Jump to content

Poster Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

Just now, RZNJ said:

I would try to argue your points but you didn't make any.

Not giving up 2 top 100 players plus more for Cease. The peripherals are good but beyond the one season his numbers are comparable to worse than Kremer. I don’t care about Ks or potential for a guy that’s been around 5 seasons. We aren’t signing him to an extension so it’s highly likely 80+ IMO that you look back later and regret it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Not giving up 2 top 100 players plus more for Cease. The peripherals are good but beyond the one season his numbers are comparable to worse than Kremer. I don’t care about Ks or potential for a guy that’s been around 5 seasons. We aren’t signing him to an extension so it’s highly likely 80+ IMO that you look back later and regret it.

Fangraphs strongly disagrees that Cease and Kremer are comparable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Fangraphs strongly disagrees that Cease and Kremer are comparable. 

If you knock out April Kremer has been a mid 3 ERA pitcher over 2 full seasons. I could give a crap about fangraphs. Cease is only under control for 2 seasons. He’s had one stellar year and a 4+ ERA over the rest. If you like  him great ….I don’t 

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

If you knock out April Kremer has been a mid 3 ERA pitcher over 2 full seasons. I could give a crap about fangraphs. Cease is only under control for 2 seasons. He’s had one stellar year and a 4+ ERA over the rest. If you like  him great ….I don’t 

Does this work both ways?  Take away Cease’s August and he has a 3.89 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Fangraphs strongly disagrees that Cease and Kremer are comparable. 

If the White Sox offered us Cease for Kremer even up, I’d need to think long and hard about it.  Cease is the better pitcher, but Kremer is pretty solid and 4 years is twice as good as two years.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kremer, Santander, Mayo for Logan Gilbert

 

It gives the M’s the DH/COF they’re looking for, a formidable back end starter to replace Gilbert, and a very good prospect that is close to being major league ready. The difference in Santander and Gilbert’s arbitration pay (using MLBTR estimates) is $7.8m…so its adding a little to the M’s payroll but they just cleared some space and it’s still good value for Santander.

It upgrades Kremers spot in the rotation for the O’s and frees up some money to throw at Jordan Montgomery in FA. Mayo doesn’t have a spot in Baltimore and he’s pretty much ready. He is a great candidate to cash in on his prospect value IMO. 

It’s possible something else may need to be added for the M’s to make the deal, but probably nothing anywhere near our top 10.

Rotation 

Montgomery, Gilbert, Bradish, Rodriguez, Means

Lineup looks something like

CF Mullins L

C Rutschman S

SS Henderson L

1B Mountcastle R

DH Kjerstad L

LF Hays R

RF Cowser L

3B Westburg R

2B Holliday L

 

I fully concede that none of that is happening, just having fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If the White Sox offered us Cease for Kremer even up, I’d need to think long and hard about it.  Cease is the better pitcher, but Kremer is pretty solid and 4 years is twice as good as two years.   

I would do Kremer for Cease (or Luzardo, or Framber) in a heartbeat. And I’m a Kremer fan and think he’s often underrated. 

But we should be looking for upside plays to increase chances of a World Series and Cease beats Kremer in that regard.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spy Fox said:

I would do Kremer for Cease (or Luzardo, or Framber) in a heartbeat. And I’m a Kremer fan and think he’s often underrated. 

But we should be looking for upside plays to increase chances of a World Series and Cease beats Kremer in that regard.

I’d probably do it too, but I’d rather give up position players or prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If the White Sox offered us Cease for Kremer even up, I’d need to think long and hard about it.  Cease is the better pitcher, but Kremer is pretty solid and 4 years is twice as good as two years.   

I think that’s a trade a team HAS TO make.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oriole said:

Kremer, Santander, Mayo for Logan Gilbert

 

It gives the M’s the DH/COF they’re looking for, a formidable back end starter to replace Gilbert, and a very good prospect that is close to being major league ready. The difference in Santander and Gilbert’s arbitration pay (using MLBTR estimates) is $7.8m…so its adding a little to the M’s payroll but they just cleared some space and it’s still good value for Santander.

It upgrades Kremers spot in the rotation for the O’s and frees up some money to throw at Jordan Montgomery in FA. Mayo doesn’t have a spot in Baltimore and he’s pretty much ready. He is a great candidate to cash in on his prospect value IMO. 

It’s possible something else may need to be added for the M’s to make the deal, but probably nothing anywhere near our top 10.

Rotation 

Montgomery, Gilbert, Bradish, Rodriguez, Means

Lineup looks something like

CF Mullins L

C Rutschman S

SS Henderson L

1B Mountcastle R

DH Kjerstad L

LF Hays R

RF Cowser L

3B Westburg R

2B Holliday L

 

I fully concede that none of that is happening, just having fun.

Ha.  Throwing huge FA signings into your trade scenario?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

If you knock out April Kremer has been a mid 3 ERA pitcher over 2 full seasons. I could give a crap about fangraphs. Cease is only under control for 2 seasons. He’s had one stellar year and a 4+ ERA over the rest. If you like  him great ….I don’t 

I'm not even the biggest Cease supporter, but comparing Kremer to him is just...

giphy-downsized-large.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...