Jump to content

Are the Orioles done?


interloper

Are the Orioles done?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Orioles done?

    • Yep - no more 40-man roster additions. They're rolling with who they have now.
    • Basically - maybe an O'Hearn type or two, but nothing serious.
    • Nah - I still think they'll sign a Wacha/Cueto/Greinke type starting pitcher.
    • Nah - big trade incoming that will reshape this off-season.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I voted for the trade option. I’ll be surprised if there isn’t at least one trade with 26 and 40 man roster implications. I’m not sure we’ll see a “big trade that reshapes the off-season” but that seemed closest. 
 

Another minor pitcher signing near spring training wouldn’t surprise me either. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

I have absolutely no idea. Appears they have taken care of the needs. Question is whether to do any "wants". I do see pitching as a potential weakness and at this point I am more interested in trades than remaining free agents 

I think Gibson was the only "need".

The other positions could have been filled by players on hand.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there may be a trade coming... just not a big trade as implied in the poll question. 

 

Unless they plan on washing their hands on some of these guys and sending them to the MiL again, they almost have to do something for roster relief. I don't think it reshapes the off season though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

My belief is that a trade is coming for a TOR SP. No idea who it is though.

I admire your optimism. I thought this would be the case for most of the off-season until pretty recently. I just don't get the sense they want to actually get rid of any of their ML guys or their prospects until the deadline. Sure would be fun though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

I admire your optimism. I thought this would be the case for most of the off-season until pretty recently. I just don't get the sense they want to actually get rid of any of their ML guys or their prospects until the deadline. Sure would be fun though!

Roch has said in one of his posts not to long ago, maybe before xmas that the O's still want another SP. So there is some precedent for a move. I dont think their done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think they will still acquire a credible starting pitcher.  Don’t know if it’s option 3 or option 4.   

I chose Option 3 because like you I think they'll acquire a starting pitcher.  I couldn't roll with 4 because I'm not sure anything that Elias does will qualify as "big."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...