Jump to content

Teixeira watch part IX....The final stages?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

That's great Tex, but the Angels PULLED their offer off the table. Hard to accept something that doesn't exist.

Roch eluded to something in his blog about the longer this goes on, the more friends Tex is losing. He is on to something. I want Tex in Baltimore more than anything, but the longer he drags this out, the more he is pissing me off, and probably the front offices of all these teams as well. I am hoping from a Baltimore perspective that the Angels and Sox did indeed pull out and tell Boras to take a hike. Make Tex decide between two losing teams like us and Washington. That would be great!

I think his reputation will take a big hit if this isn't done by Christmas. That was his self-imposed deadline. It's also clear that his agent is up to his usual games and that's dragging it out. If he can't meet his own deadline, it could call into questions his true motives behind signing a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think his reputation will take a big hit if this isn't done by Christmas. That was his self-imposed deadline. It's also clear that his agent is up to his usual games and that's dragging it out. If he can't meet his own deadline, it could call into questions his true motives behind signing a deal.

Bingo! I think this gets done tomorrow. Because if Teixiera has this self-imposed deadline, and he does not personally meet it because he's submitting himself to Boras for Boras to play his usual games, then Teixiera's reputation takes a big hit and we don't give him green PIPs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his reputation will take a big hit if this isn't done by Christmas. That was his self-imposed deadline. It's also clear that his agent is up to his usual games and that's dragging it out. If he can't meet his own deadline, it could call into questions his true motives behind signing a deal.

If we signs with New York or Boston, he'll be "just another millionaire" on a team full of them. But if he signs here, there's Roberts looking for an extension, Markakis looking for a payday, and countless young guys, all of whom I would imagine are none too happy that Tex tried to bleed their team of every possible last dollar that may have been added to their contract. Tex better make a choice and go with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo! I think this gets done tomorrow. Because if Teixiera has this self-imposed deadline, and he does not personally meet it because he's submitting himself to Boras for Boras to play his usual games, then Teixiera's reputation takes a big hit and we don't give him green PIPs!

So then my next question would be, where is Tex planning to spend the holiday?

He should've made it easier on himself and us by getting an honest agent... like Tellem and Kinzer... ah-hem....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Roch's response to one comment.

Roch,

Do you get the impression that the O's will at least get the chance to match or surpass the highest offer on Teixeira when/if the time comes?

Perhaps, maybe, just maybe the O's are holding back what they are really prepared to offer until they absolutely need to?

just a thought. Thanks for everything Roch.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know the Orioles are counting on that happening, but it's a risk. Imagine how bad Teixeira will look if he doesn't give the hometown team a chance at the end. - Roch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo! I think this gets done tomorrow. Because if Teixiera has this self-imposed deadline, and he does not personally meet it because he's submitting himself to Boras for Boras to play his usual games, then Teixiera's reputation takes a big hit and we don't give him green PIPs!

Jeez everyday people are saying it'll be the next day.

I just want him an Oriole NOWWWW!!:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources have confirmed to Sons of Simmons, that the Boston Red Sox have agreed in principle to an eight-year deal with first basemen Mark Teixeira. Details are still sketchy at the moment, but it looks to be for around $170 Million dollars, not the $195 Million that agent Scott Boras was asking for. We cannot confirm, but we have heard the Red Sox did not include an opt-clause in the contract.

Just more junk but it's a slow newsday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo! I think this gets done tomorrow. Because if Teixiera has this self-imposed deadline, and he does not personally meet it because he's submitting himself to Boras for Boras to play his usual games, then Teixiera's reputation takes a big hit and we don't give him green PIPs!

And he could just FOR-GET about ever getting a Bird! :cussing:

I keed. I keed. We love ya Tex. Please sign with us...please!? :pray:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would go 8/185. That's really making a compromise between what Boras wants (200 million) and what the Red Sox offer is (170).

Just playing devils advocate here. Why would you only go to 185?

It is not our money. I just want to see your reasoning?

I say go high enough to get it done. Whatever it is. The Orioles will be fine economically.

I think it is funny that people post these max offers they would go to, and nothing more.

I am just not sure how it is possible to quantify as to where these artificial numbers come from?

I am truly fascinated by it. And a little dumbfounded at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources have confirmed to Sons of Simmons, that the Boston Red Sox have agreed in principle to an eight-year deal with first basemen Mark Teixeira. Details are still sketchy at the moment, but it looks to be for around $170 Million dollars, not the $195 Million that agent Scott Boras was asking for. We cannot confirm, but we have heard the Red Sox did not include an opt-clause in the contract.

Just more junk but it's a slow newsday.

What the hell is this? Dude, this place is gonna explode with you posting that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources have confirmed to Sons of Simmons, that the Boston Red Sox have agreed in principle to an eight-year deal with first basemen Mark Teixeira. Details are still sketchy at the moment, but it looks to be for around $170 Million dollars, not the $195 Million that agent Scott Boras was asking for. We cannot confirm, but we have heard the Red Sox did not include an opt-clause in the contract.

Should that be taken at all seriously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources have confirmed to Sons of Simmons, that the Boston Red Sox have agreed in principle to an eight-year deal with first basemen Mark Teixeira. Details are still sketchy at the moment, but it looks to be for around $170 Million dollars, not the $195 Million that agent Scott Boras was asking for. We cannot confirm, but we have heard the Red Sox did not include an opt-clause in the contract.

Just more junk but it's a slow newsday.

How do you know this is junk? (Mind you, I didn't click on the link)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell is this? Dude, this place is gonna explode with you posting that!
Like I said, it's probably junk, but Dude, it's on the Internet.

The site doesn't appear to be fly-by-night however, and has been up a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sources have confirmed to Sons of Simmons, that the Boston Red Sox have agreed in principle to an eight-year deal with first basemen Mark Teixeira. Details are still sketchy at the moment, but it looks to be for around $170 Million dollars, not the $195 Million that agent Scott Boras was asking for. We cannot confirm, but we have heard the Red Sox did not include an opt-clause in the contract.

Just more junk but it's a slow newsday.

Is this a new contract, or was this just an offer that has been on the table for awhile?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Keep him,  but certainly don't plan on him helping the team at all this year. 
    • I think 2024 showed how tricky the "Platoon Every Position" strategy can be when you have rookies and injuries. With the rookies, you never give them opportunities to hit the same side pitching if they're constantly being PH hit for (Kjerstad, Holliday, Mayo even). And in the event somebody gets hurt (example: Mountcastle) you're stuck with a poor defending infielder that puts your infield defense at risk and you're vulnerable against their weak side pitching.  I do think you can get away with *some* platoons, but last year was way, way, way too heavy on platooning.  All that said, the O's are in a pretty weird spot.  Here are their stats  (minimum 40 PA) at home, against lefties from 2024: Mateo - 333 AVG, 1.010 OPS Mountcastle - 346, 971 Santander - 250, 926 Westburg - 277, 857 Adley - 303, 818 Gunnar - 246, 764 Cowser - 200, 585 Mullins - 205, 489 Pretty easy to say why there was a dramatic dropoff in performance last year against lefties (Mateo, Mounty, Westy) all were hurt in the second half. Meaning it was Santander and Adley (and we know Adley fell off in the second half). Gunnar fell off a cliff in the second half. Now let's look at our hitters against RHP at home (minimum 40 PA): Gunnar - 309, 961 Westy - 312, 903 Mullins - 263, 880 Cowser - 263, 809 Urias - 245, 733 O'Hearn - 249, 698 Santander - 207, 697 Mountcastle - 244, 679 Adley - 195, 616 Holliday - 176, 495 So, the Elias strategy of focusing on LHH, SHH to take advantage of left field at Camden Yards works...until it doesn't. Gunnar, Westy (very good against LHH and RHH at homE), Cowser all Elias picks, and very good to excellent against righties at home. Awesome. Mullins was definitely valuable. But man, 6-10 is incredibly glaring. Santander was lackluster against righties at home. We can see that O'Hearn wasn't better than Mountcastle at home against righties, supposedly his specialty. And I wonder if it's because he likes to hit opposite field and the vast caverns of LF at OPACY had a lot of doubles/dingers taken from him.  But, man, Adley was nearly as bad as Holliday against righties, and that's not acceptable.  So, they definitely need Adley and Holliday to do infinitely better against righties. But they need more production from 1B/RF against righties as well. 
    • Yeah true, forgot about that. That does make the contract a lot worse. It was Duquette hail mary at the end of the offseason. But years and dollars-wise, it wasn't (or shouldn't have been) that big of a deal. The pick sucks, though, no question. 
    • Best case for 2025, I would love to see him towards the back of the bullpen again. He's imposing and relatively effective, especially if we see an uptick in stuff.  I long for the 2023 bullpen with Felix and Wells bringing some meanness out there. 
    • He's a good pitcher and he has options. I would definitely keep him. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...