Jump to content

Orioles five year lease extension expires today.


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

They really have until December 31,2023 to sign a new lease. Maybe they will have a month to month lease next year.

From the Baltimore Sun:

 

Even if they pick up the option, the Orioles could be well served to have a long-term deal in place sooner rather than later. It not only would erase any remaining fears among the fan base about them potentially moving elsewhere, but it also would allow the team to take advantage of a 2022 state law that would let the stadium authority borrow up to $600 million to pay for improvements at Camden Yards.

The same applied to the Ravens’ M&T Bank Stadium, and after reaching a new 15-year lease that includes two five-year options, the football team has started to plan potential upgrades.

Orioles officials have long hinted at changes they want to make to Camden Yards, including reducing the number of seats and adding social spaces. The team also could make further alterations to the stadium’s playing area after moving the ballpark’s left field wall back before the 2022 season.

For the changes to the wall, the Orioles are receiving a yearly rent credit from the stadium authority for the nearly $3 million expense, which will be covered in full only if the team plays at Camden Yards through 2026. Exercising the option by Wednesday’s deadline would get them there. But other upgrades would have to wait for a long-term lease.

Orioles facing one-time lease extension deadline as wait for long-term agreement continues – Baltimore Sun
https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-lease-extension-option-deadline-20230131-5pwarnfplnamliif4dytglydby-story.html

Edited by Going Underground
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little speculation here. (It seems that speculation has become my main mode of talking about the Orioles since they don't do or say much, and say even less that can be relied on.)

It's possible that Goldman has advised John Angelos (or, less likely, he's figured it out himself) that a buyer would prefer a shorter lease because it figures, rightly or wrongly, it can negotiate a better deal than an idiot like John Angelos, possibly including the favorite tactic of sports team owners: "if you don't do better than that for me, I'll have to think about moving the team." John has pretty well blocked himself from making that threat.

Or maybe John's been told that the deadline for the five-year extension is next week, and he thinks that means the deadline rolls over forever since there's always a next week in the future. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Anyone else notice how much John Angelos has been talking up Wes Moore, who immediately after being inaugurated fired the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority, who I assume was in the midst of negotiating this lease extension? Does it mean anything? I have no idea, just thought it was interesting.

Like it or not, owning a massive business that gets public financing means you have to be a politician. The Angelos' have always rode in Democrat circles, so it makes sense that he might have something better in the works with Moore's people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Anyone else notice how much John Angelos has been talking up Wes Moore, who immediately after being inaugurated fired the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority, who I assume was in the midst of negotiating this lease extension? Does it mean anything? I have no idea, just thought it was interesting.

Kelso ,the head of the MSA said he is staying on till a replacement is found and is still negotiating with the Orioles. Kelso was a big donor to former governor, Larry Hogan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Anyone else notice how much John Angelos has been talking up Wes Moore, who immediately after being inaugurated fired the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority, who I assume was in the midst of negotiating this lease extension? Does it mean anything? I have no idea, just thought it was interesting.

This is where I’m at with this. With being as apolitical as I can, I think this was delayed until there was a new sheriff in town.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

A little speculation here. (It seems that speculation has become my main mode of talking about the Orioles since they don't do or say much, and say even less that can be relied on.)

It's possible that Goldman has advised John Angelos (or, less likely, he's figured it out himself) that a buyer would prefer a shorter lease because it figures, rightly or wrongly, it can negotiate a better deal than an idiot like John Angelos, possibly including the favorite tactic of sports team owners: "if you don't do better than that for me, I'll have to think about moving the team." John has pretty well blocked himself from making that threat.

Or maybe John's been told that the deadline for the five-year extension is next week, and he thinks that means the deadline rolls over forever since there's always a next week in the future. 

Having just gone through my company getting acquired and being quite involved in gathering info on financial commitments, I agree.  I'm not in finance or accounting, so I'm not entirely clear on why, but it was very evident to me that open financial commitments such as leases aren't desirable to potential buyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the Baltimore Sun:

 

 

Orioles to decline 5-year Camden Yards lease extension, seek to secure  long 

-- 

 

 

The Orioles will decline an option to extend their Camden Yards lease by five more years, planning instead to secure a longer-term, more comprehensive stadium agreement, according to two people with knowledge of the situation.

The lease expires at the end of 2023, and the baseball team expects to reach a new agreement by then with the Maryland Stadium Authority, the sources told The Baltimore Sun on Wednesday. They are familiar with the thinking of negotiators, but requested anonymity because the decision had not yet been announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
    • Tell me the cost and I would probably sign up. What about you Qauntrill, Scherzer and Yates and you got to keep all top 4 prospects?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...