Jump to content

2022 3rd Round Pick (#81): Nolan McLean- P - (Jr) Oklahoma State University


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, foxfield said:

Angels can't keep all of their pitching.  We can trade for Joyce or someone better later.  :) 

Angels and Phillies are most in need of immediate pitching help to capitalize on their stars (Trout, Ohtani - if they can keep him, Harper) window of prime performance. The O's have pitchers in the upper minors ready to trickle in to Baltimore. Re-stocking the low- and high-A teams with top players is a good strategy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Probably.  But he didn't pitch much at all, which is really curious.  Looking at his stats and bio, sure seems more like a bat than an arm.

36% strikeout rate.  Even that is too much for the Orioles.    Reportedly mid 90's touching 98 out of the bullpen with good spin rates on a slider and cureball.   I'd guess they'll try to make a starter out of him.   35K's and 13 BB's in 25 IP using mostly a fastball.   Very physical looking pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I believe as a pitcher he made 2 appearances.  He also DH'd, played OF and 3b.  

23 appearances as a reliever.  25.1 innings, 20 hits, 13 walks 39 Ks.  Five saves.

.992 OPS as a hitter on a team that had an .893.  37 walks and 107 Ks in 290 PAs.  Which works out to a 37% K rate. I think that means he hit about .430 on balls in play.

So... Rougned Odor, but he also pitches the 8th inning?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

Yes, I think we still need starting pitching help badly. DL Hall has kind of been disappointing to me, and GRod needs to recover from an injury. Those are the only two that I think are near locks to be contributors on a good MLB team. Bradish has been horrible although there's still time. Other than that I'm not sure we have a lot of starting pitching coming up through the ranks. 

There were guys who don't need anywhere near the level of development that were available, and we have enough relievers already. 

If Hall is disappointing you this year then I think your expectations are little too high. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball America

 

McLean showed impressive raw power as a righthanded hitter and big arm strength with a fastball in the mid 90s out of high school. He made it to campus at Oklahoma State where he also was on the university’s football team initially, before dropping the sport and focusing on baseball. A two-way player with the Cowboys, McLean has continued to show massive raw power with top-end exit velocities around 110 mph, though that power has come with significant swing and miss. In 2022 McLean hit .285/.397/.595 with 19 home runs and 16 doubles, but he also struck out 107 times—good for a 36.9% strikeout rate. Because of that, teams might now be more excited about his upside as a pitcher. He posted a 4.97 ERA over 25.1 innings out of the bullpen, with 39 strikeouts (35.1 K%) and 13 walks (11.7 BB%). He attacks hitters with a high-usage fastball in the 94-95 mph range that’s been up to 98 this spring. While he overwhelmingly pitches off the fastball, McLean has shown some potential with both a mid-80s slider and upper-70s curveball that flashes hard, downward bite. Both pitches have impressive raw spin (in the 2,800-3,100 rpm range) but he’ll need to develop considerably more feel and consistency. McLean looks the part of a former football player on the mound, with an extremely physical and strong 6-foot-3, 205-pound frame.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Baseball America

 

McLean showed impressive raw power as a righthanded hitter and big arm strength with a fastball in the mid 90s out of high school. He made it to campus at Oklahoma State where he also was on the university’s football team initially, before dropping the sport and focusing on baseball. A two-way player with the Cowboys, McLean has continued to show massive raw power with top-end exit velocities around 110 mph, though that power has come with significant swing and miss. In 2022 McLean hit .285/.397/.595 with 19 home runs and 16 doubles, but he also struck out 107 times—good for a 36.9% strikeout rate. Because of that, teams might now be more excited about his upside as a pitcher. He posted a 4.97 ERA over 25.1 innings out of the bullpen, with 39 strikeouts (35.1 K%) and 13 walks (11.7 BB%). He attacks hitters with a high-usage fastball in the 94-95 mph range that’s been up to 98 this spring. While he overwhelmingly pitches off the fastball, McLean has shown some potential with both a mid-80s slider and upper-70s curveball that flashes hard, downward bite. Both pitches have impressive raw spin (in the 2,800-3,100 rpm range) but he’ll need to develop considerably more feel and consistency. McLean looks the part of a former football player on the mound, with an extremely physical and strong 6-foot-3, 205-pound frame.

Drafted for that high spin rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

Angels and Phillies are most in need of immediate pitching help to capitalize on their stars (Trout, Ohtani - if they can keep him, Harper) window of prime performance. The O's have pitchers in the upper minors ready to trickle in to Baltimore. Re-stocking the low- and high-A teams with top players is a good strategy 

I am fine with what the O's are doing.  I don't admit to always understanding it.  It seems to be a very focused set of specific player type.  It seems they believe they can unlock something in them.  If they can do that consistently with guys, they will extract significant excess value.

There were some pretty attractive high upside starting pitching going into late yesterday and today.  They say some of that went just before they picked.  We will see.  But the idea of stocking the lower teams with some high risk high reward players seems very smart.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

36% strikeout rate.  Even that is too much for the Orioles.    Reportedly mid 90's touching 98 out of the bullpen with good spin rates on a slider and cureball.   I'd guess they'll try to make a starter out of him.   35K's and 13 BB's in 25 IP using mostly a fastball.   Very physical looking pitcher.

The fun of this one for me is more Felix Bautista-ish. 

The nice thing about pitch data is it doesn't take a large sample size to have signficance.   My guess is this is more like enough pitches met certain parameters to make us like him more than 29 other Clubs.

Jackson Holliday's uncle is the OSU coach right?    Kind of figure the area scouts who saw Holliday also saw him a bit.

Maybe our first stab at the Gregg Olson, Chris Ray type guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

The fun of this one for me is more Felix Bautista-ish. 

The nice thing about pitch data is it doesn't take a large sample size to have signficance.   My guess is this is more like enough pitches met certain parameters to make us like him more than 29 other Clubs.

Jackson Holliday's uncle is the OSU coach right?    Kind of figure the area scouts who saw Holliday also saw him a bit.

Maybe our first stab at the Gregg Olson, Chris Ray type guy?

I'm guessing they try to stretch him out as a starter.    A reliever in the 4th doesn't sound like their M.O.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

I'm guessing they try to stretch him out as a starter.    A reliever in the 4th doesn't sound like their M.O.

We'll see.    To exaggerate I kind of could picture him already ahead of Jordan Lyles on the Roster Power Rankings if we play the Central champ three games in October.

We know the Bats selection pattern, but Arms is still kind of a blank slate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...