Jump to content

4/29/1988


jdwilde1

Recommended Posts

What was amazing was how quickly we went from World Series champs to horrible.  The 88 team also had two hall of fame players in their prime.  I never thought the Orioles would have a team as bad as that  again, but we've had three teams worse since 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Really awesome the people of Baltimore came out to support the O's when they came back to town after going 0-21.  Baltimore can't even support a winning team like that now.

Being awful and irrelevant for over a decade- at the same time baseball in generally was losing popularity- was nearly fatal. I'd take 100 1988s over the dark years of the 2000s. Fans can get past a bad year, it's just a blip. But extended losing leads to people just not bothering to pay attention anymore.

2012-2016 was a nice shot in the arm, but then followed by another long swoon. Hopefully something special is on the horizon with the current stacked farm system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

It really sucks when your hopes for the season have been irretrievably crushed by mid-April.  

I remember in 1984 (the season following the O's WS win) when the Tigers shot out to a 35-5 start, finished May at 37-9. The O's were out 9.5 games on April 30 and 10.5 games on May 31. In the pre-wild card era you had the sense that there was no coming back from that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tbone83 said:

Being awful and irrelevant for over a decade- at the same time baseball in generally was losing popularity- was nearly fatal. I'd take 100 1988s over the dark years of the 2000s. Fans can get past a bad year, it's just a blip. But extended losing leads to people just not bothering to pay attention anymore.

2012-2016 was a nice shot in the arm, but then followed by another long swoon. Hopefully something special is on the horizon with the current stacked farm system.

This is 100 spot on. My dad took me to my first game in 1988 and I've been on the birdland express ever since. The train has been derailed, or stuck at the station, for most of the years I've been watching. Plenty of dreadful seasons with a few sprinkles of joy. Hopefully the pendulum is swinging towards an extended period of winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I remember in 1984 (the season following the O's WS win) when the Tigers shot out to a 35-5 start, finished May at 37-9. The O's were out 9.5 games on April 30 and 10.5 games on May 31. In the pre-wild card era you had the sense that there was no coming back from that.  

I remember the O’s lost a doubleheader to Detroit (looking back, it was on June 10) and that felt like the death knell.  They’d been trailing Detroit all year and that was their last chance to close some ground.  I think I went to that DH, but I’m not sure.  

But 1988 was something else altogether.  That team was just so awful.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kaj21206 said:

What was amazing was how quickly we went from World Series champs to horrible.  The 88 team also had two hall of fame players in their prime.  I never thought the Orioles would have a team as bad as that  again, but we've had three teams worse since 2017.

Happens more often than you think. Look at how the Nats bombed after 2019. Even the O’s, while they didn’t win the WS in 2014, went from 96 wins to 47 wins in 4 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Happens more often than you think. Look at how the Nats bombed after 2019. Even the O’s, while they didn’t win the WS in 2014, went from 96 wins to 47 wins in 4 years. 

You're right, but the Orioles of my youth were always good.  The descent from 84-88 was shocking to me as I only knew the Orioles as contenders.  I've gotten used poor teams over the last forty years, unfortunately.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...