Jump to content

O's Need Bullpen Help in the Worst Way


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, EdwinRip said:

Rays are the best team in baseball with the best home record.  Did you think we were going to win 8-2?

No... but I'm hoping that the O's can construct a bullpen that doesn't give up 3 runs in 4 innings. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oriolefan1035 said:

Well it’s not an immediate help, but if the Orioles are trying to cap GrayRod’s innings, throwing out of the pen in the postseason didn’t seem to hurt David Price in 2008…

I love that idea. IF Grayson can throw strikes, show command, and get outs. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, orioles119 said:

Nice guys don't win championships.

What a ludicrous thing to say. No nice guy has ever won a championship?  Tell it to Brooks Robinson.  

I think Chapman is past his prime and I’d rather get someone younger and more consistent.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refusal to use Akin is just really weird to me. He has as good or better of a chance at succeeding in the middle innings than anyone used tonight. Baumann has thrown so much lately.

I think there's a 100% chance we pick up Nabil Crismatt on waivers. He's healthy now and has had a lot of bulk inning success in the past. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, orioles119 said:

Nice guys don't win championships.

Plenty of nice guys win championships. I think the more accurate way to put it is that you don’t need 26 Boy Scouts to win championships — having one Chapman along with the 25 good dudes we’d have on the roster wouldn’t sink the team. 

1 hour ago, oriolefan1035 said:

Well it’s not an immediate help, but if the Orioles are trying to cap GrayRod’s innings, throwing out of the pen in the postseason didn’t seem to hurt David Price in 2008…

My only concern with this idea is that Grayson has been pretty terrible in the first inning of his starts this year (7.20 ERA, 1.028 OPSA). Obviously, it’s a little bit different for your first inning to be your only inning — as opposed to trying to keep something in the tank to pitch 5-6 innings over the course of a full outing. If he can just let it fly for an inning (or two), the stuff clearly would be dominant in short stints. Can he command the stuff in that role? No idea, but there’s probably only one way to find out…and they might be well served to use September to investigate that, if he hasn’t forced his way back into the rotation by then.

 

On the thread topic, I think it’s been clear for a while that the soft underbelly of the bullpen is actually the biggest weakness on the roster. Disappointing, to say the least, that we can’t put together a group of guys from Perez, Voth, Akin, Givens, Tate, etc., that can reliably get outs. But that’s where we are. 

I think if they’re serious about having a legitimately WS caliber bullpen — which is probably necessary with a middling rotation — they need two guys that can slot in between the Bautista/Cano connection at the end of games and the mostly decent group of Coulombe, Baker, Baumann, and maybe Akin/Vespi. That becomes a group that can genuinely shorten games. 

I think one high level addition is probably the most realistic hope, though. Which means they’ll pretty desperately need (a) everyone to stay healthy and (b) at least one of Baker or Baumann to figure it out and be a legit complement to Coulombe in the 6th/7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

The refusal to use Akin is just really weird to me. He has as good or better of a chance at succeeding in the middle innings than anyone used tonight. Baumann has thrown so much lately.

Bet we see him on Wednesday.  I like him and wish they were using him more.  At a minimum, he works fast and throws a lot of strikes.  It doesn’t drive you crazy to watch him, even when he gets hit around a bit.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is it right here. The ideal scenario. 
    • Definitely don't want Soto back.  I'm on the fence w/ Dominguez. I guess he's a fine hedge in the event that Felix isn't effective from the jump.  I don't want Rogers on this roster. As said before, I want an open competition for the 5th spot between Suarez, Povich, McDermott, Rogers. If Suarez doesn't make the rotation, he goes into the bullpen. Povich/McDermott/Rogers all have options. If I had it my way, here's what the 13 pitcher breakdown would be: SP1: Free Agent Signing (Snell, Burnes, Fried, etc.) SP2: Eflin SP3: Grayson SP4: Kremer SP5: Free Agent Signing and/or competition w/ Suarez, McDermott, Rogers, Povich Closer: Felix High Leverage: Coulombe High Leverage: Free Agent Signing Middle Reliever: Free Agent Signing *or* Dominguez Middle Reliever: Cano Middle Reliever: Webb Middle Reliever: Akin Middle/Long Reliever: Suarez I'd like to see this club sign a SP1, SP5, a high leverage arm and a reliable middle reliever type..
    • Have you not noticed, Frobby is not among us and I don't blame him one bit. Has been absent since last Wednesday evening.  By the way, I long lost track of any point and particularly relevance this discussion has to Burnes and 400 million.  Seems we are revisiting a lot of he should have - they could of - why can't we now. Great tangent though! Again, for the record, I believe no one is going to give Burnes anything close to 400 million. So my answer to the OP is again - No One!!!!
    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...