Jump to content

Kyle Stowers called up


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

While Hyde's answer was brutal, it was honest because he is doing the best he can to win games in a playoff race, for him, the fat lady doesn't sing until mathematical elimination. He isn't playing the rookies to improve their performance in 2023. I doubt ME is instructing Hyde to do that at any level.

For a team that does many things on the measurable of the game, some decisions are utter head-scratchers!  Looking at Hays season and recent stats, and comparing his and Stowers splits, I can see a clear path to sitting Hays at least against LHP.   Whether we like it or not, it likely falls in the veteranosity or “ride the horses that got you here” buckets. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s time to just be honest about Stowers… he has terrible ABs consistently and his defense has been poor. These are things to be worked on over the summer and in ST next year, and not at the MLB level. 

How’s that any different from Hays? At least at Stowers point his career he has a better chance of improving. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Brian88 said:

How’s that any different from Hays? At least at Stowers point his career he has a better chance of improving. 

Hays has better ABs and is better defensively. Stowers will get his shots, and I’m not down on him that much, but ST is where those will happen. Same with Vavra. 
 

This team has battled way too hard this year to kick the ball around like little leaguers and lose our momentum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Hays has better ABs and is better defensively. Stowers will get his shots, and I’m not down on him that much, but ST is where those will happen. Same with Vavra. 
 

This team has battled way too hard this year to kick the ball around like little leaguers and lose our momentum. 

Did you not see Hays fumbling around in LF last night? He’s been bad at the plate and in the field the majority of the season. What momentum are we risking losing? They are playing poorly already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brian88 said:

Did you not see Hays fumbling around in LF last night? He’s been bad at the plate and in the field the majority of the season. What momentum are we risking losing? They are playing poorly already.

Who wants to finish 2-14. We’ve come too far. I’ll stick it out with what got us here and take 82-80. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brian88 said:

Did you not see Hays fumbling around in LF last night? He’s been bad at the plate and in the field the majority of the season. What momentum are we risking losing? They are playing poorly already.

Yeah I don't get the argument that we will be sacrificing something by playing Stowers. Defensively, probably. Put him in right field and give him some at bats. 

It's amazing to me that they are so analytical up and down the organization yet somehow don't realize that Stowers hits both righties and lefties effectively. Maybe they value Hays' defensive advantage over Stowers likely offensive advantage - but for the love of God Hays has been a pit of despair for awhile now and the team needs some offensive help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how Stowers has been using the whole field. 
 

His first hit was a double to left center, both of his HRs so far are to center, and his RBI single today and rally starting single on Sunday were to center and left respectively. 
 

The Luke Scott comparisons made me subliminally expect more of a dead pull hitter. I could be wrong but my memory is that a vast majority of Scott’s HRs were to the flag court & Eutaw St area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Nice game for Stowers all the way around.  Two run homer, RBI single, and three difficult catches in the outfield, though perhaps he made them look a little harder than they should have been. Anyway, nice game.  

How did he make them look tougher?  First one was a line drive fly over his head.  Made a nice back hand outstretched catch.  In the 9th, he was getting close to the wall and went into a slide and never took his eye off the ball.  Excellent catch. Last out was a catch on the run and he went into a slide like all outfielders.   He deserves credit for 3 nice plays, not some faint praise like he turned ordinary plays into tough looking catches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Nice game for Stowers all the way around.  Two run homer, RBI single, and three difficult catches in the outfield, though perhaps he made them look a little harder than they should have been. Anyway, nice game.  

I agree, he made three nice plays in the field, but he did make two of them look a little harder than they were... still, he's clearly got some athleticism working for him.  At the plate he absolutely smoked that homer to center.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...