Jump to content

Let's talk Roster Crunch


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

So if a team were, for some insane reason, want to offer Hicks a three year 45 million contract at the end of the season he doesn't have an ability to sever his contract with the Yankees and accept?

Not that it would ever happen but that seems odd that it wouldn't be an option.

That is correct. They could extend his existing contract past 2025 but that is the only way he'd get more money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is right.

If some team offers Hicks 3/45m at this offseason.   The Yankees  pay 9.5m for 2024 and 9.5m  in 2025 plus 1M buyout for 2026.  That is 20m.

The new team would pay 5.5m in 2024, 5.5m 2025  and 14m for 2026.  For a total of 25m.  That goes to Hicks  over and above the Yankee contract.

The Yankee contract is written in stone just like Chris Davis contract was.  Anything over the Yankee contract is additive to Hicks.

Of course, I don't think anyone would offer such a contract with Hicks' injury history and age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, terpoh said:

That doesnt stop another team from paying more than minimum just because the Orioles are cheap. Hicks is worth more than league minimum, and is a free agent. Other teams don't care that he has 9.5 million coming from the Yankees. If Kyle Gibson makes 10 million and Adam Frazier makes 8 then I dont see why a team wouldnt pay 10+ for hicks on a one year deal if he produces the rest of the way. There is no way hes just "available" at league minimum for Elias to scoop him up. 

You clearly don’t understand how this works.  Every dollar up to $9.5 mm that some team pays Hicks is a dollar less that the Yankees have to pay Hicks.  He doesn’t benefit at all unless some team pays him more than $9.5 mm, which will never happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

You clearly don’t understand how this works.  Every dollar up to $9.5 mm that some team pays Hicks is a dollar less that the Yankees have to pay Hicks.  He doesn’t benefit at all unless some team pays him more than $9.5 mm, which will never happen.  

I dont understand the contract details and how it works completely you are right. But I am not sure how you came to that conclusion from my post. 

I proposed exactly what you are saying.. that a team could pay MORE than the 9.5 million for Hicks. My comparison was Frazier getting 8 million and Gibson getting 10 million. I am not sure what makes Kyle Gibson worth 10 million and not Aaron Hicks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, terpoh said:

I dont understand the contract details and how it works completely you are right. But I am not sure how you came to that conclusion from my post. 

I proposed exactly what you are saying.. that a team could pay MORE than the 9.5 million for Hicks. My comparison was Frazier getting 8 million and Gibson getting 10 million. I am not sure what makes Kyle Gibson worth 10 million and not Aaron Hicks. 

I would say then that you have a higher opinion of Aaron Hicks than I do, and higher than probably most of the posters here.   He’s had a good month, and I’m happy about that.  But nave you noticed that he’s hit .095 over his last 7 games?   He’s more likely to be the Aaron Hicks of the last five years than the Hicks of the last month.   And nobody’s paying $9.6 mm+ for that.  Now, if he plays super well in the 2nd half of 2023, maybe the situation will be different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I would say then that you have a higher opinion of Aaron Hicks than I do, and higher than probably most of the posters here.   He’s had a good month, and I’m happy about that.  But nave you noticed that he’s hit .095 over his last 7 games?   He’s more likely to be the Aaron Hicks of the last five years than the Hicks of the last month.   And nobody’s paying $9.6 mm+ for that.  Now, if he plays super well in the 2nd half of 2023, maybe the situation will be different. 

I think we are agreeing. I dont think Hicks is a 10+ million guy. I was just saying that it was a possibility if a team did think that. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...