Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, interloper said:

I would love to see thay happen. That would be a good fit for all involved including Mateo. He would have Miami culture and be closer to his home Dominican Republic there. 

The Orioles would be able to trade from Surpluss + move salary + open up a path for thr youngsters, all for pitching. And the Marlins would get a solid defensive shortstop + lighting fast base stealing/run manufacturing machine to fill their need. Who knows, Mateo could also go off on a huge All Star level heater like he did in the first month of the 2023 season. Never know what a change of scenery can do for a guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jordan Montgomery.

How were we “in” on Nola, but aren’t tied to Montgomery at all?  I know the reports came out after the fact that we had interest in Nola, but if he was ever a possibility then Montgomery definitely should be.

Talk about a perfect fit. Playoff tested LH vet. For our ballpark. Even has a playoff start in OPACY. He was the perfect fit at the deadline and still his.

They could work the contract to where he gets 5/125ish overall, but gets less in 2024, and more in 2025 when we have Santa, Means, Kimbrel, McCann, and O’Hearn all coming off the books. As well as possibly Urias, Mateo, Hays, Mullins, and Irvin.

I know there’s raises in arb, and new players hitting arb, but we’re about to have a team mostly in pre-arb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Jordan Montgomery.

How were we “in” on Nola, but aren’t tied to Montgomery at all?  I know the reports came out after the fact that we had interest in Nola, but if he was ever a possibility then Montgomery definitely should be.

Talk about a perfect fit. Playoff tested LH vet. For our ballpark. Even has a playoff start in OPACY. He was the perfect fit at the deadline and still his.

They could work the contract to where he gets 5/125ish overall, but gets less in 2024, and more in 2025 when we have Santa, Means, Kimbrel, McCann, and O’Hearn all coming off the books. As well as possibly Urias, Mateo, Hays, Mullins, and Irvin.

I know there’s raises in arb, and new players hitting arb, but we’re about to have a team mostly in pre-arb. 

We "checked in" on Nola. I wouldn't read anything into that or the absence of the same report with regards to Montgomery. He's not in play for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Jordan Montgomery.

How were we “in” on Nola, but aren’t tied to Montgomery at all?  I know the reports came out after the fact that we had interest in Nola, but if he was ever a possibility then Montgomery definitely should be.

Talk about a perfect fit. Playoff tested LH vet. For our ballpark. Even has a playoff start in OPACY. He was the perfect fit at the deadline and still his.

They could work the contract to where he gets 5/125ish overall, but gets less in 2024, and more in 2025 when we have Santa, Means, Kimbrel, McCann, and O’Hearn all coming off the books. As well as possibly Urias, Mateo, Hays, Mullins, and Irvin.

I know there’s raises in arb, and new players hitting arb, but we’re about to have a team mostly in pre-arb. 

I mean, I would love that.

But it ain't happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

I mean, I would love that.

But it ain't happening. 

It sucks, and I don’t know how to do a self imposed “poor team” budget, but we could do a deal with him to keep the first year down until Rubenstein gets in here and the previous players mentioned are off the books. There’s deferrals also. 

If the general framework is somewhere around 5/125 for easy math’s sake… then he could only make $10 million the first year with the other $15 million spread out over the other four years, or even some in deferrals. We basically gave Kimbrel the Gibson money from last year. We could give Montgomery the Frazier/Givens money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It sucks, and I don’t know how to do a self imposed “poor team” budget, but we could do a deal with him to keep the first year down until Rubenstein gets in here and the previous players mentioned are off the books. There’s deferrals also. 

If the general framework is somewhere around 5/125 for easy math’s sake… then he could only make $10 million the first year with the other $15 million spread out over the other four years, or even some in deferrals. We basically gave Kimbrel the Gibson money from last year. We could give Montgomery the Frazier/Givens money. 

I think the problem is I'm not sure if he even gives the O's the chance to make that kind of proposal. Because some big market team will just instantly be able to beat all of that. From the AAV to the years to the total guaranteed, you know? 

But again, I'm with you. He's a great fit here in basically every way. 3 straight years of 30 or more starts. Exactly what we need at the top of the rotation. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were never IN on Nola.  Maybe we called to see if he likes crab cakes but that’s about it.

Montgomery will get a regrettable contract.

Send Mateo for whatever the Marlins will trade you. I’m ok if he starts the year here if you want Holliday down at first but if I can get something for him, he gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Send Mateo for whatever the Marlins will trade you. I’m ok if he starts the year here if you want Holliday down at first but if I can get something for him, he gone.

Elias should pull a Billy Beane and trade Mateo now just so Hyde isn't tempted to give him regular ABs (ala Carlos Pena). Even if Holliday doesn't make the team Urias seems like a perfectly fine short term contingency plan. Or heck, just bank on one of Holliday or Ortiz making the OD roster. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Elias should pull a Billy Beane and trade Mateo now just so Hyde isn't tempted to give him regular ABs (ala Carlos Pena). Even if Holliday doesn't make the team Urias seems like a perfectly fine short term contingency plan. Or heck, just bank on one of Holliday or Ortiz making the OD roster. 

Elias obviously wants Mateo playing. Otherwise, he’d just call up Ortiz and ship Mateo out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I would love to see thay happen. That would be a good fit for all involved including Mateo. He would have Miami culture and be closer to his home Dominican Republic there. 

The Orioles would be able to trade from Surpluss + move salary + open up a path for thr youngsters, all for pitching. And the Marlins would get a solid defensive shortstop + lighting fast base stealing/run manufacturing machine to fill their need. Who knows, Mateo could also go off on a huge All Star level heater like he did in the first month of the 2023 season. Never know what a change of scenery can do for a guy.

 

And how exactly would the bolded part help the Marlins? Also, it's a bit hard to steal bases when you don't get on base or hit. Also, the Marlins already have their own version of Mateo in Jon Berti. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I would love to see thay happen. That would be a good fit for all involved including Mateo. He would have Miami culture and be closer to his home Dominican Republic there. 

The Orioles would be able to trade from Surpluss + move salary + open up a path for thr youngsters, all for pitching. And the Marlins would get a solid defensive shortstop + lighting fast base stealing/run manufacturing machine to fill their need. Who knows, Mateo could also go off on a huge All Star level heater like he did in the first month of the 2023 season. Never know what a change of scenery can do for a guy.

 

Change of swing might do him better ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We fans seem to be great at articulating why our guys would be perfect fits for other teams.   When we have to make a case why our guy would be so much better off "not here", there's likely a reason that guy is still here.  

I like to think about it this way....would any of us want to actually trade someone decent from our system to acquire Mateo if he wasn't here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...