Jump to content

Garceau vs Newman


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Scott and Melanie had the radio together last night, and I have to say...it was bad.  I give them some benefit of the doubt due to the fact that they were calling games from OPACY, but there were so many plays in which I really had no idea what had happened based on the PBP call.  I think one thing they both need to get better at - in the past, even Joe Angel couldn't keep up with things as fast as it happened, but then he would immediately go back and describe the play in detail.  Neither Garceau nor Newman really do that, or if they do, not in a way that makes much sense.

They really need to get these folks on location.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Scott and Melanie had the radio together last night, and I have to say...it was bad.  I give them some benefit of the doubt due to the fact that they were calling games from OPACY, but there were so many plays in which I really had no idea what had happened based on the PBP call.  I think one thing they both need to get better at - in the past, even Joe Angel couldn't keep up with things as fast as it happened, but then he would immediately go back and describe the play in detail.  Neither Garceau nor Newman really do that, or if they do, not in a way that makes much sense.

They really need to get these folks on location.

From what I have listened to they do the exact same thing for home games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

Scott and Melanie had the radio together last night, and I have to say...it was bad.  I give them some benefit of the doubt due to the fact that they were calling games from OPACY, but there were so many plays in which I really had no idea what had happened based on the PBP call.  I think one thing they both need to get better at - in the past, even Joe Angel couldn't keep up with things as fast as it happened, but then he would immediately go back and describe the play in detail.  Neither Garceau nor Newman really do that, or if they do, not in a way that makes much sense.

They really need to get these folks on location.

I just got done watching the O's highlights from last night's game. Melanie Newman is downright awful. I could cite several examples but just one will suffice. Mountcastle a drive out to right...this one is...out of the bullpen. What?? Out of the bullpen? And to think we had the GOAT Jon Miller for all those years. Sigh.

And yes, she's just as bad at home games.

 

17 hours ago, Gentile4 said:

I don't mind Melanie, but good lord is Roch terrible in the tv booth. I'll take her any day over him. Stick to blogging, Roch.

 

19 hours ago, Brian88 said:

From what I have listened to they do the exact same thing for home games. 

 

Edited by Etch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard a couple of Melanie’s innings last night while driving home from a dinner.   She really is bad.   Forget the fact that there’s a pretty long delay between the crack of the bat (which you can hear) and a description of what happened.  The description itself just isn’t very, uh, descriptive.  

I feel bad for her because she’s very prepared and has a lot of good information to provide when the play isn’t happening.   She’s just not good at describing the action, and I don’t think the fact that she’s broadcasting from a monitor instead of live is the problem.  It just doesn’t come naturally to her.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I heard a couple of Melanie’s innings last night while driving home from a dinner.   She really is bad.   Forget the fact that there’s a pretty long delay between the crack of the bat (which you can hear) and a description of what happened.  The description itself just isn’t very, uh, descriptive.  

I feel bad for her because she’s very prepared and has a lot of good information to provide when the play isn’t happening.   She’s just not good at describing the action, and I don’t think the fact that she’s broadcasting from a monitor instead of live is the problem.  It just doesn’t come naturally to her.   
 

The producers give her alot of that information. Used to give out a press packet in the club level that had a ton of information on both teams  

This is one call. Two strikes on the batter The pitch under his hands and Martin catches it. Did he catch his hands?

She has been doing this for more then a few years now. Does she get better after a certain amount of  broadcasts like a guy called up from Triple A?  10 years?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're watching MASN as their main video feed, that can't be helping because the MASN broadcast has also been awful at tracking the action in Toronto. The camera cuts are late on most hits in this series. Any ball hit hard on the infield, you won't see the play being made because by the time the camera cuts to that angle, the fielder already has the ball or has missed the ball. It's even slow enough that it's affecting some hits to the outfield. They also missed cutting to second base altogether on one stolen base attempt. 

I've been wondering if they have an inexperienced directing crew in Toronto or some other technical/logistical issue related to the international travel, since they don't usually have these issues. 

Anyway, Garceau/Newman both struggle to describe plays even when they're in the stadium, so I can only imagine this is exacerbating the issue. Even if they can see a panel of other camera angles, the produced broadcast surely helps and that broadcast isn't always showing them the basic plays. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I heard a couple of Melanie’s innings last night while driving home from a dinner.   She really is bad.   Forget the fact that there’s a pretty long delay between the crack of the bat (which you can hear) and a description of what happened.  The description itself just isn’t very, uh, descriptive.  

I feel bad for her because she’s very prepared and has a lot of good information to provide when the play isn’t happening.   She’s just not good at describing the action, and I don’t think the fact that she’s broadcasting from a monitor instead of live is the problem.  It just doesn’t come naturally to her.   
 

She may be better as a sportscenter anchor type.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...