Jump to content

Give some credit to Hyde


Frobby

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Elias absolutely gets some credit for getting some guys in here who are performing and, theoretically, some of the programs that have instituted are helping.

Still, they are 23rd in the league in winning%, so it’s not like he built the ‘27 Yankees.

My comment was a bit tongue in cheek because we have trouble seeing the positive and easily focus on the critiques.  Leadership is easy to second guess all day long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

He is so under appreciated by this fan base.

I'm willing to admit that I've been wrong about him if you figure he's literally been told not to try to win games in the past. Yesterday was great in-game management. Also good and timely execution by the players (Hays' 9th inning hit, Perez continued to pitch extremely well, and Santander may well have saved the game in the top of the 11th), but everything noted in this thread so far is worthy of praise for Hyde. If he's truly been handcuffed all this time, I'd be excited to see what he does when he's allowed to go all in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sanfran327 said:

I'm willing to admit that I've been wrong about him if you figure he's literally been told not to try to win games in the past. Yesterday was great in-game management. Also good and timely execution by the players (Hays' 9th inning hit, Perez continued to pitch extremely well, and Santander may well have saved the game in the top of the 11th), but everything noted in this thread so far is worthy of praise for Hyde. If he's truly been handcuffed all this time, I'd be excited to see what he does when he's allowed to go all in.

Well, he’s not being told to not manage to win games.  But he’s being told to build a house with no workers and limited materials and tools.  
 

When myself or anyone else talks  about losing on purpose, it has nothing to do with the players or the manager. It never has.  Of course they are trying but they are running the 100M dash with their legs tied together.  Doesn’t mean they aren’t trying but they just can’t keep up.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well, he’s not being told to not manage to win games.  But he’s being told to build a house with no workers and limited materials and tools.  
 

When myself or anyone else talks  about losing on purpose, it has nothing to do with the players or the manager. It never has.  Of course they are trying but they are running the 100M dash with their legs tied together.  Doesn’t mean they aren’t trying but they just can’t keep up.

Honestly, I could go either way. We've seen enough of Hyde to know he's had more clunkers than games like yesterday. Instances where he could have pinch hit for someone with a much greater chance at executing in a big moment and things of that nature. Nobody is perfect, but some of those things felt like common sense. I'd prefer to think he's been told to throttle back in the past. It would give me a much higher opinion of him anyway. That's part of tanking, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

Honestly, I could go either way. We've seen enough of Hyde to know he's had more clunkers than games like yesterday. Instances where he could have pinch hit for someone with a much greater chance at executing in a big moment and things of that nature. Nobody is perfect, but some of those things felt like common sense. I'd prefer to think he's been told to throttle back in the past. It would give me a much higher opinion of him anyway. That's part of tanking, after all.

Ehh, I think it’s common sense when you can bring a player off the bench who is actually good.  But when it’s a decision between Odor or Owings, you really are screwed either way.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I can't remember the Orioles ever losing the DH. In addition to the constraints the team faced in this game, Palmer and Brown noted how he made several moves that paid off, bringing in Hays for Chirinos, pinch running McKenna etc.

Gregg Olson got an AB back in 1993 when the DH had to play a position.  He struck out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Elias absolutely gets some credit for getting some guys in here who are performing and, theoretically, some of the programs that have instituted are helping.

Still, they are 23rd in the league in winning%, so it’s not like he built the ‘27 Yankees.

More like the ‘67 Yankees.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...