60?

OK, but still, why do that before it is necessary?   Whenever the time comes that you want to bring up Vespi or Adley, or whoever, you can do it then.    I don't see any logical benefit to doing it before you need to.   No harm either, but it just seems like an odd thing to be projecting.

Bottom line, when we need a 40 man spot to bring someone up, we have a few guys who can immediately move to the 60 day IL, and we also still have some guys on the roster who can be DFA'd and no one will shed any tears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SteveA said:

So you CAN move someone from the 10/15 to the 60?

OK, but still, why do that before it is necessary?   Whenever the time comes that you want to bring up Vespi or Adley, or whoever, you can do it then.    I don't see any logical benefit to doing it before you need to.   No harm either, but it just seems like an odd thing to be projecting.

Bottom line, when we need a 40 man spot to bring someone up, we have a few guys who can immediately move to the 60 day IL, and we also still have some guys on the roster who can be DFA'd and no one will shed any tears.

Let's see what Elias does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/5/2022 at 3:03 PM, wildcard said:

Allen has no options left.  

His WHIP is too high to stay on the 26 man roster very long.

This looks like a roster maneuver to me.   Elias can't put Alex Wells or Ellis on the 60 day IL unless the 40 man roster is full.  This claim allows Elias to move one of them to the 60 day IL.  Then Elias probably DFAs Allen to see if he can get him to AAA.    Just my guess.   

IMO Allen is not as good a lefty reliever as Fry. And I am not a big Fry fan.

Allen has a 91-92  four seamer that gets hit hard.  His slider is really his only decent pitch.  One pitch will probably not keep him in the majors.  He needs to develop his other pitches.

I'll be honest, I did not know that was a rule for the 60-day IL. Nice job pointing that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • When he first came up, his slider was very mediocre and only really used as a get me over change of pace. Now it seems like a weapon. I wonder if he went to school with Professor Bradish for that.
    • Yeah, kinda why I asked the question. That seems real lofty for a comparison.
    • After a really disappointing April that saw his ERA balloon to 7.78, Alex Pham has found his bearings in May, allowing 3 ER in 14.1 IP, allowing 8 hits and 4 walks while striking out 17.   Yesterday Pham allowed a run on 2 hits and a walk in 4.2 innings, striking out 7.   53 of 72 pitches were strikes.  The sole run charged to Pham scored when reliever Kyle Virbitsky allowed a 2-out double to the first batter he faced after relieving Pham in the fifth.    Due to the poor start, Pham’s ERA still rests at an unimpressive 5.29, but he’s definitely been headed in the right direction.  Also, he’s struck out 40 batters in 34 innings.     
    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...