Jump to content

"Moves that completely befuddle us" 2022-23 offseason edition


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This is what some people seem to be missing. Why would they think they need Cave or Bemboom in the first place. Why would they need to be "protected" from filing FA, If you can sign these kinds of guys as minor league free agents in the off season?

Shake a minor league tree and ten Cave and Bemboom's fall out. Adding AAA filler on the 40-man right now doesn't mean much because I agree, these guys will most likely be gone before the 40-man is set this December, but it's certainly befuddling that they feel a need to add them now.

BTW, who they dropped off don't matter since there are plenty of guys that can be dropped without concern. It's who they are adding right now that's very, very strange.

 

They did moves like this in the past, only to just cut the players later.

I wouldn’t read anything into these moves until it’s necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

They did moves like this in the past, only to just cut the players later.

I wouldn’t read anything into these moves until it’s necessary. 

I don't recall them adding 33 year old back up AAA catchers and a 30-year old outfielder who can't hit to the roster in the past. 

Most of the guys they've done this with our younger guys they could claim, the DFA and try to outright them to AAA instead of bidding with other teams for their services. 

Nobody would be bidding on Bemboom or Cave. 

I'm not reading anything into the moves, they just completely and utterly befuddle me why these were necessary moves. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this is just Elias's way of keeping this site energised until after the WS ends. 😀 Working too!  

83-79 allows for me anyway some more time to evaluate.

Check with me in late January/early February to gage the "Pissed Button"! Then we can scope Elias's words to deeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like what Elias and Sig have done to help build this team back. The farm system is stacked and starting to bear fruit and we have a surprising season that shows we are ready to flip the switch and be contenders. 

That said, this front office does like to "get cute" with moves from time-to-time and show they're the smartest ones in the room. I think that is what this is. They're getting cute with stocking AAA depth that will be DFA'ed and then kept as no other team grabs them when players are flying later. Sure, they could easily get players just like these by just signing minor league contracts, but that would be too conventional. In the end, I expect these moves to be pointless as I would be wildly disappointed if Bemboom and Cave make it to spring on the 40-man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't recall them adding 33 year old back up AAA catchers and a 30-year old outfielder who can't hit to the roster in the past. 

Most of the guys they've done this with our younger guys they could claim, the DFA and try to outright them to AAA instead of bidding with other teams for their services. 

Nobody would be bidding on Bemboom or Cave. 

I'm not reading anything into the moves, they just completely and utterly befuddle me why these were necessary moves. 

I agree they are dumb moves. Just don’t think it means anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

They did moves like this in the past, only to just cut the players later.

I wouldn’t read anything into these moves until it’s necessary. 

That’s how I feel.   I’ll pay attention when the moves are made to protect players from the Rule 5 draft.  If Bemboom or Cave is still on the roster then, I’ll take a real careful look at who the O’s left off the 40 man roster instead of Bemboom and Cave.   But I suspect I won’t have to worry about it.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s how I feel.   I’ll pay attention when the moves are made to protect players from the Rule 5 draft.  If Bemboom or Cave is still on the roster then, I’ll take a real careful look at who the O’s left off the 40 man roster instead of Bemboom and Cave.   But I suspect I won’t have to worry about it.   

So you aren't the least bit interested in why a professional GM would add 30 plus year players onto his 40-man roster for what seems like no real reason to make his organization better? 

He could sign a Eddie Gaedel's ghost and you'd be like, eh, who cares, right? 

No, these players don't matter. What matters is that the GM is making moves that make zero sense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

So you aren't the least bit interested in why a professional GM would add 30 plus year players onto his 40-man roster for what seems like no real reason to make his organization better? 

He could sign a Eddie Gaedel's ghost and you'd be like, eh, who cares, right? 

No, these players don't matter. What matters is that the GM is making moves that make zero sense.

He’d rather have Bemboom and Cave than Castro and Reed.   That makes sense.  But I suspect later he’ll rather have two other people than Bemboom and Cave.  Until then, they’re here.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2022 at 5:54 PM, Tony-OH said:

So you aren't the least bit interested in why a professional GM would add 30 plus year players onto his 40-man roster for what seems like no real reason to make his organization better? 

He could sign a Eddie Gaedel's ghost and you'd be like, eh, who cares, right? 

No, these players don't matter. What matters is that the GM is making moves that make zero sense.

Hey, Gaedel's career OBP was 1.000 so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...