Jump to content

Anyone tried the Immaculate Grid game?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

9/9, 90.

And I was able to fill 8 of the 9 squares with Oriole players.... SO CLOSE to the perfect all Oriole grid!     I feel like I just missed a hole in one by an inch.

Spoiler

Mark Buehrle, Jim Thome, Luis Aparicio

Richard Bleier, RIck Dempsey, Mike Mussina

Bobby Bonilla, Rich Hill, Andy Van Slyke

And I could have gotten the perfect 9 for 9, as there were a few gettable guys for the White Sox/Marlins square:   Derrek Lee and Edwin Jackson.    But they didn't come to me.   Maybe I should have let it percolate in my mind for a few hours before giving up and going with Buehrle.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9/9 144

Spoiler

Dave Smith, Andre Dawson, Ryne Sandberg

Zack Grienke, Pedro Martinez, Davey Lopes

Joe Morgan, Pete Rose, Jimmy Rollins

Dodgers/Astros was the last box I had to fill and I couldn't think of anyone other than Greinke, who was the highest at 37%.  I was annoyed that I couldn't think of anyone else such as Don Sutton (who I've used a lot and couldn't remember if he played for the Astros or not) Jeff Kent, Kenny Lofton, JD Marinez and the immortal Jerry Reuss.  Gregg Olson was also an answer.

Jimmy Rollins was 31%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

9/9 144

  Reveal hidden contents

Dave Smith, Andre Dawson, Ryne Sandberg

Zack Grienke, Pedro Martinez, Davey Lopes

Joe Morgan, Pete Rose, Jimmy Rollins

Dodgers/Astros was the last box I had to fill and I couldn't think of anyone other than Greinke, who was the highest at 37%.  I was annoyed that I couldn't think of anyone else such as Don Sutton (who I've used a lot and couldn't remember if he played for the Astros or not) Jeff Kent, Kenny Lofton, JD Marinez and the immortal Jerry Reuss.  Gregg Olson was also an answer.

Jimmy Rollins was 31%.

 

9/9, 106.  I didn’t really get a super low score anywhere, but the only place I had the most popular answer was Astros/Cubs.   I was surprised that answer was so popular.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a “we thought he was gonna be an Oriole” for Hou/Chi 8%
 

A former O 3B for Was/Phi 1%

Former O OF (played with Brady and Devereaux I believe) for LAD/Hou 2%

HOF from Big Red Machine for Hou/Phi (Moose’s answer) 5%

Well traveled P for Was/Cubs - mostly known for being an A or Dback. 0.3%

WS hero for Nats/LAD 4%

Old timers HOFers for Cubs and Dodgers runs 2% and 1%
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Like Icarus, I flew too close to the sun today.  Obviously I know dozens of .300 hitters in the Hall of Fame, but in my quest for a low score I guessed Lefty O’Doul.  Nope, he’s a .349 lifetime hitter but not in the Hall.  D’Oh!

That’s ok. I confused categories and guessed Jimmie Foxxx for the A’s.  I knew he was in the HOF and played for the Philadelphia A’s.  Couldn’t figure out how I was wrong until I realized that wasn’t even a category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it is possible to complete today's puzzle with all Orioles, though I would be amazed if any one could pull it off.   Looking up after the fact, I found that there is only one .300 hitter in the HoF that played for the Orioles -- Vladimir Guerrero.   There is only one 300 average A's player that played for the Orioles -- George Kell.  And Will Clark satisifies the .300 Cardinal that played for the Orioles.  For a Brave Hall of Famer who played for the Orioles:  Hoyt Wilhelm.   For an Astro HoFer that played for the Orioles:  Robin Roberts.  And to satisfy the 4 player blocks, there are multiple guys.   One set would be Bud NOrris (SL/Atl), Jace Peterson (Atl/Oak), Colby Rasmus (Hou/SL), and Miguel Tejada (Hou/Oak).

If you used those all-Oriole solutions you would have 9/9, 19 rarity score.

Me?   I had 8/9, 217.   The only square I was actually able to fill with an Oriole was Miguel Tejada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

Like Icarus, I flew too close to the sun today. 

Second day in a row.  I’d filled out 8 of 9 squares, knew an answer for Yankees/Giants, but thought I’d remembered that I’d recently seen a Hall of Famer who’d played for both like 90 years ago, that I figured would get a good score.  Zap!   Wrong, so my grid was 8/9, 123.   Had a good score going until blowing that, though I suspect my “safe” answer to that question would have been pretty popular.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I wouldn’t call that a “real strength”. Trade Perez and get a better arm to replace him.
    • But that RH bat played a position that we had locked down because of the presence of Urias and Westburg. He wasn’t going to come up and play. If you wanted him to be the RH DH, that’s fine but the Os also lost Mounty and Mayo didn’t come up and play well. They decided that having those 4 players was enough depth to use Norby to get pitching. I don’t see that as being wrong at all…no one to predict what would happen after. They had that “position” locked down. Jimenez was just a lottery ticket and really he played a lot more than they probably thought because of all the injuries that occurred.  
    • The 2025 bullpen looks like a real strength. R - Bautista, Cano, Dominguez, Webb L - Coloumbe, Soto, Perez, Akin I like having the 4 lefties with the WALL and that should be enough for the regular season.  It allows us to really matchup and take advantage of our ballpark. That’s a pen with 4 former All Stars. I believe Akin will still have an option since he made it through the season without burning his last one.  He’d be the guy to go down to AAA for a longman/fresh arm when needed. Maybe we get our lightning in a bottle reliever throwing near 100 in McDermott or Morfe later in the year. I don’t think we see much turnover here.  However, I could see Elias electing not to bring back Soto for flexibility reasons, more so than salary reasons.  Could we actually “sell” Soto for something of value?
    • https://www.masnsports.com/blog/reviewing-orioles-recent-coaching-history-and-thoughts-on-what-s-next From Roch.    An immediate reaction to the current openings is that Triple-A Norfolk manager Buck Britton could be a candidate to fill one of them. They also could seek a bilingual coach now that González and Hernández are gone. Britton’s contract expires at the end of the month and he’s close with the young hitters who passed through Norfolk. He’s also gained the respect of other teams in the majors and could move on, which would leave the Orioles with another task.   
    • If we don’t resign Burnes then what are we doing as a franchise?  It’s hard to see any difference between Rubenstei and what we had before. A case can be made for not bringing back Santander.  Heck, even Soto, but with our SP injuries, and the way we’ve spent our draft capital, the plan looked to be to always land that big time SP from outside the org.  Well that happened.  Gotta keep him now.
    • He called it a solid trade at the time it was made and he’ll die before he admits he was wrong about something. 
    • There was a need for a RH bat. We used a major league ready RH bat (who was also serviceable in the field) in the trade for Rogers. We added a bad RH bat, who was not able to play defense at all.  Neither Eloy or Rogers were able to keep their spot on the roster, and we had two guys go down that would have opened spots for Norby. So yes, it does have something to do with the Rogers trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...