Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

It might be time to invest in a sports psychologist. 

The moment was just too big for him and he couldn't self-correct.

It was really painful to watch.

Multi-million dollar arm.....

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

Grayson was solid the whole second half and has good control so getting knocked out in the 2nd inning and giving up 4 walks certainly seems to suggest that yesterday was very uncharacteristic for him.  So, how can we explain it?   The long layoff?   Just a coincidence to have his worst game of the year yesterday?   Too hyped up or nervous and couldn’t get it together enough to settle down?   I don’t really know but the last one is my best guess for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Grayson was solid the whole second half and has good control so getting knocked out in the 2nd inning and giving up 4 walks certainly seems to suggest that yesterday was very uncharacteristic for him.  So, how can we explain it?   The long layoff?   Just a coincidence to have his worst game of the year yesterday?   Too hyped up or nervous and couldn’t get it together enough to settle down?   I don’t really know but the last one is my best guess for now.

Does it need to be explained other than "he just didn't have his best stuff?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

It's just BS. You don't get to MLB and have moments that are too big for you. He just had a bad day. That happens.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made him throw strikes yesterday, which was a challenge for him with the lack of command. That’s all. I have every confidence in him being the star that they (and we) believe him to be headed towards.

I posted that I thought Texas was a better matchup for Means than GrayRod yesterday. Perhaps if Meansy doesn’t experience the elbow soreness he gets the ball yesterday instead. I guess we will never truly know because you know that management won’t come out and say it if it’s true.

The kid threw a clunker. It was evident from the first batter that he didn’t have his command yesterday. I blame Hyde for leaving him in when everyone in the stadium knew that he was struggling to find the strike zone and didn’t seem to completely trust his stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, banks703 said:

The kid threw a clunker. It was evident from the first batter that he didn’t have his command yesterday. I blame Hyde for leaving him in when everyone in the stadium knew that he was struggling to find the strike zone and didn’t seem to completely trust his stuff. 

When would you have taken him out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed like a bad omen when Grayson got to two strikes on Semien in the first AB of the game, only to surrender a soft single (EV 68) to LF. He got to two strikes on every batter in the first inning but allowed the single and the walks to Seager and Carter (who, granted, benefited from an egregious call on 3-and-2).

He continued to look like pre-demotion Grayson when he got to 2-and-2 on Lowe before walking him with two four-seam fastballs that missed inside. He had two strikes on Taveras (two-run double on a 1-and-2 four-seam fastball), Seager (BB on a 3-and-2 four-seam fastball), Garver (swinging-bunt RBI single on an 0-and-2 changeup), and Heim (RBI single on an 0-and-2 four-seam fastball) before he was lifted.

As in his April and May struggles, he was not putting hitters away. I don't know if it was pitch selection or something else, but it was an inopportune time to revert to his early form. Hoping he gets a chance to redeem himself out of the bullpen in a Game 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He laid an egg.     

One of the things I'll wonder is if more experience would have helped.     In the aggregate, Elias' decisions have of course been great.

The Club will have control of Grayson's 2029 season, which probably will be very valuable.

The 2022 team was not supposed to win, and that year Grayson's talent was conserved and/or polished while Watkins/Voth/Zimmermann made 50 starts.

His ability to render championship caliber performance yesterday might have been greater if he had more MLB seasoning.

Backs to the wall, but still a small chance he'll get to try again on Friday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

The moment was too big for Kershaw the other day.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Agreed, but it just seems a little more pronounced with Jorge.
    • That can be said about most hitters in the major leagues. 
    • If you execute your slider, you are in good shape against Mateo. If you hang your slider, RIP.
    • Yes - see Tony’s top 75 prospect ratings for last offseason. Miguel was ranked 35th. Strong defensive catcher with plus contact skills. Power was absent last year but emerged yesterday. I’d expect he’ll be top 15 by end of year. 
    • Baseball will change, there's almost no doubt about that. But it's very unlikely to change back to the ways of 50 or 100 years ago because there's no competitive advantage to do so. It will probably change in ways that we don't fully expect, and that haven't happened before. Unless the powers-that-be change the rules and conditions, which they've always been very reluctant to do, the strategies of today are the strategies of today because they win a lot more games than the strategies of 1970. I think it's more likely that we see individual pitchers pitch even less in each outing (although possibly more frequently) than it is we go back to complete games. Even if the rules are changed, say you can only have nine pitchers on the roster like was common 50 years ago, today's GMs and managers would just use each pitcher for three innings every three games instead of a four-man rotation with lots of complete games.
    • I try to not get too caught up in Mateo but I have to be honest. Watching him in person is just a treat. Love that he is playing so well and continue to be happy he is still an Oriole. 
    • Isn't is just weird that it took 100+ years to figure that out? Hey, that guy hits a bunch of balls right through the box, maybe we should have the second baseman move over that direction a little? Nah, if we do it so will everybody, and we like .350 hitters even when they're on the other team. It would be like a football game where there's a formation where a WR keeps getting completely open downfield and busting 40 yard plays, and it takes 35 years for defenses to adjust. "It's just how it is! If we cover that guy, then the running back might average five yards a carry!"
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...