Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, banks703 said:

If we look at how much Gunnar has improved at SS this year, playing half of the season as a 21 year old, playing half of the season as a 3B, it's pretty remarkable that he has progressed as much as he has. Prior to the season I had both of Joey and Jorge ahead of Gunnar as a defender but I think that he's right there with both of those guys and I would probably put him ahead of Jorge.

Gunnar (8 DRS) currently ranks 7th while having played only 432 innings at SS this year. The guys that are ahead of him:

Franco 948 innings (17 DRS)

Swanson 1046 innings (15 DRS)

Volpe 1127 innings (14 DRS)

Rojas 782 innings (11 DRS)

Lindor 1132 innings 11 (DRS)

Tovar 1099 innings (9 DRS)

Gunnar's DRS pace (had he played equal innings to Lindor this year) would be 21.. he would be four DRS better than Wander Franco. 

UZR and OAA both have Gunnar at exactly 0, which I find strange but not completely unexpected because of how they're measured. For reference, Jorge's OAA is at 2 but I don't think he's played that well there. I don't think he's played as well as Gunnar at SS this year. 

Again, what I have been stating about Holliday and Gunnar and the rest of the SS in the system is that Holliday is not going to be the best defensive option at the position.

 

He doesn’t have to be the best defensive option to be the one who gets the job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Today's Rangers with Seager and Semien maybe resemble how the Orioles will look assuming

 

 

I've stated multiple times that I see the combo of Gunnar and Holliday being comparable to Seager and Semien. I think this is what the O's have in Gunnar and Holliday for about $500 million cheaper than what the Rangers pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

He doesn’t have to be the best defensive option to be the one who gets the job.

 

Buddy, this is just not a sensible argument. We're now disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing.

We'll see where things are in two years when Gunnar has a gold glove and a silver slugger award. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, banks703 said:

Buddy, this is just not a sensible argument. We're now disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing.

We'll see where things are in two years when Gunnar has a gold glove and a silver slugger award. 

Im not now nor will I ever be your buddy.

Third base matters in this discussion as well.

If the Os do not have an above average, very good defensive third baseman (not sure Mayo qualifies as that), the choice very well could be have an elite GG level third baseman and a very good SS vs a very good SS and and average or so third baseman.

Ortiz could factor into this as well…or he could be traded or the Os may want him at second. The FG article that you love to quote now also threw some shade at Ortiz at SS.

All of this is to say that there is a lot to be decided here and what happens at second, third and the trade market will factor into what happens at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are we determining this? By what some guy wrote about him in an article a few pages back? In case anyone forgot, Gunnar was rated as a 50 fielder, even last season, when he was a prospect. Holliday is rated as a 55 fielder right now. They are both rated the same speed and Gunnar has a 65 arm vs. the more than adequate 55 that Holliday is rated at. 

We have to believe these people, right? It's what they do for a living, as was suggested earlier.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Im not now nor will I ever be your buddy.

Third base matters in this discussion as well.

If the Os do not have an above average, very good defensive third baseman (not sure Mayo qualifies as that), the choice very well could be have an elite GG level third baseman and a very good SS vs a very good SS and and average or so third baseman.

Ortiz could factor into this as well…or he could be traded or the Os may want him at second. The FG article that you love to quote now also threw some shade at Ortiz at SS.

All of this is to say that there is a lot to be decided here and what happens at second, third and the trade market will factor into what happens at SS.

I quoted the fangraphs article once. I'd hardly define that as loving to quote it but alright. 

You should google the term ad hominem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Malike said:

How are we determining this? By what some guy wrote about him in an article a few pages back? In case anyone forgot, Gunnar was rated as a 50 fielder, even last season, when he was a prospect. Holliday is rated as a 55 fielder right now. They are both rated the same speed and Gunnar has a 65 arm vs. the more than adequate 55 that Holliday is rated at. 

We have to believe these people, right? It's what they do for a living, as was suggested earlier.

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

But, but, the scouting community has rated Holliday a 55 fielder vs. a 50 for Gunnar. This is some metaverse-type crap, I guess, where lower is better? Or, maybe the scouts are only infallible when it proves someone's point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

Again, Google ad hominem. It may help you understand more of yourself.

I wonder who hurt you. 
 

I extended a ban-bet to you which you conveniently passed over. You’re so confident in what you think you know, take it. One of us will be right, the other will leave the board.

Your routine of personally attacking people when they disagree with you is tired, good buddy. Take the ban-bet. 

Edited by banks703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

But, but, the scouting community has rated Holliday a 55 fielder vs. a 50 for Gunnar. This is some metaverse-type crap, I guess, where lower is better? Or, maybe the scouts are only infallible when it proves someone's point?

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

If we're going off scout grades, Holliday grades out a 70 overall. That usually doesn't suggest a ploddingly slow baserunner or iron glove defender. We'll see. To suggest Holliday isn't athletic or fast is seriously pretty funny, though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

If we're going off scout grades, Holliday grades out a 70 overall. That usually doesn't suggest a ploddingly slow baserunner or iron glove defender. We'll see. To suggest Holliday isn't athletic or fast is seriously pretty funny, though.

No one has ever suggested that he isn’t fast or athletic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

And the back pedaling begins. 
 

Two years from now I’m sure you’ll reference how you always thought that Gunnar would stick at SS and you’ll cite this post, right? 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, banks703 said:

And the back pedaling begins. 
 

Two years from now I’m sure you’ll reference how you always thought that Gunnar would stick at SS and you’ll cite this post, right? 
 

 

I’m not backpedaling at all. I fully expect Holliday to be there. I think he puts in the work needed because him being a SS is how he maxes out his value. But he still has to do it.

Maybe he gets complacent and lazy? I can’t predict that but I don’t think that will be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is it right here. The ideal scenario. 
    • Definitely don't want Soto back.  I'm on the fence w/ Dominguez. I guess he's a fine hedge in the event that Felix isn't effective from the jump.  I don't want Rogers on this roster. As said before, I want an open competition for the 5th spot between Suarez, Povich, McDermott, Rogers. If Suarez doesn't make the rotation, he goes into the bullpen. Povich/McDermott/Rogers all have options. If I had it my way, here's what the 13 pitcher breakdown would be: SP1: Free Agent Signing (Snell, Burnes, Fried, etc.) SP2: Eflin SP3: Grayson SP4: Kremer SP5: Free Agent Signing and/or competition w/ Suarez, McDermott, Rogers, Povich Closer: Felix High Leverage: Coulombe High Leverage: Free Agent Signing Middle Reliever: Free Agent Signing *or* Dominguez Middle Reliever: Cano Middle Reliever: Webb Middle Reliever: Akin Middle/Long Reliever: Suarez I'd like to see this club sign a SP1, SP5, a high leverage arm and a reliable middle reliever type..
    • Have you not noticed, Frobby is not among us and I don't blame him one bit. Has been absent since last Wednesday evening.  By the way, I long lost track of any point and particularly relevance this discussion has to Burnes and 400 million.  Seems we are revisiting a lot of he should have - they could of - why can't we now. Great tangent though! Again, for the record, I believe no one is going to give Burnes anything close to 400 million. So my answer to the OP is again - No One!!!!
    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...