Jump to content

O's were contenders!!


wildcard

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Or a glutton for punishment! lol..

Considering how much the organization cares, I probably wasted a lot of time!

We Care Alot about one thing.Trying to pay the least amount of rent and not giving the state otr city any revenue  when they host a concert at Camden Yards which the Angelos family didn't pay for. But they care so much about the city when John Angelos made his speech about helping the city after the riots.As they say talk is cheap and so are the Angelos family.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night's lineup shows how far we have to go to be "contenders". Yes, we have to take into consideration Mountcastle and Hays were out last night, but our 5-9 hitters last night are not major league hitters. Here are the OPSs of our 5-9 hitter and the our pinch hitter in the 9th.

5. Nevin - .528
6. Odor - . 567 - Urias PH - .536
7.  Bannon - .444
8.  Chirnos - .464
9. Owings . 527

Yes, we all realize as well that the ball is dead this year so hitting is down, but good lord, that's a black hole of offense. When the team has no better option than Bannon in the 9th against a hard throwin fastball, slider guy then it tells you the roster construction is not exactly balanced.

This is not to poo-poo on the team while they've been playing pretty decent until last night, just to show the team has a wasys to go before we start shooting off fireworks and thinking the Orioles are contenders.

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

I know you are not feeling the love from the O's management but the folks on the Hangout certainly appreciate everything you have done.  Its a great site that enhances the enjoyment of watching O's baseball for so many.

Elias  may be smart but he could use some lessons in PR.

Just curious. Why do you say Elias may be smart? Has he demonstrated that by doing stuff that anyone who's been around the game for a few years and had the resources wouldn't have thought to do? Has he made some decisions that appear to have been unusually wise? Has he come up with innovations that have improved the team? Has he fleeced other GMs in trades? Has he found talent deep in amateur drafts, and if so was that a result of his evaluations? Has he acquired an impressive collection of talent from other teams' scrap heaps? Anything else?

I'm not saying that he hasn't done any of these things or that he's not a real smart guy. And it may be that he was the very best guy who could have been hired for the daunting rebuild on a team controlled by Peter Angelos. After three-plus years, I really don't have a strong opinion about Elias. (I do think the way he's so dramatically deferred spending on payroll is not the best way to go about a rebuild, but I don't know whether he's stuck with that, and for the most part I'm satisfied to see how well his way works.) I can't think of anything he's done to demonstrate that he's especially smart or talented, unless you want to count lowering the bar by which his success should be assessed and putting off the vague time frame for making that assessment.

What have I missed? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Last night's lineup shows how far we have to go to be "contenders". Yes, we have to take into consideration Mountcastle and Hays were out last night, but our 5-9 hitters last night are not major league hitters. Here are the OPSs of our 5-9 hitter and the our pinch hitter in the 9th.

5. Nevin - .528
6. Odor - . 567 - Urias PH - .536
7.  Bannon - .444
8.  Chirnos - .464
9. Owings . 527

Yes, we all realize as well that the ball is dead this year so hitting is down, but good lord, that's a black hole of offense. When the team has no better option than Bannon in the 9th against a hard throwin fastball, slider guy then it tells you the roster construction is not exactly balanced.

This is not to poo-poo on the team while they've been playing pretty decent until last night, just to show the team has a wasys to go before we start shooting off fireworks and thinking the Orioles are contenders.

Here’s the Tigers lineup last night:

.608

.583

.706

.587

.415

.765

.559

.634

.579

Obviously the Tigers aren’t contenders either.

Getting Rutschman in the lineup will be a huge upgrade.   Getting Mountcastle and Hays back obviously would make a big difference   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Just curious. Why do you say Elias may be smart? Has he demonstrated that by doing stuff that anyone who's been around the game for a few years and had the resources wouldn't have thought to do? Has he made some decisions that appear to have been unusually wise? Has he come up with innovations that have improved the team? Has he fleeced other GMs in trades? Has he found talent deep in amateur drafts, and if so was that a result of his evaluations? Has he acquired an impressive collection of talent from other teams' scrap heaps? Anything else?

I'm not saying that he hasn't done any of these things or that he's not a real smart guy. And it may be that he was the very best guy who could have been hired for the daunting rebuild on a team controlled by Peter Angelos. After three-plus years, I really don't have a strong opinion about Elias. (I do think the way he's so dramatically deferred spending on payroll is not the best way to go about a rebuild, but I don't know whether he's stuck with that, and for the most part I'm satisfied to see how well his way works.) I can't think of anything he's done to demonstrate that he's especially smart or talented, unless you want to count lowering the bar by which his success should be assessed and putting off the vague time frame for making that assessment.

What have I missed? 

I do think that all the current GM's are probably super smart and well educated individuals.

I don't think you are going to see a Dave Stewart situation anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Last night's lineup shows how far we have to go to be "contenders". Yes, we have to take into consideration Mountcastle and Hays were out last night, but our 5-9 hitters last night are not major league hitters. Here are the OPSs of our 5-9 hitter and the our pinch hitter in the 9th.

5. Nevin - .528
6. Odor - . 567 - Urias PH - .536
7.  Bannon - .444
8.  Chirnos - .464
9. Owings . 527

Yes, we all realize as well that the ball is dead this year so hitting is down, but good lord, that's a black hole of offense. When the team has no better option than Bannon in the 9th against a hard throwin fastball, slider guy then it tells you the roster construction is not exactly balanced.

This is not to poo-poo on the team while they've been playing pretty decent until last night, just to show the team has a wasys to go before we start shooting off fireworks and thinking the Orioles are contenders.

 

 

I’ll give Nevin, Bannon and Chirinos a pass for now—Chirinos being an obvious stopgap and Nevin and Bannon auditioning for utility roles. Certainly hurts to have both the latter two in the lineup at once tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Last night's lineup shows how far we have to go to be "contenders". Yes, we have to take into consideration Mountcastle and Hays were out last night, but our 5-9 hitters last night are not major league hitters. Here are the OPSs of our 5-9 hitter and the our pinch hitter in the 9th.

5. Nevin - .528
6. Odor - . 567 - Urias PH - .536
7.  Bannon - .444
8.  Chirnos - .464
9. Owings . 527

Yes, we all realize as well that the ball is dead this year so hitting is down, but good lord, that's a black hole of offense. When the team has no better option than Bannon in the 9th against a hard throwin fastball, slider guy then it tells you the roster construction is not exactly balanced.

This is not to poo-poo on the team while they've been playing pretty decent until last night, just to show the team has a wasys to go before we start shooting off fireworks and thinking the Orioles are contenders.

 

 

Ok a ways.  McKenna  with a 375 OBP probably arrives today to play left.  Adley called up sometime this week.  Hays is supposed to be out a few days.   And Urias continue to be day to day.    

Mountcastle gone for a while is a gut punch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, survivedc said:

I’ll give Nevin, Bannon and Chirinos a pass for now—Chirinos being an obvious stopgap and Nevin and Bannon auditioning for utility roles. Certainly hurts to have both the latter two in the lineup at once tho.

Shouldn’t a utility player be able to defend well at multiple positions? Nevin can play 1B. We already have 2 of those. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Ok a ways.  McKenna  with a 375 OBP probably arrives today to play left.  Adley called up sometime this week.  Hays is supposed to be out a few days.   And Urias continue to be day to day.    

Mountcastle gone for a while is a gut punch.  

You’re gonna list his OBP at .375 in his 22 PAs this year? But ignore the .301 for his career?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Just curious. Why do you say Elias may be smart? Has he demonstrated that by doing stuff that anyone who's been around the game for a few years and had the resources wouldn't have thought to do? Has he made some decisions that appear to have been unusually wise? Has he come up with innovations that have improved the team? Has he fleeced other GMs in trades? Has he found talent deep in amateur drafts, and if so was that a result of his evaluations? Has he acquired an impressive collection of talent from other teams' scrap heaps? Anything else?

I'm not saying that he hasn't done any of these things or that he's not a real smart guy. And it may be that he was the very best guy who could have been hired for the daunting rebuild on a team controlled by Peter Angelos. After three-plus years, I really don't have a strong opinion about Elias. (I do think the way he's so dramatically deferred spending on payroll is not the best way to go about a rebuild, but I don't know whether he's stuck with that, and for the most part I'm satisfied to see how well his way works.) I can't think of anything he's done to demonstrate that he's especially smart or talented, unless you want to count lowering the bar by which his success should be assessed and putting off the vague time frame for making that assessment.

What have I missed? 

Has he fleeced other GMs in trades?   Yes, a broken down Bundy for Bradish.

Has he found talent deep in amateur drafts, and if so was that a result of his evaluations?  Well maybe not deep but paying overslot for Mayo looks pretty good right now.  That was not a mainstream move.

Has he acquired an impressive collection of talent from other teams' scrap heaps?  Yes, Mateo, Perez, Lopez, Krehbeil, Baker, Urias.

I think there are several smart things he has done:

1.  He evaluated what a mid market Baltimore team had to do to win and he has the patience and aggressiveness to pursue that goal.  Many GM start down the path of rebuilding and cave in to outside pressures along the way.  He has stuck to his focus and goals.

2) He brought Holt and Sig with him.  Holt has unify the pitching development from the majors through the minors.  And there are many stories of pitcher improvement  along the way from Means to Bradish to Tyler Wells to Bautista.  Sig has built the analytics dept from 1 to 15 or 20.  Many of the changes that have been made come from the research and analysis done in his shop.  And the coaches has been hire to translate and teach the players.  Pretty innovative stuff on the coaches hiring.

Elias says the big change in the analytics over the past five year as revolutionized player evaluation and development.  He has hired the people to change the O's organization.   That is a long way from where the O's were when he was hired.

I doubt if Peter had anything to do with his hiring.  I think it was the Sons.

Could anyone else have done it.  Probably but not to many would want to take on a complete rebuild for a low revenue team in the AL East.  Its got to be one of the hardest jobs for an MLB GM.

Is Elias perfect?  No but he  seems to be headed in the right direction over the next few year.  We should be happy about that.

  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, waroriole said:

You’re gonna list his OBP at .375 in his 22 PAs this year? But ignore the .301 for his career?

Yes I did.  And I am ignoring April for a lot of the players and looking at May because I think its a better assessment of their value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...